Literature DB >> 18521836

Electrolytic ablation is as effective as radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of artificial liver metastases in a pig model.

Sebastian Hinz1, Jan-Hendrik Egberts, Ursula Pauser, Clemens Schafmayer, Fred Fändrich, Jürgen Tepel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The best treatment option for liver metastases is complete surgical resection. Unfortunately, at the time of diagnosis, not all patients are candidates for complete resection. Electrolytic therapy (ECT) is a novel non-thermal method of tissue destruction. We evaluated its safety and effectiveness in comparison with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
METHODS: Tumor mimics were created by injecting a gel into the pig liver. The volume of the lesions was measured by ultrasound before treatment. The tumor mimics were treated with either RFA or electrolytic ablation. 48 h after treatment the liver was fixed in formalin and subjected to histological examination.
RESULTS: Histological investigation confirmed that all lesions were completely surrounded by necrosis after treatment with either ECT or RFA. Two different types of necrosis were identified. After RFA the cell membranes disappeared but the nuclei were still intact, whereas after ECT these structures were completely disrupted. After ECT the necrosis was often surrounded by infiltrating lymphocytes. This inflammatory reaction was not apparent after RFA.
CONCLUSION: ECT produced predictable and reproducible necrosis in pig livers and was as effective as RFA at destroying a defined target lesion. A local inflammatory reaction after ECT may favour the development of a systemic immune response. Our results indicate that ECT is an alternative treatment option for irresectable liver metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18521836     DOI: 10.1002/jso.21088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  3 in total

1.  Patterns of histological changes following hepatic electrolytic ablation in an ex-vivo perfused model.

Authors:  Gianpiero Gravante; Seok Ling Ong; Kevin West; Angus McGregor; Guy J Maddern; Matthew S Metcalfe; David M Lloyd; Ashley R Dennison
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Antitumor effects of electrochemical treatment.

Authors:  Héctor Manuel Camué Ciria; Maraelys Morales González; Lisset Ortíz Zamora; Luis Enrique Bergues Cabrales; Gustavo Victoriano Sierra González; Luciana Oliveira de Oliveira; Rodrigo Zanella; Antonio Carlos Buzaid; Orlando Parise; Luciana Macedo Brito; Cesar Augusto Antunes Teixeira; Marina das Neves Gomes; Gleyce Moreno; Venicio Feo da Veiga; Marcos Telló; Carla Holandino
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Electrochemical treatment: An investigation of dose-response relationships using an isolated liver perfusion model.

Authors:  Ralf Czymek; Dorothea Dinter; Stephan Löffler; Maximilian Gebhard; Tilman Laubert; Andreas Lubienski; Hans-Peter Bruch; Andreas Schmidt
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.485

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.