Literature DB >> 23589844

Widespread distribution and unexpected variation among science faculty with education specialties (SFES) across the United States.

Seth D Bush1, Nancy J Pelaez, James A Rudd, Michael T Stevens, Kimberly D Tanner, Kathy S Williams.   

Abstract

College and university science departments are increasingly taking an active role in improving science education. Perhaps as a result, a new type of specialized science faculty position within science departments is emerging--referred to here as science faculty with education specialties (SFES)--where individual scientists focus their professional efforts on strengthening undergraduate science education, improving kindergarten-through-12th grade science education, and conducting discipline-based education research. Numerous assertions, assumptions, and questions about SFES exist, yet no national studies have been published. Here, we present findings from a large-scale study of US SFES, who are widespread and increasing in numbers. Contrary to many assumptions, SFES were indeed found across the nation, across science disciplines, and, most notably, across primarily undergraduate, master of science-granting, and PhD-granting institutions. Data also reveal unexpected variations among SFES by institution type. Among respondents, SFES at master of science-granting institutions were almost twice as likely to have formal training in science education compared with other SFES. In addition, SFES at PhD-granting institutions were much more likely to have obtained science education funding. Surprisingly, formal training in science education provided no advantage in obtaining science education funding. Our findings show that the SFES phenomenon is likely more complex and diverse than anticipated, with differences being more evident across institution types than across science disciplines. These findings raise questions about the origins of differences among SFES and are useful to science departments interested in hiring SFES, scientific trainees preparing for SFES careers, and agencies awarding science education funding.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23589844      PMCID: PMC3645507          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1218821110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  The pipeline. Science faculty with education specialties.

Authors:  S D Bush; N J Pelaez; J A Rudd; M T Stevens; K D Tanner; K S Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages.

Authors:  Q McNEMAR
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1947-06       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Investigation of science faculty with education specialties within the largest university system in the United States.

Authors:  Seth D Bush; Nancy J Pelaez; James A Rudd; Michael T Stevens; Kimberly D Tanner; Kathy S Williams
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.325

  3 in total
  11 in total

1.  Promoting inquiry-based teaching in laboratory courses: are we meeting the grade?

Authors:  Christopher Beck; Amy Butler; Karen Burke da Silva
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Making the Grade: Using Instructional Feedback and Evaluation to Inspire Evidence-Based Teaching.

Authors:  Peggy Brickman; Cara Gormally; Amedee Marchand Martella
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Within and beyond Biology Education Research: Steps toward Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration.

Authors:  Erin L Dolan
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Evolving roles of scientists as change agents in science education over a decade: SFES roles beyond discipline-based education research.

Authors:  Seth D Bush; Michael T Stevens; Kimberly D Tanner; Kathy S Williams
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Characterizing the University of California's tenure-track teaching position from the faculty and administrator perspectives.

Authors:  Ashley Harlow; Stanley M Lo; Kem Saichaie; Brian K Sato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Redefining authentic research experiences in introductory biology laboratories and barriers to their implementation.

Authors:  Rachelle M Spell; Judith A Guinan; Kristen R Miller; Christopher W Beck
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Fostering Change from Within: Influencing Teaching Practices of Departmental Colleagues by Science Faculty with Education Specialties.

Authors:  Seth D Bush; James A Rudd; Michael T Stevens; Kimberly D Tanner; Kathy S Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Modeling Sources of Teaching Self-Efficacy for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Graduate Teaching Assistants.

Authors:  Sue Ellen DeChenne; Natalie Koziol; Mark Needham; Larry Enochs
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  A Community-Building Framework for Collaborative Research Coordination across the Education and Biology Research Disciplines.

Authors:  Nancy Pelaez; Trevor R Anderson; Stephanie M Gardner; Yue Yin; Joel K Abraham; Edward L Bartlett; Cara Gormally; Carol A Hurney; Tammy M Long; Dina L Newman; Karen Sirum; Michael T Stevens
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Disciplinary Bias, Money Matters, and Persistence: Deans' Perspectives on Science Faculty with Education Specialties (SFES).

Authors:  Seth D Bush; Michael T Stevens; Kimberly D Tanner; Kathy S Williams
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.