Literature DB >> 23571676

Re-annotation of protein-coding genes in 10 complete genomes of Neisseriaceae family by combining similarity-based and composition-based methods.

Feng-Biao Guo1, Lifeng Xiong, Jade L L Teng, Kwok-Yung Yuen, Susanna K P Lau, Patrick C Y Woo.   

Abstract

In this paper, we performed a comprehensive re-annotation of protein-coding genes by a systematic method combining composition- and similarity-based approaches in 10 complete bacterial genomes of the family Neisseriaceae. First, 418 hypothetical genes were predicted as non-coding using the composition-based method and 413 were eliminated from the gene list. Both the scatter plot and cluster of orthologous groups (COG) fraction analyses supported the result. Second, from 20 to 400 hypothetical proteins were assigned with functions in each of the 10 strains based on the homology search. Among newly assigned functions, 397 are so detailed to have definite gene names. Third, 106 genes missed by the original annotations were picked up by an ab initio gene finder combined with similarity alignment. Transcriptional experiments validated the effectiveness of this method in Laribacter hongkongensis and Chromobacterium violaceum. Among the 106 newly found genes, some deserve particular interests. For example, 27 transposases were newly found in Neiserria meningitidis alpha14. In Neiserria gonorrhoeae NCCP11945, four new genes with putative functions and definite names (nusG, rpsN, rpmD and infA) were found and homologues of them usually are essential for survival in bacteria. The updated annotations for the 10 Neisseriaceae genomes provide a more accurate prediction of protein-coding genes and a more detailed functional information of hypothetical proteins. It will benefit research into the lifestyle, metabolism, environmental adaption and pathogenicity of the Neisseriaceae species. The re-annotation procedure could be used directly, or after the adaption of detailed methods, for checking annotations of any other bacterial or archaeal genomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  eliminated non-coding ORFs; newly assigned functions; newly found genes; re-annotation; the Neisseriaceae family

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23571676      PMCID: PMC3686433          DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dst009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Res        ISSN: 1340-2838            Impact factor:   4.458


Introduction

The emergence of next-generation DNA sequencing techniques accelerate tremendously the increment of sequences deposited in public nucleotide databases. The wealth of sequence data stimulates wonderful opportunity to understand the biological process of various living species. To achieve this aim, two of the essential steps are identifying all protein-coding genes and trying to assign their functions. They are jointly named as genome annotation. The quality of the genome annotation is very vital. If one genome could not be annotated accurately but still submitted to the public database, not only subsequent researches based on it may encounter problems but also annotations of after sequenced closely related genomes would be influenced. The annotation errors may propagate and finally affect more and more genomes. Recognizing this serious problem, Ouzounis and Kap[1] appealed to update regularly the genome annotation by latest database and methods. As for prokaryotes, dozens of genomes have been re-annotated.[2] Three kinds of re-annotations are often performed in sequenced prokaryotic genomes. First, and rather early, falsely predicted protein-coding genes are eliminated from the original annotation using composition-based methods. For example, Wang and Zhang[3] suggested that 172 annotated genes were very unlikely to encode proteins in the genome of Vibrio cholerae based on single-nucleotide frequencies. One of the typical re-annotation cases of archaea was associated with Aeropyrum pernix K1, in which protein-coding genes were over-annotated up to 60% by the original sequencing institute.[4-6] It is lucky that this major error has been corrected by using proteome approaches and bioinformatics methods.[7-10] Amsacta moorei entomopoxvirus may have the most over-annotated protein-coding genes among sequenced viruses.[11] Guo and Yu[12] suggested that ∼38 of 294 originally annotated genes did not encode proteins based on the Z-curve method. By using another graphical method, Yu and Sun[13] confirmed this speculation. Second, some genes may be missed by the original annotation and could be picked up by the ab initio gene finding method and further confirmed by the similarity alignment or transcription and/or protein expression proofs. For example, Zhou et al.[14] newly added 278 potential genes by the similarity alignment and another 147 by detectable mRNA transcriptions in the genome of Xanthomonas campestris. Very recently, Du et al.[15] newly added eight potential genes by the similarity-based method in the archaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum. Assigning functions to hypothetical proteins constitutes the last kind of re-annotation. This type of re-annotation may be performed by using the homology alignment or by functional genomic experiments. For example, 149 hypothetical proteins were assigned detailed functions according to the strict homology information in the genome of Erwinia carotovora.[16] A similar method was employed to the genome of P. aerophilum and 80 hypothetical proteins were assigned with functional information.[15] Based on cellular fractions and expression profiles under different culture conditions, Okamoto and Yamada[17] provided general functional information for 126 hypothetical proteins in the genome of Streptococcus pyogenes. In this study, we performed all three types of re-annotation in 10 complete genomes of the Neisseriaceae family. As far as our knowledge goes, the only example involved with all three types of re-annotation is the updated annotation in the genome of P. aerophilum.[15] Through them, the outdated annotation may be corrected as far as possible. However, alternative approaches may be utilized to obtain similar results with the systematic method used here. Compared with our previous work,[15] here, we used transcriptional analyses to validate the effectiveness of our method to pick up new genes. The Neisseriaceae family belongs to β-proteobacteria. Among the 10 Neisseriaceae strains analyzed in this work, seven belong to the genus Neisseria and all can colonize the mucosal surfaces of many animals. Neiserria meningitidis, as one of the most common causes of bacterial meningitis, are most virulent in human.[18] Laribacter hongkongensis is a recently sequenced bacterium associated with invasive blood stream infections in patients with liver cirrhosis as well as gastroenteritis and traveler's diarrhea.[19-22] Updated annotations of these bacterial strains would help to understand their pathogenicities and environment adaptation capacities.

