Literature DB >> 23583985

Methodology for the determination of normal background concentrations of contaminants in English soil.

E Louise Ander1, Christopher C Johnson, Mark R Cave, Barbara Palumbo-Roe, C Paul Nathanail, R Murray Lark.   

Abstract

The revised Environmental Protection Act Part 2A contaminated land Statutory Guidance (England and Wales) makes reference to 'normal' levels of contaminants in soil. The British Geological Survey has been commissioned by the United Kingdom Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) to estimate contaminant levels in soil and to define what is meant by 'normal' for English soil. The Guidance states that 'normal' levels of contaminants are typical and widespread and arise from a combination of both natural and diffuse pollution contributions. Available systematically collected soil data sets for England are explored for inorganic contaminants (As, Cd, Cu, Hg, Ni and Pb) and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP). Spatial variability of contaminants is studied in the context of the underlying parent material, metalliferous mineralisation and associated mining activities, and the built (urban) environment, the latter being indicative of human activities such as industry and transportation. The most significant areas of elevated contaminant concentrations are identified as contaminant domains. Therefore, rather than estimating a single national contaminant range of concentrations, we assign an upper threshold value to contaminant domains. Our representation of this threshold is a Normal Background Concentration (NBC) defined as the upper 95% confidence limit of the 95th percentile for the soil results associated with a particular domain. Concentrations of a contaminant are considered to be typical and widespread for the identified contaminant domain up to (and including) the calculated NBC. A robust statistical methodology for determining NBCs is presented using inspection of data distribution plots and skewness testing, followed by an appropriate data transformation in order to reduce the effects of point source contamination.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23583985     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of methods used to calculate typical threshold values for potentially toxic elements in soil.

Authors:  Rebekka McIlwaine; Siobhan F Cox; Rory Doherty; Sherry Palmer; Ulrich Ofterdinger; Jennifer M McKinley
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Measuring the solid-phase fractionation of lead in urban and rural soils using a combination of geochemical survey data and chemical extractions.

Authors:  Mark Cave; Joanna Wragg; Charles Gowing; Amanda Gardner
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Source and background threshold values of potentially toxic elements in soils by multivariate statistics and GIS-based mapping: a high density sampling survey in the Parauapebas basin, Brazilian Amazon.

Authors:  Prafulla Kumar Sahoo; Roberto Dall'Agnol; Gabriel Negreiros Salomão; Jair da Silva Ferreira Junior; Marcio Souza da Silva; Gabriel Caixeta Martins; Pedro Walfir Martin E Souza Filho; Mike A Powell; Clovis Wagner Maurity; Rômulo Simões Angelica; Marlene Furtado da Costa; José Oswaldo Siqueira
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Evaluation and Potential Uses of Site Investigation Soil Contamination Data Submitted to Uk Local Government.

Authors:  Emma E Hellawell; Susan J Hughes
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.644

Review 5.  Review of Heavy Metals Pollution in China in Agricultural and Urban Soils.

Authors:  Eshetu Shifaw
Journal:  J Health Pollut       Date:  2018-06-06

6.  Causes of variations of trace and rare earth elements concentration in lakes bottom sediments in the Bory Tucholskie National Park, Poland.

Authors:  Mariusz Sojka; Adam Choiński; Mariusz Ptak; Marcin Siepak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  A review of the impacts of degradation threats on soil properties in the UK.

Authors:  A S Gregory; K Ritz; S P McGrath; J N Quinton; K W T Goulding; R J A Jones; J A Harris; R Bol; P Wallace; E S Pilgrim; A P Whitmore
Journal:  Soil Use Manag       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.950

8.  Variability in the chemistry of private drinking water supplies and the impact of domestic treatment systems on water quality.

Authors:  E L Ander; M J Watts; P L Smedley; E M Hamilton; R Close; H Crabbe; T Fletcher; A Rimell; M Studden; G Leonardi
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.609

9.  Linkage of national soil quality measurements to primary care medical records in England and Wales: a new resource for investigating environmental impacts on human health.

Authors:  Jack E Gibson; E Louise Ander; Mark Cave; Fiona Bath-Hextall; Anwar Musah; Jo Leonardi-Bee
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2018-07-16

10.  Comprehensive Evaluation of Metal Pollution in Urban Soils of a Post-Industrial City-A Case of Łódź, Poland.

Authors:  Kinga Wieczorek; Anna Turek; Małgorzata Szczesio; Wojciech M Wolf
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.