AIMS: This study investigated the incremental role of echocardiographic-contrast particle image velocimetry (Echo-PIV) in patients with heart failure (HF) for measuring changes in left ventricular (LV) vortex strength (VS) during phases of a cardiac cycle. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echo-PIV was performed in 42 patients, including 23 HF patients and 19 controls. VS was measured as a fluid-dynamic parameter that integrates blood flow rotation over a given area and correlated with non-invasively derived indices of LV mechanical performance. In comparison with early and late diastole, the VS was higher during isovolumic contraction (IC) for control and HF patients with the preserved ejection fraction (P = 0.002 and P = 0.01, respectively), but not for HF patients with the reduced ejection fraction (P = 0.41). On multivariable regression analysis, the VS during IC (VSIC) was independently related to late-diastolic VS and LV longitudinal strain (R(2)= 0.63, P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Patients in whom diastolic VS was augmented during IC showed a higher LV stroke volume (P = 0.01), stroke work (P = 0.02), and mechanical efficiency (P = 0.008). Over a median follow-up period of 2.9 years, eight (34%) HF patients were hospitalized for decompensated HF. In comparison with the rest, these eight patients showed markedly reduced longitudinal strain (P = 0.002), and lower change in VS (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data suggest that the persistence of vortex from late diastole into IC is a haemodynamic measure of coupling between diastole and systole. The change in VS is correlated with LV mechanical performance and shows association with adverse clinical outcomes seen in HF patients.
AIMS: This study investigated the incremental role of echocardiographic-contrast particle image velocimetry (Echo-PIV) in patients with heart failure (HF) for measuring changes in left ventricular (LV) vortex strength (VS) during phases of a cardiac cycle. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echo-PIV was performed in 42 patients, including 23 HF patients and 19 controls. VS was measured as a fluid-dynamic parameter that integrates blood flow rotation over a given area and correlated with non-invasively derived indices of LV mechanical performance. In comparison with early and late diastole, the VS was higher during isovolumic contraction (IC) for control and HF patients with the preserved ejection fraction (P = 0.002 and P = 0.01, respectively), but not for HF patients with the reduced ejection fraction (P = 0.41). On multivariable regression analysis, the VS during IC (VSIC) was independently related to late-diastolic VS and LV longitudinal strain (R(2)= 0.63, P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Patients in whom diastolic VS was augmented during IC showed a higher LV stroke volume (P = 0.01), stroke work (P = 0.02), and mechanical efficiency (P = 0.008). Over a median follow-up period of 2.9 years, eight (34%) HF patients were hospitalized for decompensated HF. In comparison with the rest, these eight patients showed markedly reduced longitudinal strain (P = 0.002), and lower change in VS (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data suggest that the persistence of vortex from late diastole into IC is a haemodynamic measure of coupling between diastole and systole. The change in VS is correlated with LV mechanical performance and shows association with adverse clinical outcomes seen in HF patients.
Authors: Gianni Pedrizzetti; Alfonso R Martiniello; Valter Bianchi; Antonio D'Onofrio; Pio Caso; Giovanni Tonti Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Mohammed S M Elbaz; Emmeline E Calkoen; Jos J M Westenberg; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt; Arno A W Roest; Rob J van der Geest Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2014-09-27 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Javier Bermejo; Yolanda Benito; Marta Alhama; Raquel Yotti; Pablo Martínez-Legazpi; Candelas Pérez Del Villar; Esther Pérez-David; Ana González-Mansilla; Cristina Santa-Marta; Alicia Barrio; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Juan C Del Álamo Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Michal Schäfer; Stephen Humphries; Kurt R Stenmark; Vitaly O Kheyfets; J Kern Buckner; Kendall S Hunter; Brett E Fenster Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Leonid Goubergrits; Katharina Vellguth; Lukas Obermeier; Adriano Schlief; Lennart Tautz; Jan Bruening; Hans Lamecker; Angelika Szengel; Olena Nemchyna; Christoph Knosalla; Titus Kuehne; Natalia Solowjowa Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-07-05
Authors: Valter Bianchi; Alfonso R Martiniello; Jan Mangual; Vincenzo Tavoletta; Gianni Pedrizzetti; Giovanni Tonti; Valentina Maria Caso; Pio Caso; Antonio D'Onofrio Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 1.900