Literature DB >> 2358867

Determinants of horizontal sound location selectivity of binaurally excited neurons in an isofrequency region of the mustache bat inferior colliculus.

Z M Fuzessery1, J J Wenstrup, G D Pollak.   

Abstract

1. The monaural and binaural response properties and the horizontal sound location sensitivity of 78 binaurally excited neurons from 26 bats were examined with a combined closed-field and free-field stimulation paradigm. The aim was to determine how the response properties of these neurons shape their selectivity for auditory space. All neurons were recorded within a single, greatly enlarged isofrequency (60 kHz) region of the mustache bat's central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC). In this and two companion papers (Wenstrup et al. 1988a,b) that focused on binaurally inhibited neurons in this isofrequency region, our goal was to examine the neural mechanisms for binaural processing within a single frequency channel of the primary auditory system. 2. Binaurally excited neurons were defined as either excited by monaural input from both ears or, if excited by monaural stimulation of only one ear, facilitated by binaural stimulation. Some neurons also exhibited binaural inhibition. These neurons were divided into functional classes based on their responses to monaural and binaural stimulation presented under dichotic, closed-field conditions. The following notation was used: response to contralateral stimulation (E, excitatory; O, no effect), response to ipsilateral stimulation (E, excitatory; O, no effect)/response to binaural stimulation (F, facilitatory; I, inhibitory; O, no effect). Seven functional classes were observed: EE/O, EE/F, EE/I, EE/FI, EO/F, EO/FI, and OO/F. 3. Among EE neurons, thresholds for contralateral monaural stimulation were typically lower than for ipsilateral stimulation, and response magnitudes for contralateral stimulation were typically greater. Among EO/F and EO/FI neurons, only one eye, an OE/FI neuron, was excited by ipsilateral monaural stimulation. These results suggest that contralateral input provides the dominant excitatory influence. EE/FI and EO/FI neurons, which exhibited both binaural facilitation and inhibition, were typically inhibited at interaural intensity differences (IIDs) favoring the ipsilateral ear, suggesting that ipsilateral input provides the dominant inhibitory influence. 4. Neurons were tested over the range of naturally occurring IIDs (+/- 30 dB) at intensities of -20 to 30 dB relative to threshold. The IID functions of these neurons assumed three configurations: flat, with facilitation occurring at all IIDs; stepped, with facilitation occurring over part of the IID range, and peaked, with facilitation occurring over a limited band of IIDs. The majority of cells (90%) exhibited peaked IID functions, and most of these (73%), regardless of functional class, were maximally facilitated at an IID of 0 dB. 5. Neurons differed considerably in the strength of their binaural interactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2358867     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1990.63.5.1128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

1.  Robustness of a neural network model for differencing.

Authors:  A Solodovnikov; M C Reed
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  GABA shapes a systematic map of binaural sensitivity in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Khaleel A Razak; Zoltan M Fuzessery
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Specialization of binaural responses in ventral auditory cortices.

Authors:  Nathan C Higgins; Douglas A Storace; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Systematic representation of sound locations in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Mechanisms underlying azimuth selectivity in the auditory cortex of the pallid bat.

Authors:  K A Razak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Spatial processing within the mustache bat echolocation system: possible mechanisms for optimization.

Authors:  Z M Fuzessery; D J Hartley; J J Wenstrup
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Synaptic mechanisms underlying interaural level difference selectivity in rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Michael Kyweriga; Whitney Stewart; Carolyn Cahill; Michael Wehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Comparison of auditory responses in the medial geniculate and pontine gray of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  Kimberly Miller; Ellen Covey
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.208

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.