Literature DB >> 28744403

Genomic alterations in advanced gastric cancer endoscopic biopsy samples using targeted next-generation sequencing.

Sai Ge1, Beifang Li1, Yanyan Li1, Zhongwu Li2, Zhentao Liu1, Zuhua Chen1, Jian Wu3, Jing Gao1, Lin Shen1.   

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) remains the second tumor caused death threat worldwide, and personalized medicine for GC is far from expectation. Finding novel, recurrently mutated genes through next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a powerful and productive approach. However, previous genomic data for GC are based on surgical resected samples while a large proportion of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients have already missed the chance for operation. The aim of this study is to assess frequent genomic alteration in AGC via biopsy samples. Here we performed targeted genomic sequencing of 78 AGC patients' tumor biopsies along with matched lymphocyte samples based on a 118 cancer related gene panel. In total, we observed 301 somatic nonsynonymous genomic alterations in 92 different genes, as well as 37 copy number gain events among 15 different genes (fold change 2-12), and validated the fold changes of ERBB2 copy number gains with IHC and FISH test showed an accuracy of 81.8%. Previously reported driver genes for gastric cancer (TP53, KMT2D, KMT2B, EGFR, PIK3CA, GNAQ, and ARID1A), and several unreported mutations (TGFBR2, RNF213, NF1, NSD1, and LRP2) showed high non-silent mutation prevalence (7.7%-34.6%). When comparing intestinal-type gastric cancer (IGC) with diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC), TP53 and GNAQ appear to be more frequently mutated in IGC (P=0.028 and P=0.023, respectively), whereas LRP2, BRCA2 and FGFR3 mutations are not observed in IGC, but have 12.8%, 7.7% and 7.7% mutation rates, respectively, in DGC patients. Patients with one or more mutations in adherens junction pathway (CREBBP, EP300, CDH1, CTNNB1, EGFR, MET, TGFBR2 and ERBB2) or TGF-β signaling pathway (CREBBP, EP300, MYST4, KRAS and TGFBR2) showed significantly better overall survival (P=0.007 and P=0.014, respectively), consistent with The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort data. Importantly, 57 (73.1%) patients harbored at least one genomic alteration with potential treatments, making NGS-based drug target screening a viable option for AGC patients. Our study established a comprehensive genomic portrait of AGC, and identified several mutation signatures highly associated with clinical features, survival outcomes, which may be used to design future personalized treatments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; next-generation sequencing; prognosis; targetable alterations

Year:  2017        PMID: 28744403      PMCID: PMC5523034     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cancer Res        ISSN: 2156-6976            Impact factor:   6.166


  35 in total

1.  BRAF mutation may have different prognostic implications in early- and late-stage colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kuo-Hsing Chen; Yu-Lin Lin; Jau-Yu Liau; Jia-Huei Tsai; Li-Hui Tseng; Liang-In Lin; Jin-Tung Liang; Been-Ren Lin; Ji-Shiang Hung; Yih-Leong Chang; Kun-Huei Yeh; Ann-Lii Cheng
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Recurrent GNAS mutations define an unexpected pathway for pancreatic cyst development.

Authors:  Jian Wu; Hanno Matthaei; Anirban Maitra; Marco Dal Molin; Laura D Wood; James R Eshleman; Michael Goggins; Marcia I Canto; Richard D Schulick; Barish H Edil; Christopher L Wolfgang; Alison P Klein; Luis A Diaz; Peter J Allen; C Max Schmidt; Kenneth W Kinzler; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Ralph H Hruban; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Identification of molecular subtypes of gastric cancer with different responses to PI3-kinase inhibitors and 5-fluorouracil.

Authors:  Zhengdeng Lei; Iain Beehuat Tan; Kakoli Das; Niantao Deng; Hermioni Zouridis; Sharon Pattison; Clarinda Chua; Zhu Feng; Yeoh Khay Guan; Chia Huey Ooi; Tatiana Ivanova; Shenli Zhang; Minghui Lee; Jeanie Wu; Anna Ngo; Sravanthy Manesh; Elisabeth Tan; Bin Tean Teh; Jimmy Bok Yan So; Liang Kee Goh; Alex Boussioutas; Tony Kiat Hon Lim; Horst Flotow; Patrick Tan; Steven G Rozen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  Gastric cancer pathology and underlying molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Heike I Grabsch; Patrick Tan
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.588

5.  Endothelial RSPO3 Controls Vascular Stability and Pruning through Non-canonical WNT/Ca(2+)/NFAT Signaling.

Authors:  Beate Scholz; Claudia Korn; Jessica Wojtarowicz; Carolin Mogler; Iris Augustin; Michael Boutros; Christof Niehrs; Hellmut G Augustin
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Heteroplasmic mitochondrial DNA mutations in normal and tumour cells.

