Literature DB >> 23592733

Magnetic compression in gastrointestinal and bilioenteric anastomosis: how much force?

Tadhg Lambe1, Mícheál G Ó Ríordáin, Ronan A Cahill, Pádraig Cantillon-Murphy.   

Abstract

AIM: The concept of compression alimentary anastomosis is well established. Recently, magnetic axial alignment pressures have been encompassed within such device constructs. We quantify the magnetic compression force and pressure required to successfully achieve gastrointestinal and bilioenteric anastomosis by in-depth interrogation of the reported literature.
METHODS: Reports of successful deployment and proof of anastomotic patency on survival were scrutinized to quantify the necessary dimensions and strengths of magnetic devices in (a) gastroenteral anastomosis in live porcine models and (b) bilioenteric anastomosis in the clinical setting. Using a calculatory tool developed for this work (magnetic force determination algorithm, MAGDA), ideal magnetic force and compression pressure were quantified from successful reports with regard to their variance by intermagnet separation.
RESULTS: Optimized ranges for both compression force and pressure were determined for successful porcine gastroenteral and clinical bilioenteric anastomoses. For gastroenteral anastomoses (porcine investigations), an optimized compression force between 2.55 and 3.57 kg at 2-mm intermagnet separation is recommended. The associated compression pressure should not exceed 60 N/cm(2). Successful bilioenteric anastomoses is best clinically achieved with intermagnet compression of 18 to 31 g and associated pressures between 1 and 3.5 N/mm(2) (at 2-mm intermagnet separation).
CONCLUSION: The creation of magnetic compression anastomoses using permanent magnets demonstrates a remarkable resilience to variations in magnetic force and pressure exertion. However, inappropriate selection of compression characteristics and magnet dimensions may incur difficulties. Recommendations of this work and the availability of the free online tool (http://magda.ucc.ie/) may facilitate a factor of robustness in the design and refinement of future devices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bilioenteric anastomosis; gastrointestinal anastomosis; magnetic compression anastomosis; minimally invasive surgery; surgical device; surgical innovation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23592733     DOI: 10.1177/1553350613484824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


  7 in total

1.  Hybrid fluorescent magnetic gastrojejunostomy: an experimental feasibility study in the porcine model and human cadaver.

Authors:  Ryohei Watanabe; Manuel Barberio; Shingo Kanaji; Alfonso Lapergola; Anila Hoskere Ashoka; Bohdan Andreiuk; Ludovica Guerriero; Margherita Pizzicannella; Barbara Seeliger; Yoshihisa Saida; Hironori Kaneko; Marc Worreth; Alend Saadi; Jacques Marescaux; Andrey S Klymchenko; Michele Diana
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Choledochojejunostomy with an innovative magnetic compressive anastomosis: How to determine optimal pressure?

Authors:  Fei Xue; Hong-Chang Guo; Jian-Peng Li; Jian-Wen Lu; Hao-Hua Wang; Feng Ma; Ya-Xiong Liu; Yi Lv
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Treatment of rectovaginal fistula by magnetic compression.

Authors:  Zhan-Fei She; Xiao-Peng Yan; Feng Ma; Hao-Hua Wang; Huan Yang; Ai-Hua Shi; Liang Wang; Xin Qi; Bin Xiao; Yu-Liang Zou; Yi Lv
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Magnetic compression anastomosis for the treatment of benign biliary strictures: a clinical study from China.

Authors:  Yu Li; Hao Sun; Xiaopeng Yan; Shanpei Wang; Dinghui Dong; Xuemin Liu; Bo Wang; Maosheng Su; Yi Lv
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Electromagnetic tool for the endoscopic creation of colon anastomoses-development and feasibility assessment of a novel anastomosis compression implant approach.

Authors:  Jana Steger; Anne Zimmermann; Thomas Wittenberg; Petra Mela; Dirk Wilhelm
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 6.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques.

Authors:  Jana Steger; Alissa Jell; Stefanie Ficht; Daniel Ostler; Markus Eblenkamp; Petra Mela; Dirk Wilhelm
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.755

7.  Fedora-type magnetic compression anastomosis device for intestinal anastomosis.

Authors:  Huan Chen; Tao Ma; Yue Wang; Hao-Yang Zhu; Zhe Feng; Rong-Qian Wu; Yi Lv; Ding-Hui Dong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.