Literature DB >> 2359275

Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP).

R M Cox1, C Gilmore.   

Abstract

This paper reports the development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP), a 66-item self-administered inventory that quantifies performance with a hearing aid in everyday life using both seven-score and four-score profiles. The profiles assess experience with amplification in terms of speech communication in three types of listening situations and in terms of reactions to amplified environmental sounds. The PHAP has been evaluated using groups consisting mainly of elderly hearing aid wearers having mild to moderate hearing impairments. Internal consistency reliability of the scales and subscales ranges from .70 to .91. Test-retest correlations range from .66 to .88. Ninety percent and 95% critical differences are presented to facilitate evaluation of differences between scores for the same individual under different conditions. It is envisioned that the PHAP will have its principal application in research evaluating and comparing different approaches to hearing aid fittings. In addition, the inventory can be used clinically to assess existing hearing aid fittings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2359275     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3302.343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  17 in total

1.  Modeling and predicting hearing aid outcome.

Authors:  Larry E Humes
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

2.  Examination of the validity of auditory traits and tests.

Authors:  G A Flamme
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-09

3.  Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.

Authors:  C V Palmer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-03

4.  Self-report outcome measures for adult hearing aid services: some uses, users, and options.

Authors:  S Gatehouse
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-09

5.  The vibrant® soundbridge™.

Authors:  Deborah Arthur
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-06

6.  The Audioscan RM500 Speechmap/DSL Fitting System.

Authors:  W A Cole; S T Sinclair
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-12

7.  Self-monitoring of listening abilities in normal-hearing children, normal-hearing adults, and children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann M Rothpletz; Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 8.  Disruptive Hearing Technologies and Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss II: Current Research on Affordable Hearing Technologies and Direct-to-Consumer Models.

Authors:  Anna Marie Jilla; Carole E Johnson; Jeffrey L Danhauer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-06-15

9.  Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  K I Kirk; D B Pisoni; R C Miyamoto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Using patient perceptions of relative benefit and enjoyment to assess auditory training.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell S Sommers; Elizabeth Mauzé; Catherine Schroy; Joe Barcroft; Brent Spehar
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.