| Literature DB >> 23578098 |
Ana Lucía Cadena-González1, Marten Sørensen, Ida Theilade.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medicinal plant species contribute significantly to folk medicine in Colombia. However, few local studies have investigated whether species used are introduced or native and whether there is a difference in importance of native and introduced medicinal plant species. The aim of the present study was to describe the use of medicinal plants within two municipalities, Campo Hermoso and Zetaquira, both in the department of Boyacá, Colombia and to assess the importance of native and introduced plants to healers, amateur healers and local people. As local healers including amateur healers have no history of introduced species our working hypotheses (H(1-2)) were that H(1): native and introduced medicinal plant species are of equal importance and H(2): healers and amateur healers do not differentiate in their preferences between native and introduced medicinal plant species.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23578098 PMCID: PMC3641003 DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-9-23
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed ISSN: 1746-4269 Impact factor: 2.733
Figure 1Main map showing locations of the municipalities of Campo Hermoso and Zetaquira in department of Boyacá. Inset map: outlines of the municipalities and villages visited in the rural areas. The scale is uniform within the inset map; for true relative positions of the municipalities see main map.
Distribution of informants who answered semi-structured interviews in the municipalities of Campo Hermoso and Zetaquira, including totals, percentage of interviewees native to the municipality, and age classes
| | | | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Campo Hermoso | 16 | 81 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Zetaquira | 25 | 80 | 6 | 11 | 8 |
Plant species reported as disappeared or endangered within the municipalities of Campo Hermoso and Zetaquira
| Disappeared species | ||
| ‘Alma negra’ | ||
| | ||
| ‘Gualola’ | | |
| ‘Mano de León’ | | |
| ‘Bejuco de roca’ | | |
| Endangered Species | ||
| | ||
Figure 2Life form and habitats of medicinal plant species reported in Campo Hermoso and Zetaquira. Gregarious herbs in home gardens refers to cultivated plants; Home gardens include also solares; Short-lived herbs and other herbs in pots are also cultivated; singular instances refers to: a wild twining plant along riverbanks, a succulent tall herb on farmland, a wild vine at shady and moist edges of secondary forests, a succulent plant in pots, a tree cultivated in garden.
Figure 3Number of plants used in Campo Hermoso and Zetaquira by categories of diseases.
Figure 4Total numbers of uses of plant parts or combinations of plant parts reported in Campo Hermoso and Zetaquira.
Figure 5Number of ways of preparation reported for medicinal plants in Campo Hermoso, Zetaquira or in both municipalities.
Figure 6Ways of administration reported in Campo Hermoso, Zetaquira or in both municipalities.
Most commonly treated categories of diseases with the most popular plant species used for their treatments
| Digestive system | 35 | |
| Infections from bacteria, parasites or fungi | 16 | |
| Muskuloskeletal system | 13 | |
| Nervous system | 10 | |
| Immune system | 9 | |
Plant species according to the highest actual index use values obtained in both municipalities
| 1 | 1.04 | 0.94 | 1.10 | 1.20 | 0.94 | stomach ache(B), headaches(B), intestinal inflammations(B), intestinal parasites(Z), fevers(Z), menstrual cramps(Z), diaper rash(Z) | |
| 0.85 | 1.08 | 0.50 | 1.05 | 1.24 | 0.75 | against cramps in uterus and menstrual pains(B), rheumatism(Z), intestinal parasites(C), cardio-regulator(Z) | |
| 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.75 | gripe(B),fevers(B),relaxant(B),stomach ache(B), intestine complaints(B) | |
| 0.6 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.63 | asthma (B), cough(B), fever(B), headache(B), healing wounds and skin spots(B), external inflammations(B), hair treatment(B), stomach cancer(Z) | |
| 0.4 | 0.81 | 0.98 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 1.13 | gripe(B), rheumatism(B), children bladder complaints(B), menstrual cramps(Z), colds and spams in muscles(C), stomach ache(C), intestinal complaints(C), against flies(Z) | |
| 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.75 | stomach complaints(B), diarrhoea(B), tiredness and weakness(C)/(Z), childbirth(Z) | |
| 0.6 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.44 | stomach aches(B), intestine complaints(Z), gripe(Z), prostate complaints(C), fevers(C) | |
| 0.4 | 0.63 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.88 | fevers(B), gripe(B), rheumatism(Z)/ (C), tiredness and weakness(C) | |
| 0.32 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 1.13 | rheumatism(B), allergies(B), blood cleaner and tonic (B), anti-haemorrhagic(B), skin infection and inflammations(C), gripe(C), mouth dryness(C) | |
| 0.2 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 1.00 | gripe(B), fevers(B), infections in throat(B), stomach and intestine complaints(B), rheumatism(C), eczema (C), headache(C), to prevent high blood pressure(Z) | |
| 0.12 | 0.69 | 0.49 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.94 | Intestinal complaints(B), Kidney complaints(Z), rheumatism(C), gripe(C), fevers(C), dengue(C), skin infections(C), circulatory complaints(C), mouth dryness(C) | |
| 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.38 | stomach-complaints(B),relaxant(B), rheumatism(Z),colds, spams and cramps in muscles (C) | |
