STUDY OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritize future research needs (FRN) topics for diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: Twenty-one panel members represented six stake-holder categories: patients and the public, providers; purchasers of health care, payers, policymakers, and principal investigators. Building on a recently completed comparative effectiveness review, stakeholders nominated and discussed potential FRN topics. Stakeholders then nominated their top priority FRN topics based on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Effective Health Care Program Selection Criteria. From these nominations, the highest priority FRN topics were determined and were elaborated upon to include possible study designs to address the topics. RESULTS: Thirty-seven topics were discussed and prioritized. The nine highest priority FRN topics included: cost-effectiveness of management strategies, defining age- and sex-specific criteria for OSA, evaluating routine preoperative screening for OSA, evaluating involvement of a sleep medicine specialist in diagnosis of OSA, evaluating clinical prediction rules, assessing the effect of treating sleep disordered breathing and long-term clinical outcomes, comparing treatments for patients who do not tolerate positive airway pressure, evaluating strategies to improve treatment compliance, and evaluating the association between sleep apnea severity and long-term clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: While there are numerous specific research questions with low or insufficient strength of evidence for OSA management, OSA patients, their healthcare providers, and society at large would benefit from refocusing research efforts into the prioritized research questions and away from simple comparisons of short-term outcomes between specific interventions.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritize future research needs (FRN) topics for diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: Twenty-one panel members represented six stake-holder categories: patients and the public, providers; purchasers of health care, payers, policymakers, and principal investigators. Building on a recently completed comparative effectiveness review, stakeholders nominated and discussed potential FRN topics. Stakeholders then nominated their top priority FRN topics based on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Effective Health Care Program Selection Criteria. From these nominations, the highest priority FRN topics were determined and were elaborated upon to include possible study designs to address the topics. RESULTS: Thirty-seven topics were discussed and prioritized. The nine highest priority FRN topics included: cost-effectiveness of management strategies, defining age- and sex-specific criteria for OSA, evaluating routine preoperative screening for OSA, evaluating involvement of a sleep medicine specialist in diagnosis of OSA, evaluating clinical prediction rules, assessing the effect of treating sleep disordered breathing and long-term clinical outcomes, comparing treatments for patients who do not tolerate positive airway pressure, evaluating strategies to improve treatment compliance, and evaluating the association between sleep apnea severity and long-term clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: While there are numerous specific research questions with low or insufficient strength of evidence for OSA management, OSA patients, their healthcare providers, and society at large would benefit from refocusing research efforts into the prioritized research questions and away from simple comparisons of short-term outcomes between specific interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Obstructive sleep apnea; diagnosis; future research needs; study design; treatment
Authors: Patrick J Strollo; M Safwan Badr; Michael P Coppola; Samuel A Fleishman; Ofer Jacobowitz; Clete A Kushida Journal: Sleep Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Thomas W Concannon; Paul Meissner; Jo Anne Grunbaum; Newell McElwee; Jeanne-Marie Guise; John Santa; Patrick H Conway; Denise Daudelin; Elaine H Morrato; Laurel K Leslie Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Darren R Mansfield; N Claire Gollogly; David M Kaye; Meroula Richardson; Peter Bergin; Matthew T Naughton Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-11-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Peter T Hallowell; Thomas A Stellato; Marianna C Petrozzi; Margaret Schuster; Kristen Graf; Ann Robinson; John J Jasper Journal: Surgery Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Stanley Ip; Carolyn D'Ambrosio; Kamal Patel; Ndidiamaka Obadan; Georgios D Kitsios; Mei Chung; Ethan M Balk Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2012-03-08
Authors: Phyllis C Zee; M Safwan Badr; Clete Kushida; Janet M Mullington; Allan I Pack; Sairam Parthasarathy; Susan Redline; Ronald S Szymusiak; James K Walsh; Nathaniel F Watson Journal: Sleep Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Jennifer Corrigan; Imhokhai Ogah; Ada Ip-Buting; Heather Sharpe; Cheryl R Laratta; Peter Peller; Willis H Tsai; Sachin R Pendharkar Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2020-10-05
Authors: Matthew T V Chan; Chew-Yin Wang; Edwin Seet; Stanley Tam; Hou-Yee Lai; Stuart Walker; Timothy G Short; Richard Halliwell; Frances Chung Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 2.692