| Literature DB >> 23573279 |
Franck Desmoulin1, Michel Galinier, Charlotte Trouillet, Matthieu Berry, Clément Delmas, Annie Turkieh, Pierre Massabuau, Heinrich Taegtmeyer, Fatima Smih, Philippe Rouet.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Mortality in heart failure (AHF) remains high, especially during the first days of hospitalization. New prognostic biomarkers may help to optimize treatment. The aim of the study was to determine metabolites that have a high prognostic value.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23573279 PMCID: PMC3616116 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060737
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Flow-chart of the study.
Characteristics of the patients with AHF.
| All patients | Favorable outcome | 30-day mortality | ||
| Characteristics | (n = 126) | (n = 98) | (n = 28) |
|
| Age (y) | 69 ± 15 | 69 ± 15 | 69 ± 13 | 0.881 |
| Sex, Female %, (n) | 39 (49) | 43 (42) | 25 (7) | 0.133 |
| BMI | 26 ± 5 | 27 ± 5 | 25 ± 7 | 0.396 |
| Cardiovascular risk factors | ||||
| Hypertensive %, (n) | 58 (73) | 61 (60) | 46 (13) | 0.230 |
| Diabete %, (n) | 38 (48) | 39 (39) | 32 (9) | 0.721 |
| Dyslipidemia %, (n) | 50 (63) | 51 (49) | 50 (14) | 0.903 |
| Obesity %, (n) | 16 (20) | 17 (16) | 14 (4) | 0.970 |
| Heridity CD %, (n) | 8 (10) | 8 (8) | 9 (2) | 0.822 |
| Previous cardiac disease | ||||
| Coronary artery disease %, (n) | 52 (65) | 52 (51) | 50 (14) | 0.978 |
| Valvular heart disease %, (n) | 30 (38) | 29 (29) | 32 (9) | 0.943 |
| Idiopatic dilated cardiomyopathy %, (n) | 13 (16) | 12 (12) | 14 (4) | 0.967 |
| Admission diagnosis | ||||
| New onset of AHF %, (n) | 41 (52) | 47 (46) | 22 (6) | 0.031 |
| Acute decompensation of CHF %, (n) | 59 (74) | 53 (52) | 78 (22) | 0.031 |
| Acute coronary syndrome %, (n) | 52 (65) | 52 (51) | 50 (14) | 0.978 |
| HF with reduced ejection fraction %, (n) | 71 (89) | 71 (69) | 71 (20) | 0.813 |
| Clinical presentation | ||||
| Pulmonary oedema or Hypertensive AHF %, (n) | 58 (73) | 72 (71) | 7 (2) | <0.001 |
| Cardiogenic shock %, (n) | 34 (43) | 21 (21) | 80 (22) | <0.001 |
| Acute right-sided heart failure %, (n) | 8 (10) | 7 (7) | 10 (3) | 0.532 |
| Admission medication | ||||
| ACE inhibitor %, (n) | 32 (40) | 36 (35) | 18 (5) | 0.112 |
| Angiotensin receptor blocker %, (n) | 2 (2) | 2 (2) | 0 (0) | 0.911 |
| Beta-blocker %, (n) | 33 (41) | 39 (38) | 10 (3) | 0.008 |
| Diuretic %, (n) | 91 (114) | 93 (92) | 80 (22) | 0.090 |
| Aldosterone antagonist %, (n) | 25 (31) | 24 (23) | 30 (8) | 0.615 |
| Antiplatelet agent %, (n) | 71 (89) | 69 (67) | 80 (22) | 0.315 |
| Vitamin K antagonist %, (n) | 31 (38) | 32 (31) | 27 (7) | 0.543 |
| Statine | 30 (37) | 33 (32) | 16 (5) | 0.131 |
| Early in-hospital management | ||||
| Inotropes administration | ||||
| Dobutamine %, (n) | 22 (28) | 14 (13) | 53 (15) | <0.001 |
| Norepinephrine %, (n) | 19 (24) | 9 (9) | 53 (15) | <0.001 |