| 0.44 | 0.19 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.31 | lungs complaints(B), tooth ache(B), hypertension complaints(B), against hair loss(B), muscles pain (C) rheumatism(C), stomach ache(Z), tiredness(Z) | |
| 0.36 | 0.25 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.50 | cardiovascular complaints as high blood pressure(B), enhance stomach function(B), halitosis(B), condiment herb(B), kidney complaints(C), intestinal pain(C), against menstrual pain(Z) | |
| 0.36 | 0.13 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.25 | stomach and intestinal complaints(B), relaxant(B), general indisposition(Z) | |
| 0.2 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.50 | gripe(B), stomach ache(B), inflammations of intestine(B) | |
| 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.56 | gripe(B), eye inflammations and infections(B), fevers(B), tiredness and weakness(Z), respiratory, complaints(B), head ache(Z), against hair lice(C) | |
| 0 | 0.63 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 0.69 | typhoid(C), dengue(C), fever(C), intestinal complaints(C) | |
| 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.49 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.31 | external-internal inflammations(B), gastritis(C), skin infections (Z), menstrual cramps(Z) | |
| 0.16 | 0.31 | 0.41 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.63 | intestinal complaints(B), eye dust (B), gripe(Z) | |
| 0.12 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.44 | stomach complaints(B), intestinal parasites(B) | |
| 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.25 | gripe(B), stomach ache(B), inflammations because infections(C), headache(Z), fevers(Z), rheumatism(Z) | |
| 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.25 | intestinal obstipation(B), stomach ache(B), condiment herb(B), relaxant(B), to regulate menstruation(Z) | |
| 0.16 | 0.31 | 0.51 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.81 | eye dust and infections(B), gastritis(B), liver cleanser(B), kidney complaints(C), fever(C), eczema(C), healing wounds(Z) | |
| 0.2 | 0.25 | 0.39 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.69 | relaxant(B), headache(C), mouth infections(B), rheumatism(B), body dryness(Z) |
Includes also estimated index use values.
*Introduced plant species; ˚No specimen collected; (C) Campo Hermoso; (Z) Zetaquira; aIUV Actual Index Use Value; eIUV Estimated Index Use Value; all-aIUV/eIUV Sum of all values corresponding to actual or estimated uses.
Results of Mann–Whitney-Wilcoxon tests of differences in Index Use Values (IUV) among native and introduced medicinal plants
| | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual IUV | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.677 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.005 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.095 |
| Estimated IUV | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.750 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.047 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.237 |
Med. = Median; Nat. = Native; Int. = Introduced.
Numbers of introduced and native medicinal plant species for which estimated and actual index use values could be calculated
| Introduced | Actual | 4 | 10 | 25 |
| | Estimated | 2 | 3 | 38 |
| Native | Actual | 11 | 5 | 18 |
| Estimated | 7 | 2 | 26 |
Jaccard-index similarity (%) between Campo Hermoso and Zetaquira municipalities for medicinal plant species with estimated and actual index use values
| Estimated | 88 | 74 |
| Actual | 64 | 53 |
Family Use Values (FUV) of most popular plant families calculated from estimated and actual index use values of species and number of native and introduced species per family
| 4 | 6 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | |
| 2 | 5 | 0.48 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.40 | |
| 1 | 3 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.17 | |
| 0 | 4 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.41 | |
| 4 | 0 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.37 | |
| 0 | 3 | 0.29 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.07 | |
| 1 | 2 | 0.29 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.07 | |
| 2 | 1 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 0.33 | 0.23 | 0.13 | 0.17 | |
| Acanthaceae | 2 | 0 | 0.13 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
| Alliaceae | 0 | 2 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
| Amaranthaceae | 1 | 1 | 0.44 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.14 | 0.21 |
| Bignoniaceae | 2 | 0 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 0.26 | 0.38 | 0.06 | 0.18 |
| Commelinaceae | 1 | 1 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Myrtaceae | 1 | 1 | 0.44 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.12 |
| Phytolaccaceae | 2 | 0 | 0.31 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.10 |
| Piperaceae | 2 | 0 | 0.47 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.12 |
| 0 | 1 | 0.56 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.24 | |
| 0 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.02 | |
| 0 | 1 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.61 | |
| 0 | 1 | 0.81 | 0.32 | 0.51 | 0.31 | 0.16 | 0.22 | |
| 0 | 1 | 0.44 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.60 | 0.56 |
Bold = plant families with higher number of species (>2); italics = plant families with two plant species; underlined = plant families with one species but high FUV. Est. = estimated; act. = actual; CH = Campo Hermoso; Zq = Zetaquira; both = both municipalities together.
Most popular species among healers and amateur healers