Literature DB >> 23572401

Progressively increasing fracture risk with advancing age after initial incident fragility fracture: the Tromsø study.

Luai Awad Ahmed1, Jacqueline R Center, Ashild Bjørnerem, Dana Bluic, Ragnar M Joakimsen, Lone Jørgensen, Haakon E Meyer, Nguyen D Nguyen, Tuan V Nguyen, Tone K Omsland, Jan Størmer, Grethe S Tell, Tineke Acm van Geel, John A Eisman, Nina Emaus.   

Abstract

The risk of subsequent fracture is increased after initial fractures; however, proper understanding of its magnitude is lacking. This population-based study examines the subsequent fracture risk in women and men by age and type of initial incident fracture. All incident nonvertebral fractures between 1994 and 2009 were registered in 27,158 participants in the Tromsø Study, Norway. The analysis included 3108 subjects with an initial incident fracture after the age of 49 years. Subsequent fracture (n = 664) risk was expressed as rate ratios (RR) and absolute proportions irrespective of death. The rates of both initial and subsequent fractures increased with age, the latter with the steepest curve. Compared with initial incident fracture rate of 30.8 per 1000 in women and 12.9 per 1000 in men, the overall age-adjusted RR of subsequent fracture was 1.3 (95% CI, 1.2-1.5) in women, and 2.0 (95% CI, 1.6-2.4) in men. Although the RRs decreased with age, the absolute proportions of those with initial fracture who suffered a subsequent fracture increased with age; from 9% to 30% in women and from 10% to 26% in men, between the age groups 50-59 to 80+ years. The type of subsequent fracture varied by age from mostly minor fractures in the youngest to hip or other major fractures in the oldest age groups, irrespective of type and severity of initial fracture. In women and men, 45% and 38% of the subsequent hip or other major fractures, respectively, were preceded by initial minor fractures. The risk of subsequent fracture is high in all age groups. At older age, severe subsequent fracture types follow both clinically severe and minor initial incident fractures. Any fragility fracture in the elderly reflects the need for specific osteoporosis management to reduce further fracture risk.
© 2013 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FRACTURE; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURE; POPULATION-BASED STUDY; SUBSEQUENT FRACTURE

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23572401     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  23 in total

1.  Unmasking romosozumab: response to commentsby Uzoigwe et al.

Authors:  F Cosman; D B Crittenden; C Libanati
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Barriers to secondary fracture prevention in primary care.

Authors:  A S Mendis; K Ganda; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Education, marital status, and risk of hip fractures in older men and women: the CHANCES project.

Authors:  V Benetou; P Orfanos; D Feskanich; K Michaëlsson; U Pettersson-Kymmer; L A Ahmed; A Peasey; A Wolk; H Brenner; M Bobak; T Wilsgaard; B Schöttker; K-U Saum; A Bellavia; F Grodstein; E Klinaki; E Valanou; E-M Papatesta; P Boffetta; A Trichopoulou
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The association between childhood fractures and adolescence bone outcomes: a population-based study, the Tromsø Study, Fit Futures.

Authors:  T Christoffersen; N Emaus; E Dennison; A-S Furberg; L Gracia-Marco; G Grimnes; O A Nilsen; D Vlachopoulos; A Winther; L A Ahmed
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  High Cardiorespiratory Fitness Is Associated with Reduced Risk of Low Bone Density in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Laura F DeFina; David Leonard; Benjamin L Willis; Carolyn E Barlow; Carrie E Finley; Marjorie R Jenkins; Barbara C Pence; Yan Zhang; Ming-Chien Chyu; E Michael Lewiecki; Chwan-Li Shen
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Menstrual and reproductive factors and risk of vertebral fractures in Japanese women: the Japan Public Health Center-based prospective (JPHC) study.

Authors:  Y Shimizu; N Sawada; K Nakamura; Y Watanabe; K Kitamura; M Iwasaki; S Tsugane
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Impact of osteoporotic fracture type and subsequent fracture on mortality: the Tromsø Study.

Authors:  D Alarkawi; D Bliuc; T Tran; L A Ahmed; N Emaus; A Bjørnerem; L Jørgensen; T Christoffersen; J A Eisman; J R Center
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  "Age Is Just a Number": Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Over 75.

Authors:  Jacob E Tulipan; Aron Lechtig; Tamara D Rozental; Carl M Harper
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-02-26

Review 9.  Approaches to Fracture Risk Assessment and Prevention.

Authors:  Sanford Baim; Robert Blank
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 10.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Jennifer S Walsh; Richard Eastell
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 43.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.