| Literature DB >> 23574744 |
Sarah R Carrino-Kyker1, Kurt A Smemo, David J Burke.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23574744 PMCID: PMC3629998 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-78
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Environmental gene tag (EGT) matches to lower levels in the SEED database that were significantly different with Fisher exact tests
| | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatty acids, lipids, and isoprenoids | Phospholipids | Glycerolipid and Glycerophospholipid Metabolism in Bacteria | Aldehyde dehydrogenase | 0.85 | 0 |
| Fatty acids, lipids, and isoprenoids | Isoprenoids | | | 1.04 | 0.49 |
| Iron acquisition and metabolism | Iron acquisition in | - | TonB-dependent receptor | 0 | 0.75 |
| Stress response | Oxidative Stress | Oxidative stress | Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase subunit C-like protein | 1.22 | 0.17 |
| RNA metabolism | RNA processing and modification | | | 1.66 | 2.70 |
| Carbohydrates | CO2 fixation | Calvin-Benson cycle | NAD-dependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | 1.55 | 0.25 |
| Carbohydrates | Fermentation | Acetyl-CoA fermentation to Butyrate | | 1.88 | 1.24 |
| Protein metabolism | Protein processing and modification | G3E family of P-loop GTPases (metallocenter biosynthesis) | Urease beta subunit | 0 | 0.82 |
1 The lowest significant level for each category is reported here. Only the subsystem categories that were significantly different with Fisher exact tests (see Figure 2) are reported here. See Additional file 1: Tables S1-S3 for complete results of Fisher exact tests.
Figure 2Significant subsystem differences between the +NO Results of a Fisher exact test (conducted with the Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles program) showing the significant differences of subsystem environmental gene tag (EGT) matches between treatments. Higher EGT relative abundance in the +NO3- metagenome have a positive difference between proportions (closed circles), while higher EGT relative abundance in the –N metagenome have a negative difference between proportions (open circles).
Figure 1Subsystem matches in the nitrogen metabolism category. The proportional numbers of environmental gene tags that matched with level 2 sequences within the nitrogen metabolism subsystem category for the +NO3- (solid bars) and –N (open bars) metagenomes. No significant differences were found when these sequences were analyzed with Fisher exact tests in the Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles program.
Nitrogen metabolism gene matches and the number of sequences from the +NO3- metagenome that matched with the genes, as determined with a BLASTN comparison
| +NO3- seq. 1 | 3 | 92.83 | 65 | 7.33E-18 | |
| +NO3- seq. 2 | 125 | 83.83 | 131.29 | 9.86E-08 | |
| 1 | 82.35 | 119 | 4.00E-11 |
1The query sequence indicates that only two sequences out of 28,688 in the +NO3- metagenome matched with sequences in the N metabolism database. Seq. 1 matched with three database entries, while seq. 2 matched with 126 database entries.
Figure 3Significant phylum differences between the +NO Results of a Fisher exact test (conducted with the Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles program) showing the significant differences of environmental gene tag (EGT) matches to phyla between treatments. Higher EGT relative abundance in the +NO3- metagenome have a positive difference between proportions (closed circles), while higher EGT relative abundance in the –N metagenome have a negative difference between proportions (open circles).
Figure 4Significant class differences in the domain bacteria between the +NO Results of a Fisher exact test (conducted with the Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles program) showing the significant differences of environmental gene tag (EGT) matches to class between treatments. Higher EGT relative abundance in the +NO3- metagenome have a positive difference between proportions (closed circles), while higher EGT relative abundance in the –N metagenome have a negative difference between proportions (open circles).