OBJECTIVE: Despite evidence indicating therapeutic benefit for adhering to a prescribed regimen, many patients do not take their medications as prescribed. Non-adherence often leads to morbidity and to higher health care costs. The objective of the study was to assess patient characteristics associated with medication adherence across eight diseases. DESIGN: Retrospective data from a repository within an integrated health system was used to identify patients ≥18 years of age with ICD-9-CM codes for primary or secondary diagnoses for any of eight conditions (depression, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multiple sclerosis, cancer, or osteoporosis). Electronic pharmacy data was then obtained for 128 medications used for treatment. METHODS: Medication possession ratios (MPR) were calculated for those with one condition and one drug (n=15,334) and then for the total population having any of the eight diseases (n=31,636). The proportion of patients adherent (MPR ≥80%) was summarized by patient and living-area (census) characteristics. Bivariate associations between drug adherence and patient characteristics (age, sex, race, education, and comorbidity) were tested using contingency tables and chi-square tests. Logistic regression analysis examined predictors of adherence from patient and living area characteristics. RESULTS: Medication adherence for those with one condition was higher in males, Caucasians, older patients, and those living in areas with higher education rates and higher income. In the total population, adherence increased with lower comorbidity and increased number of medications. Substantial variation in adherence was found by condition with the lowest adherence for diabetes (51%) and asthma (33%). CONCLUSIONS: The expectation of high adherence due to a covered pharmacy benefit, and to enhanced medication access did not hold. Differences in medication adherence were found across condition and by patient characteristics. Great room for improvement remains, specifically for diabetes and asthma.
OBJECTIVE: Despite evidence indicating therapeutic benefit for adhering to a prescribed regimen, many patients do not take their medications as prescribed. Non-adherence often leads to morbidity and to higher health care costs. The objective of the study was to assess patient characteristics associated with medication adherence across eight diseases. DESIGN: Retrospective data from a repository within an integrated health system was used to identify patients ≥18 years of age with ICD-9-CM codes for primary or secondary diagnoses for any of eight conditions (depression, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multiple sclerosis, cancer, or osteoporosis). Electronic pharmacy data was then obtained for 128 medications used for treatment. METHODS: Medication possession ratios (MPR) were calculated for those with one condition and one drug (n=15,334) and then for the total population having any of the eight diseases (n=31,636). The proportion of patients adherent (MPR ≥80%) was summarized by patient and living-area (census) characteristics. Bivariate associations between drug adherence and patient characteristics (age, sex, race, education, and comorbidity) were tested using contingency tables and chi-square tests. Logistic regression analysis examined predictors of adherence from patient and living area characteristics. RESULTS: Medication adherence for those with one condition was higher in males, Caucasians, older patients, and those living in areas with higher education rates and higher income. In the total population, adherence increased with lower comorbidity and increased number of medications. Substantial variation in adherence was found by condition with the lowest adherence for diabetes (51%) and asthma (33%). CONCLUSIONS: The expectation of high adherence due to a covered pharmacy benefit, and to enhanced medication access did not hold. Differences in medication adherence were found across condition and by patient characteristics. Great room for improvement remains, specifically for diabetes and asthma.
Authors: Michael D Murray; James M Young; Daniel G Morrow; Michael Weiner; Wanzhu Tu; Shawn C Hoke; Daniel O Clark; Kevin T Stroupe; Jingwei Wu; Melissa M Deer; Tina E Bruner-England; Kevin M Sowinski; Faye E Smith; Neil B Oldridge; Irmina Gradus-Pizlo; Laura L Murray; D Craig Brater; Morris Weinberger Journal: Am J Geriatr Pharmacother Date: 2004-03
Authors: Yi Yang; Vennela Thumula; Patrick F Pace; Benjamin F Banahan; Noel E Wilkin; William B Lobb Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.393
Authors: Dong Wook Shin; Jong Hyock Park; Jae Hyun Park; Eun Cheol Park; So Young Kim; Sung Gyeong Kim; Jin Young Choi Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: John F Steiner; P Michael Ho; Brenda L Beaty; L Miriam Dickinson; Rebecca Hanratty; Chan Zeng; Heather M Tavel; Edward P Havranek; Arthur J Davidson; David J Magid; Raymond O Estacio Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2009-08-11
Authors: Marjolein M J Zanders; Harm R Haak; Myrthe P P van Herk-Sukel; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Jeffrey A Johnson Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2015-02-01 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Juan C Celedón; Esteban G Burchard; Dean Schraufnagel; Carlos Castillo-Salgado; Marc Schenker; John Balmes; Enid Neptune; Kristin J Cummings; Fernando Holguin; Kristin A Riekert; Juan P Wisnivesky; Joe G N Garcia; Jesse Roman; Rick Kittles; Victor E Ortega; Susan Redline; Rasika Mathias; Al Thomas; Jonathan Samet; Jean G Ford Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2017-05
Authors: Sunil Kripalani; Kathryn Goggins; Sam Nwosu; Jonathan Schildcrout; Amanda S Mixon; Candace McNaughton; Amanda M McDougald Scott; Kenneth A Wallston Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2015
Authors: Nicolas A Bamat; Osayame A Ekhaguere; Lingqiao Zhang; Dustin D Flannery; Sara C Handley; Heidi M Herrick; Susan S Ellenberg Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 2.486