Literature DB >> 23585150

Microvascular anastomotic coupler assessment in head and neck reconstruction.

John W Frederick1, Larissa Sweeny, William R Carroll, Eben L Rosenthal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the advantages of using mechanical anastomotic systems in head and neck free tissue transfer. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series with chart review.
SETTING: A university-based tertiary care center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of mechanical venous coupler devices in head and neck reconstruction performed between October 2004 and December 2006. A total of 261 venous anastomoses were performed in 234 consecutive patients. Five types of flaps were performed: radial forearm (66%), anterior lateral thigh (12%), fibula (9%), rectus abdominis (8%), and latissimus dorsi (2%). Demographic data were collected, and the outcomes measured were flap survival and microvascular complications.
RESULTS: The size of the venous anastomosis ranged from 1.5 to 4.0 mm, with most being 3.0 mm (56%) followed by 3.5 mm (23%). The most common recipient vein used was a stump off the internal jugular vein (76%) followed by the external jugular vein (17%). Microvascular complications occurred in <5% (n = 11) of patients, with >50% of those being arterial insufficiency (n = 7). Total failures occurred in 3% (n = 7) of patients: 1.5% (n = 4) acute failures (<5 days) and 1.5% (n = 3) late failures. Of the acute failures, causes included venous congestion (n = 1) and arterial insufficiencies (n = 3). The venous coupler used in the failures was 3.0 mm in diameter. Free flap failures resulting from arterial insufficiency involved coupling to the external jugular vein, while the remaining free flap failures (n = 4) used the internal jugular vein.
CONCLUSION: With an early venous failure rate of 0.38%, mechanical anastomosis is an adequate alternative to hand-sewn techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  head and neck; mechanical anastomosis; microvascular; outcomes; reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23585150      PMCID: PMC3951332          DOI: 10.1177/0194599813486875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  19 in total

Review 1.  Microvascular free flaps: a major advance in head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  Alessandra Rinaldo; Ashok R Shaha; William I Wei; Carl E Silver; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  The UNILINK instrument system for fast and safe microvascular anastomosis.

Authors:  L T Ostrup; A Berggren
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  Clinical experience with the 3M microvascular coupling anastomotic device in 100 free-tissue transfers.

Authors:  C Y Ahn; W W Shaw; S Berns; B L Markowitz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Clinical experience in end-to-side venous anastomoses with a microvascular anastomotic coupling device in head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  M D DeLacure; M A Kuriakose; A L Spies
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-08

Review 5.  Complications of free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection.

Authors:  Eric M Genden; Alessandra Rinaldo; Carlos Suárez; William I Wei; Patrick J Bradley; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.337

6.  Free flap reconstruction in 1999 and 2009: changing case characteristics and outcomes.

Authors:  Kiran Kakarala; Kevin S Emerick; Derrick T Lin; James W Rocco; Daniel G Deschler
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Single versus dual venous drainage of the radial forearm free flap.

Authors:  N D Futran; B C Stack
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Do multiple venous anastomoses reduce risk of thrombosis in free-flap transfer? Efficacy of dual anastomoses of separate venous systems.

Authors:  Akihiro Ichinose; Hiroto Terashi; Minoru Nakahara; Isao Sugimoto; Kazunobu Hashikawa; Tadashi Nomura; Nobutaka Ogata; Satoshi Yokoo; Shinya Tahara
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  [The ring-pin anastomosis technique. Long-term clinical experiences with the mechanical ring-pin system for microvascular anastomoses in reconstructive head and neck surgery ].

Authors:  E Röpke; A Berghaus; M Bloching
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Clinical experience with a microvascular anastomotic device in head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  M D DeLacure; R S Wong; B L Markowitz; M R Kobayashi; C Y Ahn; D P Shedd; A L Spies; T R Loree; W W Shaw
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  3 in total

1.  Venous anastomosis in free flap reconstruction after radical neck dissection: is the external jugular vein a feasible option?

Authors:  Maximilian Reiter; Philipp Baumeister
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  3D-Printed Sugar-Based Stents Facilitating Vascular Anastomosis.

Authors:  Ali Farzin; Amir K Miri; Fatemeh Sharifi; Negar Faramarzi; Arian Jaberi; Azadeh Mostafavi; Ricky Solorzano; Yu Shrike Zhang; Nasim Annabi; Ali Khademhosseini; Ali Tamayol
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 9.933

3.  Venous Coupler in Pediatric Free Tissue Transfer: Case Series and Literature Review.

Authors:  Salah Aldekhayel; Feras Alshomer; Bushra Alhazmi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-02-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.