Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Ironing out the statistical wrinkles in "ten ironic rules".

Literature DB >> 23587691

Ironing out the statistical wrinkles in "ten ironic rules".

Martin A Lindquist¹, Brian Caffo², Ciprian Crainiceanu².

Abstract

The article "Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers" (Friston, 2012) shares some commonly heard frustrations about the peer-review process that all researchers can identify with. Though we found the article amusing, we have some concerns about its description of a number of statistical issues. In this commentary we address these issues, as well as the premise of the article.

Entities: CellLine Chemical Disease Gene Species

Mesh：

Year: 2013 PMID： 23587691 PMCID： PMC3730443 DOI： 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.056

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage ISSN： 1053-8119 Impact factor: 6.556

4 in total

Review 1. Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers.

Authors: Karl Friston
Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2. Everything you never wanted to know about circular analysis, but were afraid to ask.

Authors: Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Martin A Lindquist; Thomas E Nichols; Russell A Poldrack; Edward Vul
Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 6.200

3. Correlations and Multiple Comparisons in Functional Imaging: A Statistical Perspective (Commentary on Vul et al., 2009).

Authors: Martin A Lindquist; Andrew Gelman
Journal: Perspect Psychol Sci Date: 2009-05

4. Cooperation between referees and authors increases peer review accuracy.

Authors: Jeffrey T Leek; Margaret A Taub; Fernando J Pineda
Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 3.240

4 in total

21 in total

1. Confidence and precision increase with high statistical power.

Authors: Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal: Nat Rev Neurosci Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 34.870

2. Cross-validation and hypothesis testing in neuroimaging: An irenic comment on the exchange between Friston and Lindquist et al.

Authors: Philip T Reiss
Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 6.556

3. The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences.

Authors: Craig Hedge; Georgina Powell; Petroc Sumner
Journal: Behav Res Methods Date: 2018-06

Review 4. Neuroimaging of individual differences: A latent variable modeling perspective.

Authors: Shelly R Cooper; Joshua J Jackson; Deanna M Barch; Todd S Braver
Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2019-01-03 Impact factor: 8.989

5. Autosomal Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Disease: Analysis of genetic subgroups by Machine Learning.

Authors: Diego Castillo-Barnes; Li Su; Javier Ramírez; Diego Salas-Gonzalez; Francisco J Martinez-Murcia; Ignacio A Illan; Fermin Segovia; Andres Ortiz; Carlos Cruchaga; Martin R Farlow; Chengjie Xiong; Neil R Graff-Radford; Peter R Schofield; Colin L Masters; Stephen Salloway; Mathias Jucker; Hiroshi Mori; Johannes Levin; Juan M Gorriz
Journal: Inf Fusion Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 12.975

6. Multimodal predictive modeling of individual treatment outcome in cocaine dependence with combined neuroimaging and behavioral predictors.

Authors: Sean X Luo; Diana Martinez; Kenneth M Carpenter; Mark Slifstein; Edward V Nunes
Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 4.492

Review 7. Attempted and successful compensation in preclinical and early manifest neurodegeneration - a review of task FMRI studies.

Authors: Elisa Scheller; Lora Minkova; Mathias Leitner; Stefan Klöppel
Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2014-09-29 Impact factor: 4.157