Literature DB >> 23592373

Hotspot mutations in PIK3CA associate with first-line treatment outcome for aromatase inhibitors but not for tamoxifen.

Diana E Ramirez-Ardila1, Jean C Helmijr, Maxime P Look, Irene Lurkin, Kirsten Ruigrok-Ritstier, Steven van Laere, Luc Dirix, Fred C Sweep, Paul N Span, Sabine C Linn, John A Foekens, Stefan Sleijfer, Els M J J Berns, Maurice P H M Jansen.   

Abstract

PIK3CA mutations occur frequently in breast cancer, predominantly in exons 9 and 20. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the PIK3CA mutation status for its relationship with prognosis and first-line endocrine therapy outcome. PIK3CA exon 9 and 20 were evaluated for mutations in 1,352 primary breast cancer specimens by SnaPshot multiplex analyses. The mutation status was studied for their relationship with metastasis-free survival (MFS) in 342 untreated lymph node-negative (LNN) patients and to time to progression (TTP) in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients with metastatic disease treated with first-line tamoxifen (N = 447) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs; N = 84). We detected in 423 patients hotspot mutations for PIK3CA (31 %). Mutations in exon 20 were detected in 251 patients (59 %), with H1047L and H1047R mutations in 37 (15 %) and 214 (85 %) cases, respectively. Mutations in PIK3CA exon 9 were discovered in 173 patients (41 %), with E542K and E545K mutations in 57 (32 %) and 104 (60 %) cases as most prevalent ones. Evaluation of the untreated LNN patients for prognosis showed no relationship between MFS and PIK3CA mutations, neither for exon 9 [HR = 1.04 (95 % CI 0.57-1.89), P = 0.90] nor for exon 20 [HR = 0.98 (95 % CI 0.63-1.54); P = 0.94] when compared to wild-type. The PIK3CA mutation status was also not associated with treatment outcome after first-line tamoxifen. On the other hand, patients treated with first-line AIs showed a longer TTP when having a PIK3CA mutation in exon 9 [HR = 0.40 (95 % CI 0.17-0.95); P = 0.038] or exon 20 [HR = 0.50 (95 % CI 0.27-0.91); P = 0.024] compared to wild-types, both significant in uni- and multivariate analysis including traditional predictive factors. All results remained when only HER2-negative patients were evaluated for each cohort. PIK3CA mutations in ER-positive tumors were significantly associated with a favorable outcome after first-line AIs, which needs further confirmation in other datasets. Mutations were not associated with prognosis in untreated LNN patients nor predictive outcome after first-line tamoxifen therapy in advanced disease patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23592373     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2529-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  24 in total

Review 1.  Mutation distributions and clinical correlations of PIK3CA gene mutations in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ebubekir Dirican; Mustafa Akkiprik; Ayşe Özer
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-02-26

2.  LRG1 mRNA expression in breast cancer associates with PIK3CA genotype and with aromatase inhibitor therapy outcome.

Authors:  Diana E Ramirez-Ardila; Kirsten Ruigrok-Ritstier; Jean C Helmijr; Maxime P Look; Steven van Laere; Luc Dirix; Els M J J Berns; Maurice P H M Jansen
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  MSEA: detection and quantification of mutation hotspots through mutation set enrichment analysis.

Authors:  Peilin Jia; Quan Wang; Qingxia Chen; Katherine E Hutchinson; William Pao; Zhongming Zhao
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.583

4.  Genomic alterations in advanced gastric cancer endoscopic biopsy samples using targeted next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Sai Ge; Beifang Li; Yanyan Li; Zhongwu Li; Zhentao Liu; Zuhua Chen; Jian Wu; Jing Gao; Lin Shen
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  SIAH2 protein expression in breast cancer is inversely related with ER status and outcome to tamoxifen therapy.

Authors:  Kimberly D van der Willik; Mieke M Timmermans; Carolien Hm van Deurzen; Maxime P Look; Esther A Reijm; Wendy Jhp van Zundert; Renée Foekens; Anita Mac Trapman-Jansen; Michael A den Bakker; Pieter J Westenend; John Wm Martens; Els Mjj Berns; Maurice Phm Jansen
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 6.  New insights on PI3K/AKT pathway alterations and clinical outcomes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sherry X Yang; Eric Polley; Stanley Lipkowitz
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 12.111

7.  Characterization of breast cancers with PI3K mutations in an academic practice setting using SNaPshot profiling.

Authors:  Vandana G Abramson; M Cooper Lloyd; Tarah Ballinger; Melinda E Sanders; Liping Du; Darson Lai; Zengliu Su; Ingrid Mayer; Mia Levy; Delecia R LaFrance; Cindy L Vnencak-Jones; Yu Shyr; Kimberly B Dahlman; William Pao; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  A classification system for clinical relevance of somatic variants identified in molecular profiling of cancer.

Authors:  Mahadeo A Sukhai; Kenneth J Craddock; Mariam Thomas; Aaron R Hansen; Tong Zhang; Lillian Siu; Philippe Bedard; Tracy L Stockley; Suzanne Kamel-Reid
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  PI3K mutations in breast cancer: prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Toru Mukohara
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2015-05-15

10.  Significance of PIK3CA Mutations in Patients with Early Breast Cancer Treated with Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Study.

Authors:  George Papaxoinis; Vassiliki Kotoula; Zoi Alexopoulou; Konstantine T Kalogeras; Flora Zagouri; Eleni Timotheadou; Helen Gogas; George Pentheroudakis; Christos Christodoulou; Angelos Koutras; Dimitrios Bafaloukos; Gerasimos Aravantinos; Pavlos Papakostas; Elpida Charalambous; Kyriaki Papadopoulou; Ioannis Varthalitis; Ioannis Efstratiou; Thomas Zaramboukas; Helen Patsea; Chrisoula D Scopa; Maria Skondra; Paris Kosmidis; Dimitrios Pectasides; George Fountzilas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.