Material and methods

Data source

Ten complete genomes of the family Neisseriaceae were included in this work. They were Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 12472 (RefSeq accession number: NC_005085), L. hongkongensis HLHK9 (NC_012559), N. gonorrhoeae FA 1090 (NC_002946), N. gonorrhoeae NCCP11945 (NC_011035), N. lactamica 020-06 (NC_014752), N. meningitidis 053442 (NC_010120), N. meningitidis alpha14 (NC_013016), N. meningitidis MC58 (NC_0031112), N. meningitidis Z2491 (NC_003116) and Pseudogulbenkiania sp. NH8B (NC_016002). Among them, two strains of N. gonorrhoeae and four strains of N. meningitidis and L. hongkongensis are pathogens. In fact, dozens of strains in the family Neisseriaceae have been sequenced.[23] However, the NCBI RefSeq project provides curated annotations only for these strains.[24] In this work, we chose the 10 complete genomes to perform re-annotation.

Method to pick up missed genes

In each sequenced genome, there are always some bona fide genes that have been missed by the original annotation. For example, Warren et al.[25] uncovered 38 895 intergenic open reading frames (ORFs), readily identified as putative genes by similarity to currently annotated genes, from 1297 prokaryotic replicons based on across-genome alignment. New genes could be confirmed by the similarity alignment or by transcription or proteome analyses. In this work, we first used the ZCURVE[26] program, which is freely available at http://tubic.tju.edu.cn/Zcurve_B/, to pick out all candidate genes that did not have same 5′ terminals with all genes in the original annotation. The candidate may overlap one annotated gene with their sequences but they did not correspond to the same reading frame. Then those candidate new genes would be filtered by blast[27] against the NCBI nr database. If one candidate met the following three conditions, it would be regarded as genuine genes: (i) it had the significant similarity (E-value < 10−20, Coverage > 60% and Identity > 50%) with annotated genes in bacteria beyond the same genus in the database, and it had the similar length with the counterpart (difference < 20%); (ii) it had counterpart in the cluster of orthologous groups (COG) database, i.e. it could be assigned within an existed COG cluster; (iii) it did not overlap annotated genes with any bases or it had a smaller E-value and a higher identity score against functional genes in the other genomes in the case of overlapping. This process has been standardized in this work. For each of the 10 strains, all parameters in the whole process were fixed.

