Literature DB >> 23588749

Use of medications to reduce risk for primary breast cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Heidi D Nelson1, M E Beth Smith, Jessica C Griffin, Rongwei Fu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medications to reduce risk for primary breast cancer are recommended for women at increased risk; however, use is low.
PURPOSE: To update evidence about the effectiveness and adverse effects of medications to reduce breast cancer risk, patient use of such medications, and methods for identifying women at increased risk for breast cancer. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases (through 5 December 2012), Scopus, Web of Science, clinical trial registries, and reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: English-language randomized trials of medication effectiveness and adverse effects, observational studies of adverse effects and patient use, and diagnostic accuracy studies of risk assessment. DATA EXTRACTION: Investigators independently extracted data on participants, study design, analysis, follow-up, and results, and a second investigator confirmed key data. Investigators independently dual-rated study quality and applicability using established criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seven good- and fair-quality trials indicated that tamoxifen and raloxifene reduced incidence of invasive breast cancer by 7 to 9 cases in 1000 women over 5 years compared with placebo. New results from STAR (Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene) showed that tamoxifen reduced breast cancer incidence more than raloxifene by 5 cases in 1000 women. Neither reduced breast cancer-specific or all-cause mortality rates. Both reduced the incidence of fractures, but tamoxifen increased the incidence of thromboembolic events more than raloxifene by 4 cases in 1000 women. Tamoxifen increased the incidence of endometrial cancer and cataracts compared with placebo and raloxifene. Trials provided limited and heterogeneous data on medication adherence and persistence. Many women do not take tamoxifen because of associated harms. Thirteen risk-stratification models were modest predictors of breast cancer. LIMITATION: Data on mortality and adherence measures and for women who are nonwhite, are premenopausal, or have comorbid conditions were lacking.
CONCLUSION: Medications reduced the incidence of invasive breast cancer and fractures and increased the incidence of thromboembolic events. Tamoxifen was more effective than raloxifene but also increased the incidence of endometrial cancer and cataracts. Use is limited by adverse effects and inaccurate methods to identify candidates. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23588749     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  44 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Chemoprevention among High-risk Women and those with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Laura L Reimers; Parijatham S Sivasubramanian; Dawn Hershman; Mary Beth Terry; Heather Greenlee; Julie Campbell; Kevin Kalinsky; Matthew Maurer; Ramona Jayasena; Rossy Sandoval; Maria Alvarez; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Affective forecasting and medication decision making in breast-cancer prevention.

Authors:  Michael Hoerger; Laura D Scherer; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 3.  Skeletal manifestations of treatment of breast cancer on premenopausal women.

Authors:  Loomee Doo; Charles L Shapiro
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Chemoprevention Uptake among Women with Atypical Hyperplasia and Lobular and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Meghna S Trivedi; Austin M Coe; Alejandro Vanegas; Rita Kukafka; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2017-06-13

5.  Primary chemoprevention of breast cancer: Are the adverse effects too burdensome?

Authors:  Vinay Prasad; Marie Diener-West
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Addressing barriers to uptake of breast cancer chemoprevention for patients and providers.

Authors:  Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2015

7.  Factors Associated with Interest in Gene-Panel Testing and Risk Communication Preferences in Women from BRCA1/2 Negative Families.

Authors:  Kristina G Flores; Laurie E Steffen; Christopher J McLouth; Belinda E Vicuña; Amanda Gammon; Wendy Kohlmann; Lucretia Vigil; Zoneddy R Dayao; Melanie E Royce; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Acceptance and adherence to chemoprevention among women at increased risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Ji-Hyun Lee; William Fulp; Elizabeth Matos Gomez; Elissa Clayton; Sharon Tollin; Nazanin Khakpour; Christine Laronga; Marie Catherine Lee; John V Kiluk
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Barriers and Facilitators to Patient-Provider Communication When Discussing Breast Cancer Risk to Aid in the Development of Decision Support Tools.

Authors:  Haeseung Yi; Tong Xiao; Parijatham S Thomas; Alejandra N Aguirre; Cindy Smalletz; Jill Dimond; Joseph Finkelstein; Katherine Infante; Meghna Trivedi; Raven David; Jennifer Vargas; Katherine D Crew; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

Review 10.  Molecular cancer prevention: Current status and future directions.

Authors:  Karen Colbert Maresso; Kenneth Y Tsai; Powel H Brown; Eva Szabo; Scott Lippman; Ernest T Hawk
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 508.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.