| Literature DB >> 32971977 |
Kinga Wieczorek1, Anna Turek1, Małgorzata Szczesio1, Wojciech M Wolf1.
Abstract
The pollution of urban soils by metals is a global problem. Prolonged exposure of habitants who are in contact with metals retained in soil poses a health risk. This particularly applies to industrialized cities with developed transport networks. The aim of the study was to determine the content and spatial distribution of mobile metal fractions in soils of the city of Łódź and to identify their load and sources. Multivariate statistical analysis (principal component analysis (PCA), cluster analysis (CA)), combined with GIS, were used to make a comprehensive evaluation of the soil contamination. Hot-spots and differences between urban and suburban areas were also investigated. Metals were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) after soil extraction with 1 mol L-1 HCl. In most sites, the metal content changes in the following order: Zn > Pb > Cu > Ni > Cd. About one-third of the samples are considerably (or very highly) contaminated, (contamination factor, CF > 3) with Cu, Pb, or Zn. In almost 40% of the samples, contaminated soils were found (pollution load index, PLI > 1). All metals have a strong influence on the first principal component (PC1), whereas second principal component (PC2) is related to pH. Polluted soils are located in the downtown, in the south and east part of the city. The distribution of contamination coincides with the urban layout, low emission sources and former industrial areas of Łódź.Entities:
Keywords: GIS; hot-spots; metal pollution; multivariate analysis; urban soil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32971977 PMCID: PMC7570559 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25184350
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Location of the sampling sites in Łódź (Poland).
Figure 2Spatial distribution of (a) pH and mobile fractions of: (b) Zn; (c) Cd; (d) Ni; (e) Cu; (f) Pb in soil.
Summary of descriptive statistics for metal contents (mg kg−1) and pH in examined soil samples (n = 78).
| Header | Pb | Cd | Cu | Ni | Zn | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 21.6 | 0.34 | 8.39 | 2.10 | 42.8 | 6.0 |
| Minimum | 4.05 | 0.05 | 0.77 | 0.33 | 2.45 | 3.5 |
| Q1 | 10.4 | 0.15 | 3.10 | 0.90 | 9.58 | 5.0 |
| Median | 15.2 | 0.24 | 5.20 | 1.48 | 16.7 | 6.4 |
| Q3 | 23.6 | 0.42 | 11.6 | 2.96 | 60.9 | 7.0 |
| Maximum | 163 | 2.09 | 48.4 | 7.63 | 358 | 8.0 |
| Skewness | 4.39 | 3.13 | 2.45 | 1.43 | 2.89 | −0.59 |
| Kurtosis | 24.5 | 12.9 | 6.91 | 1.81 | 10.4 | −1.01 |
| K–S p | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.05 | <0.01 | <0.05 |
| CV [%] | 101 | 94.1 | 108 | 76.5 | 140 | 20.7 |
Q1—lower quartile; Q3—upper quartile; K–S—Kolmogorov–Smirnov; CV—coefficient of variation.
Figure 3Spatial distribution of (a) pollution load index (PLI); (b) first principal component (PC1); (c) second principal component (PC2).
Figure 4Loading plot of two main components PC1 and PC2.
Figure 5Score plot of PC1 versus PC2 for sampling points.
Figure 6Factor values obtained from principal component analysis (PCA) for sampling points and classified according to the cluster analysis (CA) results.
Metal contents (mg kg−1) and pH values for clusters and outliers.
| Pb | Cd | Cu | Ni | Zn | pH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster 1 | 20.0–52.3 | 0.36–0.74 | 6.13–33.4 | 2.43–4.83 | 47.3–208 | 5.2–7.2 |
| mean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cluster 2a | 10.4–27.4 | 0.19–0.49 | 4.09–18.4 | 1.06–5.92 | 12.0–91.6 | 6.0–7.4 |
| mean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cluster 2b | 6.53–22.7 | 0.11–0.28 | 1.14–7.62 | 0.53–2.00 | 3.84–21.2 | 6.1–7.6 |
| mean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cluster 2c | 4.05–16.8 | 0.08–0.25 | 0.77–3.97 | 0.43–1.42 | 3.07–20.3 | 5.0–6.0 |
| mean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cluster 2d | 7.89–24.9 | 0.05–0.24 | 1.09–8.11 | 0.33–3.60 | 2.45–23.1 | 3.5–4.6 |
| mean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site 52 | 163 | 1.29 | 41.8 | 6.52 | 204 | 5.2 |
| Site 4 | 103 | 2.09 | 16.4 | 6.26 | 358 | 8.0 |
| Site 49 | 34.4 | 1.01 | 16.3 | 6.09 | 105 | 7.3 |
| Site 44 | 20.4 | 1.32 | 12.6 | 7.63 | 183 | 7.6 |
| Site 2 | 48.6 | 0.76 | 48.4 | 3.89 | 65.2 | 4.3 |