Literature DB >> 23576701

BDNF Val66Met polymorphism alters spinal DC stimulation-induced plasticity in humans.

Jean-Charles Lamy1, Maxwell Boakye.   

Abstract

The brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) is one of many genes thought to influence neuronal survival, synaptic plasticity, and neurogenesis. A common single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the BDNF gene due to valine-to-methionine substitution at codon 66 (BDNF Val66Met) in the normal population has been associated with complex neuronal phenotype, including differences in brain morphology, episodic memory, or cortical plasticity following brain stimulation and is believed to influence synaptic changes following motor learning task. However, the effect of this polymorphism on spinal plasticity remains largely unknown. Here, we used anodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS), a novel noninvasive technique that induces plasticity of spinal neuronal circuits in healthy subjects. To investigate whether the susceptibility of tsDCS probes of spinal plasticity is significantly influenced by BDNF polymorphism, we collected stimulus-response curves of the soleus (Sol) H reflex before, during, at current offset, and 15 min after anodal tsDCS delivered at Th11 (2.5 mA, 15 min, 0.071 mA/cm(2), and 64 mC/cm(2)) in 17 healthy, Met allele carriers and 17 Val homozygotes who were matched for age and sex. Anodal tsDCS induced a progressive leftward shift of recruitment curve of the H reflex during the stimulation that persisted for at least 15 min after current offset in Val/Val individuals. In contrast, this shift was not observed in Met allele carriers. Our findings demonstrate for the first time that the BDNF Val66Met genotype impacts spinal plasticity in humans, as assessed by tsDCS, and may be one factor influencing the natural response of the spinal cord to injury or disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BDNF Val66Met; H reflex; humans; spinal DC

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23576701     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00116.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  19 in total

1.  Astrocytes Protect against Isoflurane Neurotoxicity by Buffering pro-brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor.

Authors:  Creed M Stary; Xiaoyun Sun; Rona G Giffard
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Effects of cathodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation on mouse spinal network and complex multijoint movements.

Authors:  Zaghloul Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Pathways Mediating Activity-Induced Enhancement of Recovery From Peripheral Nerve Injury.

Authors:  Manning J Sabatier; Arthur W English
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 6.230

4.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation modulates human corticospinal system excitability.

Authors:  Tommaso Bocci; Sara Marceglia; Maurizio Vergari; Valeria Cognetto; Filippo Cogiamanian; Ferdinando Sartucci; Alberto Priori
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Repeated cathodal transspinal pulse and direct current stimulation modulate cortical and corticospinal excitability differently in healthy humans.

Authors:  Lynda M Murray; Maria Knikou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation and transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation as innovative tools for neuroscientists.

Authors:  Alberto Priori; Matteo Ciocca; Marta Parazzini; Maurizio Vergari; Roberta Ferrucci
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  High-Intensity Locomotor Exercise Increases Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Kristan A Leech; T George Hornby
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Acute intermittent hypoxia as a potential adjuvant to improve walking following spinal cord injury: evidence, challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Andrew Quesada Tan; Stella Barth; Randy D Trumbower
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2020-06-24

Review 9.  Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence from in vitro and in vivo models.

Authors:  Simon J Pelletier; Francesca Cicchetti
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.176

10.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Cortical Neuronal Activity in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Sara Marceglia; Simona Mrakic-Sposta; Manuela Rosa; Roberta Ferrucci; Francesca Mameli; Maurizio Vergari; Mattia Arlotti; Fabiana Ruggiero; Elio Scarpini; Daniela Galimberti; Sergio Barbieri; Alberto Priori
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.