OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the costs and outcomes of offering the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10) and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in Thailand compared to the current situation of no PCV vaccination. METHODS: Two vaccination schedules were considered: two-dose primary series plus a booster dose (2+1) and three-dose primary series plus a booster dose (3+1). A cost-utility analysis was conducted using a societal perspective. A Markov simulation model was used to estimate the relevant costs and health outcomes for a lifetime horizon. Costs were collected and values were calculated for the year 2010. The results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in Thai Baht (THB) per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained, with future costs and outcomes being discounted at 3% per annum. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation were performed to assess parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: Under the base case-scenario of 2+1 dose schedule and a five-year protection, without indirect vaccine effects, the ICER for PCV10 and PCV13 were THB 1,368,072 and THB 1,490,305 per QALY gained, respectively. With indirect vaccine effects, the ICER of PCV10 was THB 519,399, and for PCV13 was THB 527,378. The model was sensitive to discount rate, the change in duration of vaccine protection and the incidence of pneumonia for all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: At current prices, PCV10 and PCV13 are not cost-effective in Thailand. Inclusion of indirect vaccine effects substantially reduced the ICERs for both vaccines, but did not result in cost effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the costs and outcomes of offering the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10) and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in Thailand compared to the current situation of no PCV vaccination. METHODS: Two vaccination schedules were considered: two-dose primary series plus a booster dose (2+1) and three-dose primary series plus a booster dose (3+1). A cost-utility analysis was conducted using a societal perspective. A Markov simulation model was used to estimate the relevant costs and health outcomes for a lifetime horizon. Costs were collected and values were calculated for the year 2010. The results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in Thai Baht (THB) per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained, with future costs and outcomes being discounted at 3% per annum. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation were performed to assess parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: Under the base case-scenario of 2+1 dose schedule and a five-year protection, without indirect vaccine effects, the ICER for PCV10 and PCV13 were THB 1,368,072 and THB 1,490,305 per QALY gained, respectively. With indirect vaccine effects, the ICER of PCV10 was THB 519,399, and for PCV13 was THB 527,378. The model was sensitive to discount rate, the change in duration of vaccine protection and the incidence of pneumonia for all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: At current prices, PCV10 and PCV13 are not cost-effective in Thailand. Inclusion of indirect vaccine effects substantially reduced the ICERs for both vaccines, but did not result in cost effectiveness.
Authors: S Black; H Shinefield; B Fireman; E Lewis; P Ray; J R Hansen; L Elvin; K M Ensor; J Hackell; G Siber; F Malinoski; D Madore; I Chang; R Kohberger; W Watson; R Austrian; K Edwards Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Cynthia G Whitney; Monica M Farley; James Hadler; Lee H Harrison; Nancy M Bennett; Ruth Lynfield; Arthur Reingold; Paul R Cieslak; Tamara Pilishvili; Delois Jackson; Richard R Facklam; James H Jorgensen; Anne Schuchat Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-05-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James R G Butler; Peter McIntyre; C Raina MacIntyre; Robin Gilmour; Ann L Howarth; Beate Sander Journal: Vaccine Date: 2004-03-12 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Francisco Asensi; Maribel De Jose; Manuel Lorente; Fernando Moraga; Vincent Ciuryla; Steve Arikian; Roman Casciano; Maximo Vento Journal: Value Health Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Steven B Black; Henry R Shinefield; Stella Ling; John Hansen; Bruce Fireman; David Spring; Jack Noyes; Edwin Lewis; Paula Ray; Janelle Lee; Jill Hackell Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: S M Bartsch; J A McKinnell; L E Mueller; L G Miller; S K Gohil; S S Huang; B Y Lee Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 8.067