Authors:  Yiping He; Jian Wu; Devin C Dressman; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; Sanford D Markowitz; Victor E Velculescu; Luis A Diaz; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Thymidine Phosphorylase/β-tubulin III expressions predict the response in Chinese advanced gastric cancer patients receiving first-line capecitabine plus paclitaxel.

Authors:  Jing Gao; Ming Lu; Jing-Wei Yu; Yan-Yan Li; Lin Shen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Next-generation sequencing to guide cancer therapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey Gagan; Eliezer M Van Allen
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  DGIdb 2.0: mining clinically relevant drug-gene interactions.

Authors:  Alex H Wagner; Adam C Coffman; Benjamin J Ainscough; Nicholas C Spies; Zachary L Skidmore; Katie M Campbell; Kilannin Krysiak; Deng Pan; Joshua F McMichael; James M Eldred; Jason R Walker; Richard K Wilson; Elaine R Mardis; Malachi Griffith; Obi L Griffith
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  19 in total

1.  Genetic characteristics of gastric-type mucinous carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Eunhyang Park; Sang Wun Kim; Sunghoon Kim; Hyun-Soo Kim; Jung-Yun Lee; Young Tae Kim; Nam Hoon Cho
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Comparison of the Clinicopathological Characteristics and Genetic Alterations Between Patients with Gastric Cancer with or Without Helicobacter pylori Infection.

Authors:  Wen-Liang Fang; Kuo-Hung Huang; Shih-Ching Chang; Chien-Hsing Lin; Ming-Huang Chen; Yee Chao; Su-Shun Lo; Anna Fen-Yau Li; Chew-Wun Wu; Yi-Ming Shyr
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-02-22

Review 3.  Pathogenic and Therapeutic Role of H3K4 Family of Methylases and Demethylases in Cancers.

Authors:  Aman Kumar; Niti Kumari; Nayudu Nallabelli; Rajendra Prasad
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2019-04-03

4.  Expression and prognostic value of NSD1 and SETD2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its precursor lesions.

Authors:  Mark Ettel; Lili Zhao; Shula Schechter; Jiaqi Shi
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 5.306

5.  Integrated in silico analysis of LRP2 mutations to immunotherapy efficacy in pan-cancer cohort.

Authors:  Chunbo Li; Yan Ding; Xuyin Zhang; Keqin Hua
Journal:  Discov Oncol       Date:  2022-07-14

6.  Low MLL2 Protein Expression Is Associated With Fibrosis in Early Stage Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Satoe Numakura; Hiroshi Uozaki
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  PARI functions as a new transcriptional target of FOXM1 involved in gastric cancer development.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Xiaojuan Ye; Lizhi Chen; Qiong Wu; Yong Gao; Yandong Li
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 6.580

8.  Expression of LDL receptor-related proteins (LRPs) in common solid malignancies correlates with patient survival.

Authors:  Steven L Gonias; Nicki Karimi-Mostowfi; Sarah S Murray; Elisabetta Mantuano; Andrew S Gilder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Large-scale analysis of KMT2 mutations defines a distinctive molecular subset with treatment implication in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jingyuan Wang; Joanne Xiu; Yasmine Baca; Francesca Battaglin; Hiroyuki Arai; Natsuko Kawanishi; Shivani Soni; Wu Zhang; Joshua Millstein; Bodour Salhia; Richard M Goldberg; Philip A Philip; Andreas Seeber; Jimmy J Hwang; Anthony F Shields; John L Marshall; Igor Astsaturov; A Craig Lockhart; Zoran Gatalica; W Michael Korn; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Differences in Somatic Mutation Profiles between Korean Gastric Cancer and Gastric Adenoma Patients.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Taekyu Lee; Hae Jung Sul; Ki Cheol Park; Joonhong Park
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.