Literature DB >> 23574741

Intra-day signal instabilities affect decoding performance in an intracortical neural interface system.

János A Perge1, Mark L Homer, Wasim Q Malik, Sydney Cash, Emad Eskandar, Gerhard Friehs, John P Donoghue, Leigh R Hochberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Motor neural interface systems (NIS) aim to convert neural signals into motor prosthetic or assistive device control, allowing people with paralysis to regain movement or control over their immediate environment. Effector or prosthetic control can degrade if the relationship between recorded neural signals and intended motor behavior changes. Therefore, characterizing both biological and technological sources of signal variability is important for a reliable NIS. APPROACH: To address the frequency and causes of neural signal variability in a spike-based NIS, we analyzed within-day fluctuations in spiking activity and action potential amplitude recorded with silicon microelectrode arrays implanted in the motor cortex of three people with tetraplegia (BrainGate pilot clinical trial, IDE). MAIN
RESULTS: 84% of the recorded units showed a statistically significant change in apparent firing rate (3.8 ± 8.71 Hz or 49% of the mean rate) across several-minute epochs of tasks performed on a single session, and 74% of the units showed a significant change in spike amplitude (3.7 ± 6.5 µV or 5.5% of mean spike amplitude). 40% of the recording sessions showed a significant correlation in the occurrence of amplitude changes across electrodes, suggesting array micro-movement. Despite the relatively frequent amplitude changes, only 15% of the observed within-day rate changes originated from recording artifacts such as spike amplitude change or electrical noise, while 85% of the rate changes most likely emerged from physiological mechanisms. Computer simulations confirmed that systematic rate changes of individual neurons could produce a directional 'bias' in the decoded neural cursor movements. Instability in apparent neuronal spike rates indeed yielded a directional bias in 56% of all performance assessments in participant cursor control (n = 2 participants, 108 and 20 assessments over two years), resulting in suboptimal performance in these sessions. SIGNIFICANCE: We anticipate that signal acquisition and decoding methods that can adapt to the reported instabilities will further improve the performance of intracortically-based NISs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23574741      PMCID: PMC3693851          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/3/036004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  61 in total

1.  Temporal interaction between single spikes and complex spike bursts in hippocampal pyramidal cells.

Authors:  K D Harris; H Hirase; X Leinekugel; D A Henze; G Buzsáki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Local field potentials allow accurate decoding of muscle activity.

Authors:  Robert D Flint; Christian Ethier; Emily R Oby; Lee E Miller; Marc W Slutzky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Propagating waves mediate information transfer in the motor cortex.

Authors:  Doug Rubino; Kay A Robbins; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-11-19       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Real-time decoding of nonstationary neural activity in motor cortex.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Statistical assessment of the stability of neural movement representations.

Authors:  Ian H Stevenson; Anil Cherian; Brian M London; Nicholas A Sachs; Eric Lindberg; Jacob Reimer; Marc W Slutzky; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Lee E Miller; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Challenges and opportunities for next-generation intracortically based neural prostheses.

Authors:  Vikash Gilja; Cindy A Chestek; Ilka Diester; Jaimie M Henderson; Karl Deisseroth; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Neural control of computer cursor velocity by decoding motor cortical spiking activity in humans with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Sung-Phil Kim; John D Simeral; Leigh R Hochberg; John P Donoghue; Michael J Black
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Massively parallel recording of unit and local field potentials with silicon-based electrodes.

Authors:  Jozsef Csicsvari; Darrell A Henze; Brian Jamieson; Kenneth D Harris; Anton Sirota; Péter Barthó; Kensall D Wise; György Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm.

Authors:  Leigh R Hochberg; Daniel Bacher; Beata Jarosiewicz; Nicolas Y Masse; John D Simeral; Joern Vogel; Sami Haddadin; Jie Liu; Sydney S Cash; Patrick van der Smagt; John P Donoghue
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  64 in total

1.  Three-dimensional macroporous nanoelectronic networks as minimally invasive brain probes.

Authors:  Chong Xie; Jia Liu; Tian-Ming Fu; Xiaochuan Dai; Wei Zhou; Charles M Lieber
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 43.841

2.  Glial responses to implanted electrodes in the brain.

Authors:  Joseph W Salatino; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai; Erin K Purcell
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 25.671

3.  A PDMS-based optical waveguide for transcutaneous powering of microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Ali Ersen; Mesut Sahin
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

4.  Robust Closed-Loop Control of a Cursor in a Person with Tetraplegia using Gaussian Process Regression.

Authors:  David M Brandman; Michael C Burkhart; Jessica Kelemen; Brian Franco; Matthew T Harrison; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Toward guiding principles for the design of biologically-integrated electrodes for the central nervous system.

Authors:  Cort H Thompson; Ti'Air E Riggins; Paras R Patel; Cynthia A Chestek; Wen Li; Erin Purcell
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Modulation depth estimation and variable selection in state-space models for neural interfaces.

Authors:  Wasim Q Malik; Leigh R Hochberg; John P Donoghue; Emery N Brown
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Functional remodeling of subtype-specific markers surrounding implanted neuroprostheses.

Authors:  Joseph W Salatino; Bailey M Winter; Matthew H Drazin; Erin K Purcell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Neurophysiology and neural engineering: a review.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Latent Factors and Dynamics in Motor Cortex and Their Application to Brain-Machine Interfaces.

Authors:  Chethan Pandarinath; K Cora Ames; Abigail A Russo; Ali Farshchian; Lee E Miller; Eva L Dyer; Jonathan C Kao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Stable long-term chronic brain mapping at the single-neuron level.

Authors:  Tian-Ming Fu; Guosong Hong; Tao Zhou; Thomas G Schuhmann; Robert D Viveros; Charles M Lieber
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 28.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.