Literature DB >> 23581121

Biology teachers' attitudes to dissection and alternatives.

Lesley A King1, Cheryl L Ross, Martin L Stephens, Andrew N Rowan.   

Abstract

A survey of 5000 American middle and high school level biology teachers was completed to assess attitudes and classroom practice relating to dissection and alternative teaching methods. A preliminary sample of 494 respondents revealed that 79% of teachers used dissection to teach biology. While 72% believed that dissection was an important part of the curriculum, 17% disagreed; 69% considered dissection to be an essential hands-on activity. While 31% believed that alternatives were as good as dissection for teaching anatomy and physiology, 55% disagreed. The primary reason given for continuing dissection, rather than exclusively using alternatives, was the hands-on aspect of dissection (69%). While the majority (66%) of biology teachers favoured student choice between dissection and other learning methods, 20% disagreed. Although the effectiveness of alternative methods has been documented, and ethical arguments against dissection have been advanced, the mainstream introduction of humane alternatives to dissection requires a transformation of the beliefs, experience and practice of biology teachers.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 23581121     DOI: 10.1177/026119290403201s76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Altern Lab Anim        ISSN: 0261-1929            Impact factor:   1.303


  2 in total

1.  Anatomical self-efficacy of undergraduate students improves during a fully online biology course with at-home dissections.

Authors:  Jacob P Youngblood; Emily A Webb; Logan E Gin; Peter van Leusen; Joanna R Henry; John M VandenBrooks; Sara E Brownell
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Influence of a Dissection Video Clip on Anxiety, Affect, and Self-Efficacy in Educational Dissection: A Treatment Study.

Authors:  Christoph Randler; Eda Demirhan; Peter Wüst-Ackermann; Inga H Desch
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.325

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.