Literature DB >> 23588112

The influence of patient and wound variables on healing of venous leg ulcers in a randomized controlled trial of growth-arrested allogeneic keratinocytes and fibroblasts.

John C Lantis1, William A Marston, Alik Farber, Robert S Kirsner, Yuxin Zhang, Tommy D Lee, D Innes Cargill, Herbert B Slade.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient and wound variables presumed to influence healing outcomes in the context of therapeutic trials for chronic venous leg ulcers.
METHODS: This double-blind, vehicle-controlled study was conducted with randomized assignment to one of four cell therapy dose groups (n = 46, 43, 44, 45) or vehicle control (n = 50). A 2-week run-in period was used to exclude rapid healers and those with infection or uncontrolled edema. This was a multicenter (ambulatory, private, hospital-based and university-based practices, and wound care centers in North America) study. Adults ≥ 18 years old with chronic venous insufficiency associated with an uninfected venous leg ulcer (2-12 cm(2) area, 6-104 weeks' duration) were included in the study. Excluded were pregnant or lactating women, wounds with exposed muscle, tendon or bone, patients unable to tolerate compression bandages, or patients who had exclusionary medical conditions or exposure to certain products. Exclusion during run-in included patients with infection, uncontrolled severe edema or with healing rates ≥ 0.349 cm/2 wk. Screen fail rate was 37% (134/362), and the withdrawal rate was~10% (23 of 228). Growth-arrested neonatal dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes were delivered via pump spray in a fibrin sealant-based matrix, plus a foam dressing and four-layer compression bandaging. Treatment continued for 12 weeks or until healed, whichever occurred first. Patient demographic and wound-related variables were evaluated for influence on complete wound healing in all patients, as well as the subsets of treated and control patients.
RESULTS: Wound duration (P = .004) and the presence of specific quantities of certain bacterial species (P < .001) affected healing in the vehicle group, while healing in the cell-treated groups was influenced by wound duration (P = .012), wound area (P = .026), wound location (P = .011), and specific quantities of certain bacterial species (P = .002). Age, sex, race, diabetes, HbA1C, peripheral neuropathy, and serum prealbumin did not significantly affect healing. Body mass index was positively associated with healing in cell-treated patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Wound duration is a quantifiable surrogate for one or more undefined variables that can have a profound negative effect on venous leg ulcer healing. Although cell therapy overcame barriers to healing, the only specific barrier identified was the presence of certain bacterial species. Interventional trials of potentially effective new therapies can be most informative when patients with suspected barriers to healing are included. The specific measurement of candidate barriers such as microbial pathogens, wound inflammatory state, and fibroblast function should be considered in future randomized trials to improve our understanding of the basis for chronicity.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23588112     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  15 in total

Review 1.  Association Between Microbial Bioburden and Healing Outcomes in Venous Leg Ulcers: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Marie S Tuttle
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Chronic wound repair and healing in older adults: current status and future research.

Authors:  Lisa Gould; Peter Abadir; Harold Brem; Marissa Carter; Teresa Conner-Kerr; Jeff Davidson; Luisa DiPietro; Vincent Falanga; Caroline Fife; Sue Gardner; Elizabeth Grice; John Harmon; William R Hazzard; Kevin P High; Pamela Houghton; Nasreen Jacobson; Robert S Kirsner; Elizabeth J Kovacs; David Margolis; Frances McFarland Horne; May J Reed; Dennis H Sullivan; Stephen Thom; Marjana Tomic-Canic; Jeremy Walston; Jo Anne Whitney; John Williams; Susan Zieman; Kenneth Schmader
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 3.  Hydrogel dressings for venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Cibele Td Ribeiro; Fernando Al Dias; Guilherme Af Fregonezi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-05

4.  Chronic wound repair and healing in older adults: current status and future research.

Authors:  Lisa Gould; Peter Abadir; Harold Brem; Marissa Carter; Teresa Conner-Kerr; Jeff Davidson; Luisa DiPietro; Vincent Falanga; Caroline Fife; Sue Gardner; Elizabeth Grice; John Harmon; William R Hazzard; Kevin P High; Pamela Houghton; Nasreen Jacobson; Robert S Kirsner; Elizabeth J Kovacs; David Margolis; Frances McFarland Horne; May J Reed; Dennis H Sullivan; Stephen Thom; Marjana Tomic-Canic; Jeremy Walston; JoAnne Whitney; John Williams; Susan Zieman; Kenneth Schmader
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.617

5.  The Wound Healing Index for Predicting Venous Leg Ulcer Outcome.

Authors:  Caroline E Fife; Susan D Horn
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  Protease-modulating matrix treatments for healing venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Maggie J Westby; Gill Norman; Jo C Dumville; Nikki Stubbs; Nicky Cullum
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-15

Review 7.  Protease activity as a prognostic factor for wound healing in venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Maggie J Westby; Jo C Dumville; Nikki Stubbs; Gill Norman; Jason Kf Wong; Nicky Cullum; Richard D Riley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-01

8.  Statin therapy for venous ulcers.

Authors:  J E Dickerson; H B Slade
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 9.302

9.  Comparative Genomic, MicroRNA, and Tissue Analyses Reveal Subtle Differences between Non-Diabetic and Diabetic Foot Skin.

Authors:  Horacio A Ramirez; Liang Liang; Irena Pastar; Ashley M Rosa; Olivera Stojadinovic; Thomas G Zwick; Robert S Kirsner; Anna G Maione; Jonathan A Garlick; Marjana Tomic-Canic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Dressings and topical agents for treating venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Gill Norman; Maggie J Westby; Amber D Rithalia; Nikki Stubbs; Marta O Soares; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.