Chun-Yi Lu1, Ching-Hu Chung2, Li-Min Huang1, Eliza Kruger3, Seng-Chuen Tan3, Xu-Hao Zhang4, Nan-Chang Chiu5,6. 1. National Taiwan University Children's Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan. 3. IQVIA Inc, Singapore, Singapore. 4. GSK, Singapore, Singapore. 5. Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan. ncc88@mmh.org.tw. 6. Mackay Children's Hospital, No. 92, Sec. 2, Zhongshan N. Rd, Taipei City, 10449, Taiwan. ncc88@mmh.org.tw.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) and non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) are substantial contributors to morbidity and mortality of diseases including invasive pneumococcal diseases (IPDs), pneumonia and acute otitis media (AOM) worldwide. In Taiwan, 10-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide and NTHi protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) are licensed in children against pneumococcal disease. In addition to S. pneumoniae, clinical trials suggest efficacy of PHiD-CV against NTHi AOM. This study aims at evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a 2 + 1 schedule of PHiD-CV vs. PCV13 2 + 1 in the universal mass vaccination program of infants in Taiwan. METHODS: A published Markov cohort model was adapted to simulate the epidemiological burden of IPD, pneumonia and AOM for a birth cohort in Taiwan over 10 years. The probability of entering a specific health state was based on the incidence rate of the diseases. Only direct medical costs were included, and costs and outcomes were discounted annually. Vaccine efficacy assumptions were based on published data and validated by a panel of independent experts. Clinical, epidemiological, and serotype distribution data were based on locally published data or the National Health Insurance Research Database. Price parity of vaccines was assumed. Published pneumococcal disease-related disutility weights were used due to lack of local data. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated and benchmarked against the recommended threshold in Taiwan. Extensive one-way sensitivity analysis, alternative scenarios and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: PHiD-CV would potentially reduce the number of NTHi-related AOM cases substantially and prevent comparable IPD and pneumonia-related cases and deaths compared to PCV13. Over a 10-year horizon, PHiD-CV is estimated to dominate PCV13, saving 6.7 million New Taiwan Dollars (NTD) and saving 21 quality-adjusted life years. The result was robust over a wide range of sensitivity analyses. The dominance of PHiD-CV was demonstrated in 90.5% of the simulations. CONCLUSIONS: PHiD-CV 2 + 1 would provide comparable prevention of IPD, pneumonia cases and additional reduction of NTHi-AOM cases, and is considered dominant compared with PCV13 2 + 1 in Taiwan.
BACKGROUND: Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) and non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) are substantial contributors to morbidity and mortality of diseases including invasive pneumococcal diseases (IPDs), pneumonia and acute otitis media (AOM) worldwide. In Taiwan, 10-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide and NTHi protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) are licensed in children against pneumococcal disease. In addition to S. pneumoniae, clinical trials suggest efficacy of PHiD-CV against NTHi AOM. This study aims at evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a 2 + 1 schedule of PHiD-CV vs. PCV13 2 + 1 in the universal mass vaccination program of infants in Taiwan. METHODS: A published Markov cohort model was adapted to simulate the epidemiological burden of IPD, pneumonia and AOM for a birth cohort in Taiwan over 10 years. The probability of entering a specific health state was based on the incidence rate of the diseases. Only direct medical costs were included, and costs and outcomes were discounted annually. Vaccine efficacy assumptions were based on published data and validated by a panel of independent experts. Clinical, epidemiological, and serotype distribution data were based on locally published data or the National Health Insurance Research Database. Price parity of vaccines was assumed. Published pneumococcal disease-related disutility weights were used due to lack of local data. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated and benchmarked against the recommended threshold in Taiwan. Extensive one-way sensitivity analysis, alternative scenarios and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: PHiD-CV would potentially reduce the number of NTHi-related AOM cases substantially and prevent comparable IPD and pneumonia-related cases and deaths compared to PCV13. Over a 10-year horizon, PHiD-CV is estimated to dominate PCV13, saving 6.7 million New Taiwan Dollars (NTD) and saving 21 quality-adjusted life years. The result was robust over a wide range of sensitivity analyses. The dominance of PHiD-CV was demonstrated in 90.5% of the simulations. CONCLUSIONS: PHiD-CV 2 + 1 would provide comparable prevention of IPD, pneumonia cases and additional reduction of NTHi-AOM cases, and is considered dominant compared with PCV13 2 + 1 in Taiwan.
Authors: Roman Prymula; Pascal Peeters; Viktor Chrobok; Pavla Kriz; Elena Novakova; Eva Kaliskova; Igor Kohl; Patricia Lommel; Jan Poolman; Jean-Paul Prieels; Lode Schuerman Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-03-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jukka Jokinen; Hanna Rinta-Kokko; Lotta Siira; Arto A Palmu; Mikko J Virtanen; Hanna Nohynek; Anni Virolainen-Julkunen; Maija Toropainen; J Pekka Nuorti Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Carla Magda Allan S Domingues; Jennifer R Verani; Ernesto Issac Montenegro Renoiner; Maria Cristina de Cunto Brandileone; Brendan Flannery; Lucia Helena de Oliveira; João Barberino Santos; José Cássio de Moraes Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Miguel W Tregnaghi; Xavier Sáez-Llorens; Pio López; Hector Abate; Enrique Smith; Adriana Pósleman; Arlene Calvo; Digna Wong; Carlos Cortes-Barbosa; Ana Ceballos; Marcelo Tregnaghi; Alexandra Sierra; Mirna Rodriguez; Marisol Troitiño; Carlos Carabajal; Andrea Falaschi; Ana Leandro; Maria Mercedes Castrejón; Alejandro Lepetic; Patricia Lommel; William P Hausdorff; Dorota Borys; Javier Ruiz Guiñazú; Eduardo Ortega-Barría; Juan P Yarzábal; Lode Schuerman Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 11.069