Method to eliminate over-annotated genes

A composition-based method was used to eliminate over-annotated genes. The method is based on the Z-curve representation of the DNA sequences, which has been successfully used to find genes in various microbes.[3,7,9,12,15,16,28,29] In this analysis, 33 Z-curve variables were adopted,[26] including nine variables of phase-dependent single-nucleotide frequencies[28] and 24 of phase-dependent dinucleotide frequencies.[26] In fact, there are 36 variables denoting phase-dependent dinucleotides.[30] However, long-range correlations between the first and third codon positions tend to be weaker and so 12 variables associated with them were discarded. For details about these variables, refer to Guo et al.[26] Besides 33 classifying features, the Fisher linear discrimination algorithm was used to optimally differentiate protein-coding and non-coding sequences, the procedure was as detailed previously.[28] The training set of the classifying model comprised a positive sample set and a negative sample set. The positive sample set was those function-known genes with definite names, e.g. gyrB as the name of gene encoding protein of DNA gyrase subunit B. The negative sample was generated by a randomly shuffling sequence of the positive sample and thus destroying its natural structure. After parameters have been trained based on positive and negative samples, all hypothetical proteins would be decided to be genuine genes or falsely annotated non-coding sequences. The latter would be eliminated in the updated annotation. The scatter plot in Figure 1 illustrates the effectiveness of the method to eliminate non-coding ORFs from the collection of hypothetical proteins. A web server has been constructed to check hypothetical genes and eliminate non-coding ORFs in any sequenced bacterial or archaeal genomes, which is freely available at http://147.8.74.24/Zfisher/.
Figure 1.

Distribution of GC2 versus GC3 for four types of sequences. The x-axis indicates the value of GC2 and the y-axis denotes the value of GC3. (A) For 969 function-known genes in L. hongkongensis; (B) for 86 predicted non-coding genes in L. hongkongensis; (C) for 915 retained hypothetical genes in L. hongkongensis and (D) for 20 horizontally transferred genes in P. aeruginosa.

Distribution of GC2 versus GC3 for four types of sequences. The x-axis indicates the value of GC2 and the y-axis denotes the value of GC3. (A) For 969 function-known genes in L. hongkongensis; (B) for 86 predicted non-coding genes in L. hongkongensis; (C) for 915 retained hypothetical genes in L. hongkongensis and (D) for 20 horizontally transferred genes in P. aeruginosa.

Method to assign functions to hypothetical proteins

Hypothetical proteins after refining by the above process would be submitted to the nr database. Those with highly significant similarities with function-known genes in the database would be assigned the same functions. To achieve more sensitive results, amino acid (aa) sequences of hypothetical genes were actually aligned against protein sequences translated from the nr nucleotide database.[27] To ensure strict homology, the aligned length covered at least 80% of each gene with the identity of >70% and the E-value of <1e−20. According to the above thresholds, if one hypothetical gene with a translated aa sequence matched two or more proteins with the same functions, then the function information would be transferred to the hypothetical protein.[18]

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Laribacter hongkongensis HLHK9 is a clinical isolate in Hong Kong and its complete genome sequence was available recently.[21] It was grown at 37°C, in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth or on BHI agar plates (BD, USA). Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 12472 is a type strain and its complete genome sequence is also available in Genbank.[31] Chromobacterium violaceum was cultured in nutrient broth or nutrient agar (Oxoid, England) at 26°C. Unless indicated otherwise, bacteria were cultured to the log-phase for experiment (∼0.6 at OD600).

Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction

The total bacterial RNA was extracted by using the RNeasy mini kit following the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen, Germany). Genomic DNA was removed by DNase digestion using RNase-free DNase I (Roche Diagnostic, Switzerland) as described by the manufacturer. Reverse transcription (RT) was performed using Superscript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. One microlitre of cDNA was used as a template for RT–polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with each specific primer pair. Mock RT–PCR without reverse transcriptase was also conducted as control. Triplicate assays using RNAs extracted in three independent experiments were performed for each target gene.