| Epinephrine %, (n) | 7 (9) | 4 (4) | 18 (5) | 0.037 |
| Ventilatory assistance %, (n) | 27 (34) | 21 (21) | 46 (13) | 0.017 |
| Circulatory assistance %, (n) | 8 (10) | 6 (4) | 14 (6) | <0.001 |
| Laboratory data | ||||
| BNP (pg/ml) | 1172 ± 1131 | 1154 ± 1090 | 1237 ± 1281 | 0.738 |
| Na+ (mM) | 136 ± 4 | 136 ± 4 | 136 ± 6 | 0.412 |
| Creatinine (µM) | 140 ± 79 | 145 ± 81 | 162 ± 89 | 0.229 |
| C reactive protein (mg/l) | 53 ± 69 | 50 ± 69 | 64 ± 72 | 0.340 |
| Hb (g/dl) | 13 ± 2 | 13 ± 2 | 13 ± 2 | 0.634 |
| Glucose (mM) | 7 ± 2 | 7 ± 2 | 7 ± 3 | 0.408 |
| Bilirubin ( µM) | 20 ± 15 | 18 ± 14 | 23 ± 16 | 0.121 |
| Prothrombin ratio %, (n) | 66 ± 26 | 67 ± 25 | 59 ± 25 | 0.119 |
| LDL (g/l) | 1.04 ± 0.43 | 1.08 ± 0.43 | 0.84 ± 0.36 | 0.046 |
| HDL (g/l) | 0.45 ± 0.15 | 0.47± 0.15 | 0.35 ± 0.09 | 0.005 |
| TG (g/l) | 1.05 ± 0.43 | 1.05 ± 0.43 | 1.05 ± 0.37 | 0.963 |
| Admission vitals | ||||
| Mean blood pressure (mmHg) | 84 ± 25 | 89 ± 26 | 69 ± 13 | 0.004 |
| Heart rate (Bpm) | 91 ± 28 | 89 ± 31 | 97 ± 16 | 0.343 |
| Echocardiography | ||||
| LVEF %, (n) | 35 ± 16 | 35 ± 14 | 35 ± 21 | 0.831 |
| LVEF > 45% %, (n) | 25 (31) | 25 (24) | 26 (7) | 0.889 |
| LV telediastolic diameter (mm) | 61 ± 11 | 61 ± 11 | 62 ± 12 | 0.930 |
| Pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg) | 51 ± 16 | 52 ± 24 | 47 ± 21 | 0.453 |
| Electrocardiography | ||||
| Sinus rhythm %, (n) | 72 (90) | 73 (72) | 64 (18) | 0.495 |
| Radiography | ||||
| Cardiothoracic index (CI > 0.5)% | 58 ± 6 | 58 ± 6 | 58 ± 6 | 0.584 |
| APACHE II score, (IQR) | 14 (13−16) | 14 (12−15) | 17 (13−20) | <0.001 |
Heredity CD occurrence of cardiovascular disease in first degree relatives, AHF acute cardiac failure, CHF cardiac heart failure, HF heart failure, ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme, LDL low density lipoproteins, HDL high density lipoproteins, TG triglycerides, BMI body mass index, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LV left ventricular, BNP B-type Natriuretic Peptide concentration, APACHE II acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scoring system, IQR interquartile range.
Figure 2PLS-DA analysis of 1H NMR spectral data.
(A) PLS-DA t1/t2 score plot derived from 1H NMR spectral data correlating to 86% of the Y-variance. The plot shows how well individuals separate whether it is a survivor (blue spot) or a deceased (red spot) individual (number is for the identification of individual). (B) PLS-DA weight plot (w*c1/w*c2). This plot of the X- and Y-weights (w* and c) shows how the 1H NMR spectral data correlate with class belonging i.e. the survival or 30-day mortality classes. Variables corresponding to the 6 first higher variable influence parameters have a colored box; red when there are positively correlated with 30-day mortality class and blue when there are positively correlated with survival class. The triangles were labeled by spectral data identification. List of these discriminating variables is in Table 2.
