Literature DB >> 25139196

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for different molecular breast cancer subtypes: a retrospective study in Russian population.

Nataliya Babyshkina1, Elena Malinovskaya, Stanislav Patalyak, Olga Bragina, Natalia Tarabanovskaya, Artem Doroshenko, Elena Slonimskaya, Vladimir Perelmuter, Nadejda Cherdyntseva.   

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the objective clinical response (cOR), pathological complete response (pCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) in 231 Russian patients with four subtypes of breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. About 130 (56.3 %) patients received anthracycline-based, 56 (24.2 %) capecitabine-containing (CAX), 28 (12.1 %) taxotere and 17 (7.4 %) non-anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimens at the Tomsk Cancer Research Institute between 2000 and 2010. Tumors were subtyped according to the hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemical data. The majority of tumors (48.9 %) were ER+/PR+ and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-), 10.4 % were ER+ PR+ and HER2-positive (HR+/HER2+), 9.1 % were ER-/PR- and HER2-overexpressed (HER2-enriched) and 31.6 % were ER-/PR- and HER2-negative (triple negative). Both cOR and pCR were significantly higher in the triple-negative tumors compared to the other subtypes (P = 0.021 and P = 0.033, respectively). Among the four chemotherapy regimens, only CAX regimen had a predictive value for cOR (HR 2.30, 95 % CI 1.16-4.58, P = 0.009). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the triple-negative subtype (HR 2.54, 95 % CI 1.06-1.42, P = 0.011) and CAX regimen (HR 3.01, 95 % CI 1.01-1.46, P = 0.002) were significantly associated with cOR. No association between patient's PFS and a tumor subtype was observed. However, there was a trend for a prolonged PFS among patients with cOR (P = 0.056). Our data indicate a potentially better prognosis for triple-negative breast cancer patients if treated with the CAX neoadjuvant regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25139196     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-014-0165-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  62 in total

1.  [New approaches to the treatment of breast cancer].

Authors:  V F Semiglazov
Journal:  Vopr Onkol       Date:  2013

2.  Prognostic significance of subtype and pathologic response in operable breast cancer; a pooled analysis of prospective neoadjuvant studies of JBCRG.

Authors:  Katsumasa Kuroi; Masakazu Toi; Shinji Ohno; Seigo Nakamura; Hiroji Iwata; Norikazu Masuda; Nobuaki Sato; Hitoshi Tsuda; Masafumi Kurosumi; Futoshi Akiyama
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 4.239

3.  Predictive role of molecular subtypes in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients in Northeast China.

Authors:  Minhao Lv; Beibei Li; Yongfeng Li; Xiaoyun Mao; Fan Yao; Feng Jin
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2011

4.  Assignment of tumor subtype by genomic testing and pathologic-based approximations: implications on patient's management and therapy selection.

Authors:  A Romero; A Prat; J A García-Sáenz; N Del Prado; A Pelayo; V Furió; J M Román; M de la Hoya; E Díaz-Rubio; C M Perou; T Cladés; M Martín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Analysis of complete response by MRI following neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts pathological tumor responses differently for molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Yuji Hayashi; Hiroyuki Takei; Satoshi Nozu; Yoshihiro Tochigi; Akihiro Ichikawa; Naoki Kobayashi; Masafumi Kurosumi; Kenichi Inoue; Takashi Yoshida; Shigenori E Nagai; Hanako Oba; Toshio Tabei; Jun Horiguchi; Izumi Takeyoshi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  The relevance of breast cancer subtypes in the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M E Straver; E J Th Rutgers; S Rodenhuis; S C Linn; C E Loo; J Wesseling; N S Russell; H S A Oldenburg; N Antonini; M T F D Vrancken Peeters
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Relationship between intrinsic subtypes and tumor responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Asako Ooe; Sachiko Takahara; Kazuhiro Sumiyoshi; Hitoshi Yamamoto; Jun Kawai; Eiichi Shiba
Journal:  Breast Dis       Date:  2012

8.  Impact of immunohistochemistry-based molecular subtype on chemosensitivity and survival in patients with breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Changhoon Yoo; Jin-Hee Ahn; Kyung Hae Jung; Sung-Bae Kim; Hak-Hee Kim; Hee Jung Shin; Sei Hyun Ahn; Byung Ho Son; Gyungyub Gong
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.588

9.  Breast cancer subtyping by immunohistochemistry and histological grade outperforms breast cancer intrinsic subtypes in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.

Authors:  E H Lips; L Mulder; J J de Ronde; I A M Mandjes; B B Koolen; L F A Wessels; S Rodenhuis; J Wesseling
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  The relevance of the intrinsic subtype to the clinicopathological features and biomarkers in Japanese breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Masako Tamaki; Takako Kamio; Shingo Kameoka; Noriko Kojimahara; Toshio Nishikawa
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  4 in total

1.  Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics analysis for prediction of breast cancers insensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Qianqian Xiong; Xuezhi Zhou; Zhenyu Liu; Chuqian Lei; Ciqiu Yang; Mei Yang; Liulu Zhang; Teng Zhu; Xiaosheng Zhuang; Changhong Liang; Zaiyi Liu; Jie Tian; Kun Wang
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 2 in triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nataliya Babyshkina; Marina Zavyalova; Natalia Tarabanovskaya; Tatyana Dronova; Nadejda Krakhmal; Elena Slonimskaya; Julia Kzhyshkowska; Evgeny Choynzonov; Nadejda Cherdyntseva
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 3.  The development of molecular typing in canine mammary carcinomas.

Authors:  Huihua Zheng; Chongtao Du; Xinyue Tang; Yuzhu Zhang; Ronglei Huang; Chao Yu; Guanghong Xie
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Predictors of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Iranian Breast Cancer Patients

Authors:  Pegah Sasanpour; Saleh Sandoughdaran; Alireza Mosavi-Jarrahi; Mona Malekzadeh
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-09-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.