Literature DB >> 23579503

A systematic review on low-cost box models to achieve basic and advanced laparoscopic skills during modern surgical training.

Gianpiero Gravante1, Dario Venditti.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Low-cost box models (BMs) are a valuable tool alternative to virtual-reality simulators. We aim to provide surgical trainees with a description of most common BMs and to present their validity to achieve basic and advanced laparoscopic skills.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was undertaken for all studies focusing on BMs, excluded were those presenting data on virtual-reality simulators only. Databases were screened up to December 2011.
RESULTS: Numerous studies focused on various BMs to improve generic tasks (ie, instrument navigation, coordination, and cutting). Only fewer articles described models specific for peculiar operations. All studies showed a significant improvement of basic laparoscopic skills after training with BMs. Furthermore, their low costs make them easily available to most surgical trainees.
CONCLUSIONS: BMs should be developed by all surgical trainees during their training. Fields for future improvement regard endoscopy and complex laparoscopic operations for which ad hoc BMs are not available.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23579503     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182827c29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  7 in total

1.  Development of a surgical training model for bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Hyeong Won Yu; Jin Wook Yi; Chan Yong Seong; Jong-Kyu Kim; In Eui Bae; Hyungju Kwon; Young Jun Chai; Su-Jin Kim; June Young Choi; Kyu Eun Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Low-cost simulation models in Urology: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Theo Pelly; Nimlan Shanmugathas; Henry Bowyer; Anuj Wali; Rahul Pankhania
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-07-08

3.  A laparoscopic simulator - maybe it is worth making it yourself.

Authors:  Dominik A Walczak; Piotr Piotrowski; Adam Jędrzejczyk; Dariusz Pawełczak; Zbigniew Pasieka
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 1.195

4.  Arthroscopic skills assessment and use of box model for training in arthroscopic surgery using Sawbones - "FAST" workstation.

Authors:  Saumitra Goyal; Mohamed Abdel Radi; Islam Karam-Allah Ramadan; Hatem Galal Said
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2016-11-01

5.  Can narration and guidance in video-enhanced learning improve performance on E-BLUS exercises?

Authors:  Sara Anacleto; Paulo Mota; Vitor Fernandes; Nuno Carvalho; Nuno Morais; Pedro Passos; Ricardo Rodrigues; Andreia Cardoso; Catarina Tinoco; Emanuel Dias; Estevão Lima; Jorge Correia-Pinto
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-03-03

Review 6.  Training residents in minimally invasive surgery; confirming competence or hoping for the best?

Authors:  Boel A Fransson
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.618

7.  Effect of visual feedback during laparoscopic basic training using a box trainer with a transparent top.

Authors:  Kosei Maemura; Yuko Mataki; Hiroshi Kurahara; Yota Kawasaki; Shinichirou Mori; Satoshi Iino; Masahiko Sakoda; Shinichi Ueno; Hiroyuki Shinchi; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2017-06-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.