Results

Eliminated non-coding ORFs and the graphic proof

All ab initio gene finders would predict a certain number of non-coding ORFs as potential genes and these predictions constitute false positives of gene annotation.[32] To ensure less species-specific genes be missed from the annotation result, one or more ab initio gene finders are necessary in the process of annotating prokaryotic genomes.[33] Often, similarity alignment methods are combined with ab initio methods to achieve better results. Because of the intervention of the latter, it is not inevitable that some non-coding ORFs will appear in the final list of potential genes in every sequenced genome.[34] They may constitute source of annotation errors of closely related genomes and thus should be eliminated from the current annotations. According to the RefSeq[24] annotation for each Neisseriaceae strain, all annotated genes could be classified into three groups. The first group contains only function-known genes with definite names. The last group includes those genes encoding hypothetical proteins. The remaining genes constitute the second group. Obviously, the first group encodes proteins without any uncertainty. Coding potentials of the third group would be doubted to some extent. Therefore, we focus on the third group, hypothetical genes, in this work. Numbers of genes belong to the first and third groups and genomic characteristics of each strain are listed in Table 1. As can been seen, ratios of the numbers of the first and third class genes to the total gene number vary significantly. For example, N. gonorrhoeae FA 1090 has the highest ratio of hypothetical genes, whereas almost the least ratio of function-known genes with definite names. This illustrates that the function annotation in this strain is much poorer compared with the other strains. The variation of the gene ratio is associated with many factors, such as annotation methods, genomic G + C contents and the number of closely related genomes that have been sequenced when annotating the strain.
Table 1.

Statistical information in genomes of the 10 Neisseriaceae strains

StrainsPublished yearaGene density (kb)Genome size (bp)Gene numberG + C content (%)First class gene (ratio)Third class gene (ratio)
C. violaceum18 September 20030.9274 751 080440564.81494 (33.9%)1714 (38.9%)
L. hongkongensis14 April 20091.0213 169 329323562.4969 (30.0%)1001 (30.1%)
N. gonorrhoeae FA 109015 February 20050.9302 153 922200252.7266 (13.3%)800 (40.0%)
N. gonorrhoeae NCCP119459 July 20081.1952 232 025266852.4244 (9.1%)996 (37.3%)
N. lactamica16 December 20100.8882 220 606197252.3744 (37.7%)657 (33.3%)
N. meningitidis 0534423 December 20070.9382 153 416202051.7875 (43.3%)645 (31.9%)
N. meningitidis Alpha 1424 July 20090.8722 145 295187252.0865 (46.2%)467 (25.0%)
N. meningitidis MC5810 March 20000.9082 272 360206351.5806 (39.1%)810 (39.3%)
N. meningitidis Z249130 March 20000.8742 184 406190951.8459 (24.0%)669 (35.0%)
Pseudogulbenkiania8 September 20110.9264 332 995401264.4704 (17.5%)831 (20.7%)

aInformation of published date were extracted from http://www.genomesonline.org/.

Statistical information in genomes of the 10 Neisseriaceae strains aInformation of published date were extracted from http://www.genomesonline.org/. The training set needed the Z-curve method with 33 variables was used to filter over-annotated genes from the RefSeq annotations of 10 Neisseriaceae strains. For each of them, function-known genes with definite names were chosen and shuffled sequences were correspondingly generated. Thus, the training set was obtained. For example, in L. hongkongensis, the training set was comprised of 969 function-known genes that correspond to positive samples, and 969 shuffled sequences corresponding to negative samples. Based on the training set, the discriminant model was built. The accuracy of the model based on 5-fold cross-validation is listed in Table 2 for each of the 10 strains. With the model, each hypothetical protein was decided to be a genuine gene or a falsely predicted ORF. Consequently, 86 hypothetical genes were predicted as a non-coding ORF by the Z-curve method in the genome of L. hongkongensis.
Table 2.

