Literature DB >> 20447528

Mid-region pro-hormone markers for diagnosis and prognosis in acute dyspnea: results from the BACH (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure) trial.

Alan Maisel1, Christian Mueller, Richard Nowak, W Frank Peacock, Judd W Landsberg, Piotr Ponikowski, Martin Mockel, Christopher Hogan, Alan H B Wu, Mark Richards, Paul Clopton, Gerasimos S Filippatos, Salvatore Di Somma, Inder Anand, Leong Ng, Lori B Daniels, Sean-Xavier Neath, Robert Christenson, Mihael Potocki, James McCord, Garret Terracciano, Dimitrios Kremastinos, Oliver Hartmann, Stephan von Haehling, Andreas Bergmann, Nils G Morgenthaler, Stefan D Anker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to assess the diagnostic utility of mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) for the diagnosis of acute heart failure (AHF) and the prognostic value of mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) in patients with AHF.
BACKGROUND: There are some caveats and limitations to natriuretic peptide testing in the acute dyspneic patient.
METHODS: The BACH (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure) trial was a prospective, 15-center, international study of 1,641 patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnea. A noninferiority test of MR-proANP versus B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) for diagnosis of AHF and a superiority test of MR-proADM versus BNP for 90-day survival were conducted. Other end points were exploratory.
RESULTS: MR-proANP (> or =120 pmol/l) proved noninferior to BNP (> or =100 pg/ml) for the diagnosis of AHF (accuracy difference 0.9%). In tests of secondary diagnostic objectives, MR-proANP levels added to the utility of BNP levels in patients with intermediate BNP values and with obesity but not in renal insufficiency, the elderly, or patients with edema. Using cut-off values from receiver-operating characteristic analysis, the accuracy to predict 90-day survival of heart failure patients was 73% (95% confidence interval: 70% to 77%) for MR-proADM and 62% (95% confidence interval: 58% to 66%) for BNP (difference p < 0.001). In adjusted multivariable Cox regression, MR-proADM, but not BNP, carried independent prognostic value (p < 0.001). Results were consistent using NT-proBNP instead of BNP (p < 0.001). None of the biomarkers was able to predict rehospitalization or visits to the emergency department with clinical relevance.
CONCLUSIONS: MR-proANP is as useful as BNP for AHF diagnosis in dyspneic patients and may provide additional clinical utility when BNP is difficult to interpret. MR-proADM identifies patients with high 90-day mortality risk and adds prognostic value to BNP. (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure [BACH]; NCT00537628). Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20447528     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  124 in total

Review 1.  [Cardiac biomarkers in the critically ill].

Authors:  S Reith; N Marx
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  Mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and pro-adrenomedullin testing for the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of patients with acute dyspnoea.

Authors:  Ravi V Shah; Quynh A Truong; Hanna K Gaggin; Jens Pfannkuche; Oliver Hartmann; James L Januzzi
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  Biomarker-guided therapy for heart failure.

Authors:  K Sarat Chandra
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012-04-28

Review 4.  Old and new tools to assess dyspnea in the hospitalized patient.

Authors:  Barbro Kjellström; Martje H L van der Wal
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-09

Review 5.  Clinical use of novel biomarkers in heart failure: towards personalized medicine.

Authors:  Daniela Schmitter; Gadi Cotter; Adriaan A Voors
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 6.  Cardiac biomarkers: new tools for heart failure management.

Authors:  Navaid Iqbal; Bailey Wentworth; Rajiv Choudhary; Alejandro De La Parra Landa; Benjamin Kipper; Arrash Fard; Alan S Maisel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-06

Review 7.  Novel Biomarkers to Detect Target Organ Damage in Acute Hypertension.

Authors:  Stephen Boone; Dick Kuo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 8.  Organ dysfunction, injury and failure in acute heart failure: from pathophysiology to diagnosis and management. A review on behalf of the Acute Heart Failure Committee of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Veli-Pekka Harjola; Wilfried Mullens; Marek Banaszewski; Johann Bauersachs; Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Ovidiu Chioncel; Sean P Collins; Wolfram Doehner; Gerasimos S Filippatos; Andreas J Flammer; Valentin Fuhrmann; Mitja Lainscak; Johan Lassus; Matthieu Legrand; Josep Masip; Christian Mueller; Zoltán Papp; John Parissis; Elke Platz; Alain Rudiger; Frank Ruschitzka; Andreas Schäfer; Petar M Seferovic; Hadi Skouri; Mehmet Birhan Yilmaz; Alexandre Mebazaa
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 15.534

Review 9.  Biomarkers in cardiovascular disease: Statistical assessment and section on key novel heart failure biomarkers.

Authors:  Ravi Dhingra; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 6.677

10.  [Essential cardiac biomarkers in myocardial infarction and heart failure].

Authors:  M Mueller; E Giannitsis; H A Katus
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.