Literature DB >> 23581765

Application of protective stents in endovascular repair of acute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissections.

Jian Feng Liu1, Wei Liang Jiang, Hai Tao Lu, Yong Li Li, Tian Hua Zhang, Tatsuo Yamakawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the use of protective stents in the endovascular repair of acute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissections.
METHODS: From 2009 to 2011, 33 patients (27 men; mean age 47 years, range 31-73) with acute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) assisted by protective stents. In all cases, the proximal and distal landing zones differed in size by >5 mm, and the primary entry tear was in the proximal descending aorta. A bare self-expanding stent (protective stent) was deployed initially at the intended distal landing site of the primary stent-graft in the true lumen. The intention was that the bare stent would prevent excessive dilation of the distal end of the stent-graft in the vicinity of the entry tear, thus avoiding intimal rupture.
RESULTS: Successful stent deployment and sealing of the entry tear was achieved in all patients. The median diameter and length of the protective bare stents was 20.3 mm (range 18-24) and 72.7 mm (range 60-80), respectively, while the corresponding dimensions of the covered stent-grafts were 32.8 mm (range 26-40) and 157.4 mm (range 120-200 mm), respectively. There was no stent twisting, migration, of rupture of the false or true lumen. Computed tomography 1 week postoperatively demonstrated closure of the primary entry tear with thrombosis of the false lumen in all cases. No patients were lost to follow-up, which has ranged from 3 months to 3 years. No late endoleaks or stent complications, such as angulation, dislodgment, persistent leaks, branch obstruction, or stent-graft migration, have been observed, and there has been no chronic progressive true or false lumen dilatation, recurrences, or deaths.
CONCLUSION: Adjunctive use of a protective stent when treating acute Stanford type B aortic dissections in which the diameters of the proximal and distal landing zones differ by >5 mm is feasible and safe and provides good short-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23581765     DOI: 10.1583/1545-1550-20.2.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  4 in total

1.  Risk factors for distal stent graft-induced new entry following endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Qing Li; Long-Fei Wang; Wei-Guo Ma; Shang-Dong Xu; Jun Zheng; Xiao-Yan Xing; Lian-Jun Huang; Li-Zhong Sun
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Endovascular repair of acute complicated type B aortic dissection-systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term survival and reintervention.

Authors:  Ashley R Wilson-Smith; Benjamin Muston; Harish Kamalanathan; Amanda Yung; Cheng-Hao Jacky Chen; Prachi Sahai; Aditya Eranki
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-11

3.  Midterm prognosis of type B aortic dissection with and without dissecting aneurysm of descending thoracic aorta after endovascular repair.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Jichun Zhao; Yukui Ma; Bin Huang; Ding Yuan; Yi Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection with the restrictive bare stent technique: morphologic changes, technique details, and outcomes.

Authors:  Binshan Zha; Geliang Xu; Huagang Zhu; Wentao Xie; Zhigong Zhang; Yongsheng Li; Peng Qiu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.423

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.