Literature DB >> 18757085

Effects of the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients intolerant to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a randomised controlled trial.

S Yusuf, K Teo, C Anderson, J Pogue, L Dyal, I Copland, H Schumacher, G Dagenais, P Sleight.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce major cardiovascular events, but are not tolerated by about 20% of patients. We therefore assessed whether the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan would be effective in patients intolerant to ACE inhibitors with cardiovascular disease or diabetes with end-organ damage.
METHODS: After a 3-week run-in period, 5926 patients, many of whom were receiving concomitant proven therapies, were randomised to receive telmisartan 80 mg/day (n=2954) or placebo (n=2972) by use of a central automated randomisation system. Randomisation was stratified by hospital. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalisation for heart failure. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00153101.
FINDINGS: The median duration of follow-up was 56 (IQR 51-64) months. All randomised patients were included in the efficacy analyses. Mean blood pressure was lower in the telmisartan group than in the placebo group throughout the study (weighted mean difference between groups 4.0/2.2 [SD 19.6/12.0] mm Hg). 465 (15.7%) patients experienced the primary outcome in the telmisartan group compared with 504 (17.0%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.81-1.05, p=0.216). One of the secondary outcomes-a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke-occurred in 384 (13.0%) patients on telmisartan compared with 440 (14.8%) on placebo (0.87, 0.76-1.00, p=0.048 unadjusted; p=0.068 after adjustment for multiplicity of comparisons and overlap with primary outcome). 894 (30.3%) patients receiving telmisartan were hospitalised for a cardiovascular reason, compared with 980 (33.0%) on placebo (relative risk 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99; p=0.025). Fewer patients permanently discontinued study medication in the telmisartan group than in the placebo group (639 [21.6%] vs 705 [23.8%]; p=0.055); the most common reason for permanent discontinuation was hypotensive symptoms (29 [0.98%] in the telmisartan group vs 16 [0.54%] in the placebo group).
INTERPRETATION: Telmisartan was well tolerated in patients unable to tolerate ACE inhibitors. Although the drug had no significant effect on the primary outcome of this study, which included hospitalisations for heart failure, it modestly reduced the risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757085     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61242-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  245 in total

Review 1.  Is blood pressure reduction a valid surrogate endpoint for stroke prevention? An analysis incorporating a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, a by-trial weighted errors-in-variables regression, the surrogate threshold effect (STE) and the Biomarker-Surrogacy (BioSurrogate) Evaluation Schema (BSES).

Authors:  Marissa N Lassere; Kent R Johnson; Michal Schiff; David Rees
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 2.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Newer is not always better: all antihypertensive medications do not equally reduce cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Gerald W Smetana
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Angiotensin receptor blockers and tumorigenesis: something to be (or not to be) concerned about?

Authors:  Vadim Tchaikovski; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  Angiotensin-receptor blockade and risk of cancer: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Ilke Sipahi; Sara M Debanne; Douglas Y Rowland; Daniel I Simon; James C Fang
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  Are there benefits of antihypertensive therapy beyond blood pressure lowering?

Authors:  Joseph L Izzo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 8.  Direct renin inhibition: from pharmacological innovation to novel therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Massimo Volpe; Roberto Pontremoli; Claudio Borghi
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2011-09-01

9.  Blood Pressure Levels at the Time of Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization and Risk of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis.

Authors:  Giuliano Tocci; Emanuele Barbato; Roberta Coluccia; Anna Modestino; Beniamino Pagliaro; Vittoria Mastromarino; Francesca Giovannelli; Andrea Berni; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.689

10.  Effects of anti-hypertensive treatment on major cardiovascular events in populations within prehypertensive levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhongqiu Hong; Tao Wu; Shuxian Zhou; Boshui Huang; Jingfeng Wang; Dongmei Jin; Dengfeng Geng
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.