AIMS: Digoxin is recommended for long-term rate control in paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). While some analyses suggest an association of digoxin with a higher mortality in AF, the intrinsic nature of this association has not been examined in propensity-matched cohorts, which is the objective of the current study. METHODS AND RESULTS: In Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM), 4060 patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF were randomized to rate (n = 2027) vs. rhythm (n = 2033) control strategies. Of these, 1377 received digoxin as initial therapy and 1329 received no digoxin at baseline. Propensity scores for digoxin use were estimated for each of these 2706 patients and used to assemble a cohort of 878 pairs of patients receiving and not receiving digoxin, who were balanced on 59 baseline characteristics. Matched patients had a mean age of 70 years, 40% were women, and 11% non-white. During the 3.4 years of the mean follow-up, all-cause mortality occurred in 14 and 13% of matched patients receiving and not receiving digoxin, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) associated with digoxin use: 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-1.37; P = 0.640]. Among matched patients, digoxin had no association with all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.85-1.09; P = 0.510) or incident non-fatal cardiac arrhythmias (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.37-2.23; P = 0.827). Digoxin had no multivariable-adjusted or propensity score-adjusted associations with these outcomes in the pre-match cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF, we found no evidence of increased mortality or hospitalization in those taking digoxin as baseline initial therapy.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Digoxin is recommended for long-term rate control in paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). While some analyses suggest an association of digoxin with a higher mortality in AF, the intrinsic nature of this association has not been examined in propensity-matched cohorts, which is the objective of the current study. METHODS AND RESULTS: In Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM), 4060 patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF were randomized to rate (n = 2027) vs. rhythm (n = 2033) control strategies. Of these, 1377 received digoxin as initial therapy and 1329 received no digoxin at baseline. Propensity scores for digoxin use were estimated for each of these 2706 patients and used to assemble a cohort of 878 pairs of patients receiving and not receiving digoxin, who were balanced on 59 baseline characteristics. Matched patients had a mean age of 70 years, 40% were women, and 11% non-white. During the 3.4 years of the mean follow-up, all-cause mortality occurred in 14 and 13% of matched patients receiving and not receiving digoxin, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) associated with digoxin use: 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-1.37; P = 0.640]. Among matched patients, digoxin had no association with all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.85-1.09; P = 0.510) or incident non-fatal cardiac arrhythmias (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.37-2.23; P = 0.827). Digoxin had no multivariable-adjusted or propensity score-adjusted associations with these outcomes in the pre-match cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF, we found no evidence of increased mortality or hospitalization in those taking digoxin as baseline initial therapy.
Authors: Yoko Miyasaka; Marion E Barnes; Bernard J Gersh; Stephen S Cha; Kent R Bailey; Walter Abhayaratna; James B Seward; Toshiji Iwasaka; Teresa S M Tsang Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2006-01-06 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Ali Ahmed; Michael W Rich; Thomas E Love; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Inmaculada B Aban; Wilson S Colucci; Kirkwood F Adams; Mihai Gheorghiade Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2005-12-08 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Ali Ahmed; Ahsan Husain; Thomas E Love; Giovanni Gambassi; Louis J Dell'Italia; Gary S Francis; Mihai Gheorghiade; Richard M Allman; Sreelatha Meleth; Robert C Bourge Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2006-05-18 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Ali Ahmed; Michael W Rich; Jerome L Fleg; Michael R Zile; James B Young; Dalane W Kitzman; Thomas E Love; Wilbert S Aronow; Kirkwood F Adams; Mihai Gheorghiade Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-07-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: D J van Veldhuisen; A J Man in 't Veld; P H Dunselman; D J Lok; H J Dohmen; J C Poortermans; A J Withagen; W H Pasteuning; J Brouwer; K I Lie Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1993-11-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mintu P Turakhia; Pasquale Santangeli; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Xiangyan Xu; Aditya J Ullal; Claire T Than; Susan Schmitt; Tyson H Holmes; Susan M Frayne; Ciaran S Phibbs; Felix Yang; Donald D Hoang; P Michael Ho; Paul A Heidenreich Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gyorgy Frendl; Alissa C Sodickson; Mina K Chung; Albert L Waldo; Bernard J Gersh; James E Tisdale; Hugh Calkins; Sary Aranki; Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Stephen Cassivi; Sidney C Smith; Dawood Darbar; Jon O Wee; Thomas K Waddell; David Amar; Dale Adler Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Andrew P Ambrosy; Ankeet S Bhatt; Amanda L Stebbins; Lisa M Wruck; Marat Fudim; Stephen J Greene; William E Kraus; Christopher M O'Connor; Ileana L Piña; David J Whellan; Robert J Mentz Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2018-02-11 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Liang-Han Ling; Peter M Kistler; Jonathan M Kalman; Richard J Schilling; Ross J Hunter Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 32.419