Literature DB >> 23582504

Predictors of post-mastectomy reconstruction in an underserved population.

Erik M Wolfswinkel1, Santiago N Lopez, William M Weathers, Sahar Qashqai, Tao Wang, Susan G Hilsenbeck, Mothaffar F Rimawi, Lior Heller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Past studies found insurance status, race, comorbidities and hospital setting influence the likelihood and timing of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (BR). We evaluated these factors at a public hospital serving a predominantly minority and uninsured population.
METHODS: Women who underwent mastectomy and/or BR from 2005 to 2011 were reviewed. The association between patients' characteristics and receipt of BR and timing (immediate BR vs. delayed BR) were analyzed. The 5-year overall BR rate was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: The analysis included 387 patients. 130 received BR. 85 (65%) received immediate BR and 25 (19%) underwent microsurgical repair. The total complication rate was 25%. The 5 yr overall BR rate was 43% (95% CI: 36%-51%). Univariate factors positively associated with overall BR included younger age, non-smoker, lower BMI, no comorbidities, no neoadjuvant chemotherapy requirement, lower AJCC stage and negative lymph nodes. Younger age, no comorbidities, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, higher AJCC stage, and positive lymph nodes were positively associated with delayed breast reconstruction compared to immediate BR. Multivariate regression models show patient of younger age (p<0.001), BMI less than 30 (p<0.01), negative lymph nodes (p<0.03) and no neoadjuvant chemotherapy requirement (p<0.01) are more likely to have BR overall: young patients (p<0.02) are more likely to have delayed BR. Race and insurance type were not significantly associated with BR or timing of BR given the patient population.
CONCLUSION: At a public hospital, serving a largely uninsured population, post-mastectomy rates of immediate BR and overall BR within 5 yrs are 22% and 43%, respectively. Overall complication rates were low and a substantial fraction of post-mastectomy patients received microsurgical BR. Contrary to previous studies, race and insurance status were not found to be the primary drivers of post-mastectomy reconstruction.
Copyright © 2013 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23582504     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Health insurance coverage and racial disparities in breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Authors:  Tetyana P Shippee; Katy B Kozhimannil; Kathleen Rowan; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014 May-Jun

2.  Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Patterns at an Urban Academic Hospital and the Impact of Surgeon Gender.

Authors:  Genevieve Fasano; Solange Bayard; Rulla Tamimi; Anjile An; Michael E Zenilman; Melissa Davis; Lisa Newman; Vivian J Bea
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.339

3.  Rural-Urban Differences in Breast Reconstruction Utilization Following Oncologic Resection.

Authors:  Ryan C DeCoster; Robert-Marlo F Bautista; Jack C Burns; Adam J Dugan; R Wesley Edmunds; Brian D Rinker; J Matthew Webster; Henry C Vasconez
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Breast reconstruction after mastectomy at a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Shahnjayla K Connors; Melody S Goodman; Terence Myckatyn; Julie Margenthaler; Sarah Gehlert
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-02

Review 5.  Disparities in Use and Access to Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Among African American Women: A Targeted Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Sara E Soni; M Catherine Lee; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.