Metabolites contributing to NMR spectral variables with higher influence on projection parameters values.
| Discriminating variables | Influence parameter | Contributing metabolites | Correlation Sign | |
| 30-Day mortality | Survival | |||
| Org_1.04 ppm | 2.36 | cholesterol | negative | positive |
| Org_0.68 ppm | 2.22 | cholesterol | negative | positive |
| Org_0.92 ppm | 2.10 | cholesterol | negative | positive |
| zg_1.34 ppm | 1.98 | lactate | positive | negative |
| cpmg_1.34 ppm | 1.81 | lactate | positive | negative |
| Aq_1.36 ppm | 1.80 | lactate | positive | negative |
Zg indicates that the variable was extracted from Zg-spectra, cpmg indicates that the variable was extracted from cpmg-spectra, Org indicates that the variable was extracted from Org-spectra obtained on lipophylic fractions of plasma extracts, Aq indicates that the variable was extracted from Aq-spectra obtained on hydrophilic fractions of plasma extracts, negative correlation sign corresponds to lower signal intensity of the variable in the group, positive correlation sign corresponds to higher signal intensity of the variable in the group.
Figure 31H NMR signals intensities of lactate and cholesterol in plasmas.
(A) Contribution of a 1H NMR characteristic signal of lactate at 1.36 ppm to the spectrum of aqueous fraction of the plasma extract (Aq spectrum). (B) Contribution of a 1H NMR characteristic signal of cholesterol at 0.68 ppm to the spectrum of lipid fraction of the plasma extract (Org spectrum). Values are expressed as arbitrary unit (AU). Lines at the middle for medians, boxes extend from 25th to 75th percentile, error bars for max and min values. Boxes: white, plasma from patients with favorable outcome; grey plasma from patients with 30-day mortality outcome. * is for Student’s t test p <0.05.
Figure 4Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
ROC curves analysis of lactate, cholesterol and lactate to cholesterol ratio in relation with 30-day mortality in the training cohort.
Receiver operating characteristic analysis results.
| Variables | AUC | 95% CI |
|
| Lactate | 0.73 | 0.60−0.85 | 0.0003 |
| Total Cholesterol | 0.76 | 0.67−0.85 | <0.0001 |
| Lact/Chol ratio | 0.82 | 0.73−0.89 | <0.0001 |
| APACHE II | 0.75* | 0.67−0.83 | <0.0001 |
AUC area under ROC curve, CI confident interval, APACHE II acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scoring system, P value tests the null hypothesis that the AUC really equals 0.5. * no significant difference between ROC curve of Apache II and Lact/Chol ratio, p = 0.389).
Figure 5Survival analysis of the patients according to the cholesterol to lactate ratio.
Kaplan−Meier curve estimation of the survival rate of the patients according to the cholesterol to lactate ratio at the cutoff value. A total of 126 AHF patients (training cohort) were included in this analysis based on Cobas Mira+ automated enzymatic detection of venous plasma lactate and cholesterol. Bold and dashed lines are for lactate/cholesterol ratio <0.4 and ≥ 0.4, respectively. Number at risk indicates over time the number of survival patients within each group based on lactate to cholesterol ratio (<0.4 and ≥ 0.4).
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of variables associated with 30-day mortality.
| Univariate Analysis | Mutlivariate analysis | ||||||||
| Variables | HR | 95% CI |
| HR | 95% CI |
| |||
| Age (y) | 1.00 | 0.98−1.03 | 0.85 | ||||||
| Sexe, male = 1 | 1.99 | 0.84−4.74 | 0.12 | ||||||
| Clinical presentation, CS = 1 |
| 3.53−22.12 | <0.001 |
| 2.79−17.50 | 0.001 | |||
| MAP, < 74 mmHg = 1 | 2.47 | 0.85−7.14 | 0.098 | ||||||
| Admission diagnosis, ADCHF = 1 |
| 1.01−6.36 | 0.048 | ||||||
| LDL ,< 0.99 g/l = 1 | 3.81 | 0.97−8.30 | 0.052 | ||||||
| HDL, < 0.36 g/l = 1 |
| 1.26 −10.03 | 0.017 | ||||||
| APACHE II |
| 1.12 −1.31 | <0.001 |
| 1.04−1.20 | 0.006 | |||
| Lact/Chol ratio, ≥ 0.40 = 1 |
| 2.13−15.48 | <0.001 |
| 1.34−9.63 | 0.011 | |||
| Lact/Chol ratio, 4th quartile | 7.22 | 3.04−17.12 | <0.001 | ||||||
CS cardiogenic shock; MAP Mean blood pressure, ADCHF acute decompensation of CHF, HR hazard ratio, CI confident interval, Lact/Chol Lactate/cholesterol, LDL low density lipoproteins, HDL high density lipoproteins, APACHE II acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scoring system.
