OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to identify partner attributes associated with sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among adolescents and to summarize implications for research and prevention. DESIGN: The design of this study was systematic review. METHODS: We identified peer-reviewed studies published in 1990 through 2010 that assessed 1 or more partner attributes in relation to a biologically confirmed STI among adolescents (15-24 years) by searching MEDLINE and included articles. Studies that included adolescents but more than 50% of the sample or with mean or median age of 25 years or greater were excluded. RESULTS: Sixty-four studies met the eligibility criteria; 61% were conducted in high-income countries; 80% were cross sectional; and 91% enrolled females and 42% enrolled males. There was no standard "partner" definition. Partner attributes assessed most frequently included the following: age, race/ethnicity, multiple sex partners, and STI symptoms. Older partners were associated with prevalent STIs but largely unrelated to incidence. Black race was associated with STIs but not uniformly. Partners with multiple partners and STI symptoms seem to be associated with STIs predominantly among females. Although significant associations were reported, weaker evidence exists for the following: other partner sociodemographics, sexual and other behaviors (sexual concurrency, intimate partner violence, substance use, travel), and STI history. There were no apparent differences by STI. CONCLUSIONS: Partner attributes are independently associated with STIs among male and female adolescents worldwide. These findings reinforce the importance of assessing partner attributes when determining STI risk. Prevention efforts should continue to promote and address barriers to condom use. Increased efforts are needed to screen and treat STIs and reduce risky behavior among men. A standard partner definition would facilitate the interpretation of findings in future studies.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to identify partner attributes associated with sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among adolescents and to summarize implications for research and prevention. DESIGN: The design of this study was systematic review. METHODS: We identified peer-reviewed studies published in 1990 through 2010 that assessed 1 or more partner attributes in relation to a biologically confirmed STI among adolescents (15-24 years) by searching MEDLINE and included articles. Studies that included adolescents but more than 50% of the sample or with mean or median age of 25 years or greater were excluded. RESULTS: Sixty-four studies met the eligibility criteria; 61% were conducted in high-income countries; 80% were cross sectional; and 91% enrolled females and 42% enrolled males. There was no standard "partner" definition. Partner attributes assessed most frequently included the following: age, race/ethnicity, multiple sex partners, and STI symptoms. Older partners were associated with prevalent STIs but largely unrelated to incidence. Black race was associated with STIs but not uniformly. Partners with multiple partners and STI symptoms seem to be associated with STIs predominantly among females. Although significant associations were reported, weaker evidence exists for the following: other partner sociodemographics, sexual and other behaviors (sexual concurrency, intimate partner violence, substance use, travel), and STI history. There were no apparent differences by STI. CONCLUSIONS: Partner attributes are independently associated with STIs among male and female adolescents worldwide. These findings reinforce the importance of assessing partner attributes when determining STI risk. Prevention efforts should continue to promote and address barriers to condom use. Increased efforts are needed to screen and treat STIs and reduce risky behavior among men. A standard partner definition would facilitate the interpretation of findings in future studies.
Authors: Manya Magnus; Julia A Schillinger; J Dennis Fortenberry; Stuart M Berman; Patricia Kissinger Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2006-07-10 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Audrey E Pettifor; Immo Kleinschmidt; Jonathan Levin; Helen V Rees; Catherine MacPhail; Lindiwe Madikizela-Hlongwa; Kerry Vermaak; Grant Napier; Wendy Stevens; Nancy S Padian Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: S O Aral; J P Hughes; B Stoner; W Whittington; H H Handsfield; R M Anderson; K K Holmes Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: R Jewkes; K Dunkle; M Nduna; J Levin; N Jama; N Khuzwayo; M Koss; A Puren; N Duvvury Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2006-10-09 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Christopher B Hurt; Derrick D Matthews; Molly S Calabria; Kelly A Green; Adaora A Adimora; Carol E Golin; Lisa B Hightow-Weidman Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Sanyukta Mathur; Ying Wei; Xiaobo Zhong; Xiaoyu Song; Fred Nalugoda; Tom Lutalo; Maria Wawer; Ron Gray; David Serwadda; John S Santelli Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Joan Marie Kraft; Maura K Whiteman; Marion W Carter; M Christine Snead; Ralph J DiClemente; Collen Crittenden Murray; Kendra Hatfield-Timajchy; Melissa Kottke Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Wilson Vincent; Derrick M Gordon; Christina Campbell; Nadia L Ward; Tashuna Albritton; Trace Kershaw Journal: Psychol Men Masc Date: 2015-06-29
Authors: Stephanie A S Staras; Melvin D Livingston; Mildred M Maldonado-Molina; Kelli A Komro Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2013-08-08 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Andrea Swartzendruber; Jessica M Sales; Jennifer L Brown; Ralph J Diclemente; Eve S Rose Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Oluwasolape Olawore; Trevor A Crowell; Sosthenes C Ketende; Habib O Ramadhani; Hongjie Liu; Julie A Ake; Afoke Kokogho; Sylvia Adebajo; Man E Charurat; Rebecca G Nowak; Stefan D Baral Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 3.295