Accuracy based on 5-fold cross-validation and the COG ratio in each strain

StrainAccuracy of the method (%)Class 1 with COG (% ratio)Predicted non-coding ORFsPredicted non-coding with COG (% ratio)
C. violaceum1001457 (97.5)880 (0)
L. hongkongensis99.90954 (98.7)861 (1.2)
N. gonorrhoeae FA 1090100263 (98.9)241 (4.2)
N. gonorrhoeae NCCP11945100241 (98.9)560 (0)
N. lactamica99.87725 (97.4)80 (0)
N. meningitidis 05344299.77851 (97.3)371 (2.7)
N. meningitidis Alpha 1499.77840 (97.1)251 (4.0)
N. meningitidis MC5899.75790 (98.0)480 (0)
N. meningitidis Z2491100456 (99.3)120 (0)
Pseudogulbenkiania99.86683 (97.0)341 (2.9)
Accuracy based on 5-fold cross-validation and the COG ratio in each strain Prediction of 86 hypothetical genes as non-coding is based on the assumption that all protein-coding genes should have similar nucleotide composition in one specific bacterial genome.[28] That is to say, hypothetical genes should have similar composition features with function-known genes in L. hongkongensis. If not, they should have been over-annotated as genes. The scatter plot of the nucleotide distribution of 969 function-known genes and 86 predicted non-coding ORFs is shown in Figure 1A and B. As can be seen, non-coding ORFs are distributed far away from function-known genes. In detail, almost all function-known genes lie far above the diagonal and G + C contents of them at the second codon positions are much lower than that at the third codon positions, whereas almost all 86 non-coding ORFs locate around the diagonal, indicating that their G + C contents at the second positions are approximate to that at the third codon positions. The need to encode functional proteins exerts severe constrain on the nucleotide composition of genes.[35] Previous work showed a similar nucleotide distribution of functional genes in seven high G + C prokaryotic genomes.[36,37] Therefore, the distinct nucleotide composition between 86 hypothetical genes and the function-known genes draw them away from being genuine genes. Nucleotide compositions for the 915 retained hypothetical genes are shown in Figure 1C. Different from 86 predicted non-coding ORFs, most of the retained hypothetical genes have a similar distribution of GC2 versus GC3 with function-known genes. The COG database has been widely used during the annotation process of sequenced bacterial genomes.[5,38] Belonging to a COG is believed to be a very reliable evidence of protein-coding genes.[38,39] In L. hongkongensis, 954 among 967 function-known genes have been assigned a COG code. However, only 1 of 86 predicted non-coding ORFs has the COG code. Based on the above analyses, these 86 ORFs are very unlikely to encode proteins. COG statistics information for the other nine strains is shown in Table 2. As can been seen, the COG ratio of predicted non-coding ORFs is extremely lower than that of genes with known functions and definite names. Summarily, 7260 among 7426 (97.8%) genes belonging to the first class are assigned with COG codes in the 10 Neisseriaceae genomes. In comparison, only 5 of 418 (1.2%) predicted non-coding ORFs could be assigned to the COG database, indicating that our prediction is much accurate in another sense. These five ORFs with COG codes are likely to constitute falsely predictions of our method because having COG counterparts has been believed to be one of the reliable evidences of encoding proteins. Finally, we only eliminated the remaining 413 hypothetical proteins from the RefSeq annotations in the 10 complete genomes. Details of them are listed in Supplementary Table S1. As is well known, horizontally transferred genes may also have a different nucleotide composition with core genes to some extent. The DarkHorse database stores horizontally transferred genes in sequenced bacterial genomes. Entries in it are all those predicted by comparative genomes methods and hence are very reliable. However, the information of HGT is not available for L. hongkongensis in the DarkHorse. To circumvent this problem, we fall back on the bacterial strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01, which also has a high G + C content, and the distribution of GC2 versus GC3 for function-known genes has shown to be similar to that of L. hongkongensis.[36] Furthermore, as an early sequenced genome, the gene annotation of it is very reliable and so could be used a good reference. For the genome, 22 horizontally transferred genes were extracted from the DarkHorse. As can be seen from Figure 1D, the nucleotide distribution of horizontally transferred genes tends to be similar to that in Figure 1A. Although the DarkHorse genes have basically similar nucleotide compositions with function-known genes, it does not mean the 86 ORFs in Figure 1B are all definitely non-coding. In fact, there may still be the possibility that some of the genes, particularly those with GC2 between 0.3 and 0.6, are falsely predicted as non-coding because of their very recent transfers. To investigate the possibility of clusters of horizontally transferred genes, we checked the chromosomal locations of these 86 ORFs and found that they not have any cluster pattern. Therefore, it is sure that, at least, most of the 85 eliminated ORFs do not belong to horizontally transferred genes and are indeed non-coding. Also note that 11 of the 20 horizontally transferred genes have been assigned the COG code and this ratio is much higher than that of the collective of the 85 eliminated ORFs.