HRs of 30-day mortality outcomes adjusted for age and sex.
stepwise regression, significance level of the model P < 0.0001.
HR of patients in the highest quartile of Lact/Chol ratio (4th quartile Lact/Chol = 0.80 (95%CI, 0.66−1.90, n = 29); HR = 1, 1st −3rd quartile Lact/Chol = 0.33 (95%CI, 0.29−0.36, n = 97)).
Statistically significant values are in bold.
Figure 6Survival analysis of the training cohort by the combination of clinical presentation and lactate to cholesterol ratio.
(A) Kaplan Meier survival curves for patients with AHF of the training cohort stratified into 4 groups based on the combination of clinical presentation (with or without cardiogenic shock (CS)) and the cutoff level of lactate to cholesterol ratio (Lact/Chol ratio). (B) Usefulness of 30-day mortality prediction using Lact/Chol ratio and clinical presentation. Hazard ratio with referent group (i.e. without CS and a Lact/Chol ratio < 0.4) for «Lact/Chol ratio ≥ 0.4 — without CS», 9 (p = 0.015); for « Lact/Chol ratio < 0.4 — with CS», 15 (p = 0.0014) and for « Lact/Chol ratio ≥ 0.4 — with CS», 41 (p<0.0001).
Characteristics of the patients of the validation cohort.
| All patients | Favorable outcome | 30-day mortality | |||||||
| Characteristics | (74) | (57) | (17) |
| |||||
| Age (y) | 72 ± 15 | 71 ± 16 | 73 ± 16 | 0.648 | |||||
| Sex, Female %, (n) | 30 (22) | 32 (18) | 24 (4) | 0.763 | |||||
| BMI | 26 ± 5 | 26 ± 5 | 27 ± 7 | 0.749 | |||||
| Cardiovascular risk factors | |||||||||
| Hypertensive %, (n) | 61 (45) | 61(35) | 59 (10) | 1.000 | |||||
| Diabete (%) | 34 (25) | 33 (19) | 35 (6) | 1.000 | |||||
| Dyslipidemia %, (n) | 38 (28) | 35 (20) | 47 (8) | 0.404 | |||||
| Obesity %, (n) | 21 (16) | 23 (13) | 18 (3) | 0.749 | |||||
| Clinical presentation | |||||||||
| Congestive heart failure %, (n) | 44 (33) | 44 (25) | 47 (8) | 1.000 | |||||
| Cardiogenic shock %, (n) | 15 (11) | 9 (5) | 35 (6) | 0.014 | |||||
| Pulmonary oedema or Hypertensive AHF%,(n) | 27 (20) | 32 (18) | 12 (2) | 0.130 | |||||
| Admission medication | |||||||||
| ACE inhibitor %, (n) | 28 (21) | 30 (17) | 24 (4) | 0.763 | |||||
| Angiotensin receptor blocker %, (n) | 4 (3) | 5 (3) | 0 (0) | 1.000 | |||||
| Beta-blocker %, (n) | 30 (22) | 32 (18) | 24 (4) | 0.763 | |||||
| Diuretic %, (n) | 89 (66) | 91 (52) | 82 (14) | 0.090 | |||||
| Aldosterone antagonist %, (n) | 10 (7) | 5 (3) | 24 (4) | 0.044 | |||||
| Antiplatelet agent %, (n) | 63 (47) | 63 (36) | 65 (11) | 1.000 | |||||
| Early in-hospital management | |||||||||
| Inotropes administration | |||||||||
| Dobutamine%, (n) | 16 (12) | 12 (7) | 30 (5) | <0.131 | |||||
| Norepinephrine %, (n) | 18 (13) | 10 (6) | 42 (7) | <0.008 | |||||
| Epinephrine %, (n) | 12 (9) | 7 (4) | 30 (5) | 0.037 | |||||
| Ventilatory assistance %, (n) | 46 (34) | 37 (21) | 78 (13) | 0.017 | |||||
| Circulatory assistance %, (n) | 13 (10) | 7 (4) | 36 (6) | <0.001 | |||||
