Literature DB >> 23592141

Unfavorable pathological complete response rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy epirubicin plus taxanes for locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer.

Yi Yin1, Pin Zhang2, Bing-He Xu1, Bai-Lin Zhang3, Qing Li1, Peng Yuan1, Rui-Gang Cai1, Jia-Yu Wang1, Xiang Wang3, Xiao-Zhou Xu3.   

Abstract

Anthracycline-Taxane chemotherapy is widely used in neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancers. However, there is limited data reported in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Here, we evaluated the pathologic responses and survival of neoadjuvant epirubicin and taxanes chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced TNBC to provide some useful information for clinical practice. A total of 43 patients with locally advanced TNBC were enrolled in this study. Patients were administered with epirubicin 75 mg/m(2) plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for at least 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR), which was defined as no residual invasive cancer, or only carcinoma in situ in both the excised breast and axillary lymph node, while relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were secondary endpoints. Thirty-nine (90.7%) patients were at clinical stages IIB-IIIC. Thirty-seven (86%) completed 4-6 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy, and objective response rate (ORR) was 81.4% (35/43). Forty-two patients underwent radical surgery subsequently. The pCR rate was 14.3% (6/42). The most common adverse events in neoadjuvant chemotherapy were nausea/vomiting (88.4%, 38/43) and neutropenia (88.4%). After a median follow-up period of 34.0 months, 3-year RFS and OS rate was 53.6% and 80.1%, respectively. All events of recurrence and death occurred in non-pCR patients, in whom the 3-year RFS and OS rates were 44.3% and 76.6%, respectively. This study suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin plus taxanes has a relatively low pCR rate and high early recurrence risk in locally advanced TNBC, which indicates the necessity for more efficacious treatment. Further study is needed to validate these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23592141     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-013-1108-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  22 in total

1.  Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies.

Authors:  Brian D Lehmann; Joshua A Bauer; Xi Chen; Melinda E Sanders; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Yu Shyr; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  William D Foulkes; Ian E Smith; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Current trends and controversies over pre-operative chemotherapy for women with operable breast cancer.

Authors:  Chikako Shimizu; Masashi Ando; Tsutomu Kouno; Noriyuki Katsumata; Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Predictive factors for the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hiroko Masuda; Norikazu Masuda; Yoshinori Kodama; Masami Ogawa; Michiko Karita; Jun Yamamura; Kazunori Tsukuda; Hiroyoshi Doihara; Shinichiro Miyoshi; Masayuki Mano; Shoji Nakamori; Toshimasa Tsujinaka
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 5.  Dissecting the heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Otto Metzger-Filho; Andrew Tutt; Evandro de Azambuja; Kamal S Saini; Giuseppe Viale; Sherene Loi; Ian Bradbury; Judith M Bliss; Hatem A Azim; Paul Ellis; Angelo Di Leo; José Baselga; Christos Sotiriou; Martine Piccart-Gebhart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; E Claire Dees; Lynda Sawyer; Lisa Gatti; Dominic T Moore; Frances Collichio; David W Ollila; Carolyn I Sartor; Mark L Graham; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options.

Authors:  Susan Cleator; Wolfgang Heller; R Charles Coombes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Platinum-based chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  B Sirohi; M Arnedos; S Popat; S Ashley; A Nerurkar; G Walsh; S Johnston; I E Smith
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Preoperative weekly cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel with G-CSF support in triple-negative large operable breast cancer.

Authors:  G Frasci; P Comella; M Rinaldo; G Iodice; M Di Bonito; M D'Aiuto; A Petrillo; S Lastoria; C Siani; G Comella; G D'Aiuto
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Prognostic impact of clinicopathologic parameters in stage II/III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel and doxorubicin chemotherapy: paradoxical features of the triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Bhumsuk Keam; Seock-Ah Im; Hee-Jun Kim; Do-Youn Oh; Jee Hyun Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Eui Kyu Chie; Wonshik Han; Dong-Wan Kim; Woo Kyung Moon; Tae-You Kim; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh; Dae Seog Heo; Sung Whan Ha; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  5 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for different molecular breast cancer subtypes: a retrospective study in Russian population.

Authors:  Nataliya Babyshkina; Elena Malinovskaya; Stanislav Patalyak; Olga Bragina; Natalia Tarabanovskaya; Artem Doroshenko; Elena Slonimskaya; Vladimir Perelmuter; Nadejda Cherdyntseva
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Therapeutic response to a novel enzyme-targeting radiosensitization treatment (KORTUC II) for residual lesions in patients with stage IV primary breast cancer, following induction chemotherapy with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide or taxane.

Authors:  Nobutaka Aoyama; Yasuhiro Ogawa; Miki Yasuoka; Hitomi Iwasa; Kana Miyatake; Rika Yoshimatsu; Tomoaki Yamanishi; Norihiko Hamada; Taiji Tamura; Kana Kobayashi; Yoriko Murata; Takuji Yamagami; Mitsuhiko Miyamura
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Therapeutic results of a novel enzyme-targeting radiosensitization treatment, Kochi oxydol-radiation therapy for unresectable carcinomas II, in patients with stage I primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Nobutaka Aoyama; Yasuhiro Ogawa; Miki Yasuoka; Kenta Ohgi; Hitomi Iwasa; Kana Miyatake; Rika Yoshimatsu; Tomoaki Yamanishi; Norihiko Hamada; Taiji Tamura; Kana Kobayashi; Yoriko Murata; Mitsuhiko Miyamura; Takuji Yamagami
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Efficacy and Safety of Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin vs. Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Treatment of Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer After Failure with Anthracyclines and Taxanes.

Authors:  Junbin Wang; Rongsheng Zheng; Zishu Wang; Yan Yang; Mingxi Wang; Weiyan Zou
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-09-28

5.  A randomized and open-label phase II trial reports the efficacy of neoadjuvant lobaplatin in breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiujuan Wu; Peng Tang; Shifei Li; Shushu Wang; Yueyang Liang; Ling Zhong; Lin Ren; Ting Zhang; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.