Literature DB >> 23571707

Copulatory behavior in a pholcid spider: males use specialized genitalic movements for sperm removal and copulatory courtship.

Lucía Calbacho-Rosa1, Ivette Galicia-Mendoza, María Sofía Dutto, Alex Córdoba-Aguilar, Alfredo V Peretti.   

Abstract

Sexual selection may operate on pre-copulatory, copulatory, and post-copulatory traits. An example of a copulatory target of sexual selection is the genitalic movements a male performs during copulation. These movements may function either to prevent sperm competition or to influence a female's fertilization decision. Here we investigated how copulation duration, pedipalp movements, and abdominal movements that males of the pholcid spider Holocnemus pluchei produce during copulation influence sperm removal and/or patterns of successful sperm transfer. We compared mating events with virgin and mated females for differences in copulatory and post-copulatory behavior. We expected longer copulation duration, longer pedipalp movement duration, and more complex and frequent pedipalp and abdominal movements when males mated with mated females compared to virgin females. Except for abdominal movements, our results corroborated these predictions. Furthermore, when we investigated mating events with mated females, we observed sperm mass ejection from the female gonopore and physical removal of sperm by males' procursi. Females with interrupted second mating events showed a significant reduction of stored sperm masses compared to females with completed mating events. We suggest that males use alternating pedipalp movements to remove most of the rival sperm stored by mated females prior to sperm transfer. Copulation duration and pedipalp movements can be further used to transfer sperm and/or as a form of genitalic copulatory courtship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23571707     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-013-1038-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  14 in total

1.  Copulation duration and fertilization success in a damselfly: an example of cryptic female choice?

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males.

Authors:  T Pizzari; T R Birkhead
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Cryptic female choice via sperm dumping favours male copulatory courtship in a spider.

Authors:  A V Peretti; W G Eberhard
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 4.  Sexual selection research on spiders: progress and biases.

Authors:  Bernhard A Huber
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-08

Review 5.  Sexual selection and sperm quantity: meta-analyses of strategic ejaculation.

Authors:  Clint D Kelly; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-03-17

6.  EVIDENCE FOR WIDESPREAD COURTSHIP DURING COPULATION IN 131 SPECIES OF INSECTS AND SPIDERS, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CRYPTIC FEMALE CHOICE.

Authors:  William G Eberhard
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in red flour beetles Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  M Edvardsson; G Arnqvist
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Impact of male mating history on the temporal sperm dynamics of Choristoneura rosaceana and C. fumiferana females.

Authors:  Mireille Marcotte; Johanne Delisle; Jeremy N McNeil
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.354

Review 9.  Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin's omission and its consequences.

Authors:  William G Eberhard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The male genital system of the cellar spider Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin, 1775) (Pholcidae, Araneae): development of spermatozoa and seminal secretion.

Authors:  Peter Michalik; Gabriele Uhl
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 3.172

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Sperm competition when transfer is dangerous.

Authors:  Cristina Tuni; Jutta Schneider; Gabriele Uhl; Marie E Herberstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Material heterogeneity of male genitalia reduces genital damage in a bushcricket during sperm removal behaviour.

Authors:  Yoko Matsumura; Mohsen Jafarpour; Steven A Ramm; Klaus Reinhold; Stanislav N Gorb; Hamed Rajabi
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2020-11-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.