| Laboratory data | |||||||||
| BNP (pg/ml) | 1378 ± 1268 | 1354 ± 1311 | 1455 ± 1147 | 0.301 | |||||
| Na+ (mM) | 136 ± 5 | 137 ± 4 | 134 ± 7 | 0.049 | |||||
| Creatinine (µM) | 151 ± 94 | 147 ± 94 | 167 ± 93 | 0.179 | |||||
| C reactive protein (mg/l) | 76 ± 75 | 75 ± 73 | 75 ± 86 | 0.676 | |||||
| Glucose (mM) | 8 ± 4 | 8 ± 3 | 11 ± 7 | 0.086 | |||||
| Bilirubin (µM) | 20 ± 15 | 20 ± 16 | 18 ± 12 | 0.607 | |||||
| Prothrombin ratio (%) | 67 ± 20 | 67 ± 19 | 64 ± 21 | 0.649 | |||||
| Admission vitals | |||||||||
| Mean blood pressure (mmHg) | 80 ± 15 | 82 ± 14 | 73 ± 15 | 0.021 | |||||
| Heart rate (Bpm) | 87 ± 28 | 89 ± 31 | 88 ± 31 | 0.852 | |||||
| Echocardiography | |||||||||
| LVEF (%) | 36 ± 14 | 38 ± 15 | 31 ± 12 | 0.089 | |||||
| LVEF > 45%, (n) | 27 (20) | 30 (17) | 18 (3) | 0.372 | |||||
| Electrocardiography | |||||||||
| Sinus rhythm %, (n) | 57 (42) | 63 (36) | 35 (6) | 0.053 | |||||
ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme, LDL low density lipoproteins, HDL high density lipoproteins, TG triglycerides, BMI body mass index, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LV left ventricular, BNP B-type Natriuretic Peptide concentration. Numbers in parenthesis indicate number of patients.
Figure 7Predictive power of the Lact/Chol ratio in the validation cohort.
Patients of the validation cohort were included (n = 74) in this analysis: with favorable outcome (n = 57) and with 30-day mortality outcome (n = 17). (A) Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of lactate, cholesterol and lactate to cholesterol ratio in relation with 30-day mortality), AUC = 0.76 (95% CI, 0.65−0.85, p<0.0001). (B) Kaplan–Meier curve estimation of the survival rate of the patients according to the cholesterol to lactate ratio at the cutoff value. Bold and dashed lines are for lactate/cholesterol ratio <0.4 and ≥ 0.4, respectively. Number at risk indicates over time the number of survival patients within each group based on lactate to cholesterol ratio (<0.4 and ≥ 0.4).
Cox regression analysis for 30-day mortality in the validation cohort.
| Univariate Analysis | Mutlivariate analysis = | |||||
| Variables | HR | 95% CI |
| HR | 95% CI |
|
| Age (y) | 1.00 | 0.97−1.04 | 0.636 | |||
| Sexe, male = 1 | 0.83 | 0.27−2.57 | 0.752 | |||
| Clinical presentation, CS = 1 |
| 2.45−29.66 | <0.001 | 2.70 | 0.93−7.64 | 0.062 |
| Lact/Chol ratio, ≥ 0.4 = 1 |
| 1.77−17.08 | 0.003 |
| 1.17−23.98 | 0.031 |
| MAP, < 74 mmHg = 1 |
| 1.16−8.52 | 0.024 | |||
| Serum sodium, <136 mM |
| 1.08−8.37 | 0.032 | |||
HRs of 30-day mortality outcomes adjusted for age and sex. = Cox proportional-hazards stepwise regression with clinical presentation CS, Lact/Chol ratio, MAP and serum sodium as predictor variables, significance level of the model P = 0.002. CS, cardiogenic shock. HR, hazard ratio. CI, confident interval. Figures in bold are statistically significant.