Missed genes found by joint methods and their functions

During the process of annotating sequenced genomes, some genuine genes may be missed because the annotators pursue a balance between the number of all annotated genes and that of finding genuine genes and ensure not too high falsely positive predictions.[14,25,40] The method for picking up missed genes was a two-step process by combining the ab initio gene finding and the blast search. With this method, we found a varying number of missed genes with potential functions (Table 3). For example, eight new genes were added in L. hongkongensis, and details for them are listed in Table 4. RT–PCR analyses validated the transcriptions of all eight sequences (Fig. 2). Out of the 10 newly found genes in the genome of C. violaceum, transcriptions of eight ones are validated with RT–PCR and the exceptions are (Table 6) CV_A0007 and CV_A0010 (Fig. 3). All the amplification with genome DNA was positive (data not shown). Therefore, transcriptional analyses illustrated that the method was effective for picking up new genes and had very high accuracy. However, this method is only applicable to picking up genes having homologues in other genomes but not to strain-specific genes. In the other genomes, the method was directly used and without experimental validation.
Table 3.

Numbers of revised genes, which contains newly found genes, hypothetical genes with newly assigned functions, eliminated ORFs and disrupted ORFs

StrainsNewly found genesNewly assigned functionsEliminated ORFsDisrupted ORFs
C. violaceum10120880
L. hongkongensis820852
N. gonorrhoeae FA 1090184002323
N. gonorrhoeae NCCP119459207560
N. lactamica521888
N. meningitidis 05344262143619
N. meningitidis Alpha 14302142414
N. meningitidis MC58113314827
N. meningitidis Z249182991220
Pseudogulbenkiania146330
Table 4.

Details of the eight newly found genes in the genome of L. hongkongensis

IDPositionCOGCoverage, E-value, IdentityPotential function
LHK_A0001476554–477024 (+)COG0560E92%, 1e−49, 55%Phosphoserine phosphatase
LHK_A0002880771–881358 (+)COG1961L97%, 2e−72, 60%Site-specific recombinases
LHK_A00031391850–1392488 (−)COG2869C98%, 6e−66, 51%Na+-transporting nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
LHK_A00041570970–1571566 (+)COG2864C100%, 1e−110, 81%Thiosulphate reductase cytochrome subunit B
LHK_A00051848723–1850306 (−)COG0733R63%, 3e−156, 73%Na+-dependent transporters of the sodium: neurotransmitter symporter family
LHK_A00062282651–2283334 (+)COG0778C77%, 3e−73, 66%Putative Cob(II)yrinic acid a,c-diamide reductase (BluB)
LHK_A00072660234–2660422 (−)COG0103J96%, 2e−28, 88%Ribosomal protein S9
LHK_A00082875641–2876057 (−)COG0824R91%, 7e−55, 64%Predicted thioesterase
Figure 2.

RT–PCR confirmations of eight newly found genes in L. hongkongensis. mRNAs corresponding to candidate genes were evaluated by RT–PCR (RT). We used no transcriptase-containing sample as negative control (NRT) and PCR with genomic DNA as a positive control (PC).

Table 6.

Details of the 10 newly found genes in the genome of C. violaceum

IDPositionCOGCoverage, E-value, IdentityPotential function
CV_A0001486035–487360 (+)COG0845Q100%, 0, 72%Membrane-fusion protein
CV_A0002487503–489461 (+)COG0750M100%, 0, 71%Membrane-associated Zn-dependent proteases
CV_A00031025430–1025810 (+)COG3536S89%, 4e−67, 83%Uncharacterized bacterial conserved region (BCR)
CV_A00041026544–1027152 (+)COG3165S95%, 6e−88, 66%Uncharacterized BCR
CV_A00051956990–1958684 (+)COG0654HC88%, 3e−177, 53%2-polyprenyl-6-methoxyphenol hydroxylase
CV_A00062305072–2305416 (−)COG3628R99%, 4e−53, 71%Phage baseplate assembly protein
CV_A00072362585–2363220 (−)COG0693R92%, 1e−70, 54%Intracellular protease/amidase
CV_A00084207595–4208386 (+)COG0614P85%, 6e−94, 67%ABC-type cobalamin/Fe3+-siderophores transport systems
CV_A00094462117–4463199 (−)COG0438M96%, 5e−137, 62%Predicted glycosyltransferases
CV_A00104588140–4588436 (−)COG1872S98%, 3e−47, 75%Uncharacterized ancient conserved region
Figure 3.

RT–PCR confirmations of newly found potential genes in C. violaceum.

Numbers of revised genes, which contains newly found genes, hypothetical genes with newly assigned functions, eliminated ORFs and disrupted ORFs Details of the eight newly found genes in the genome of L. hongkongensis RT–PCR confirmations of eight newly found genes in L. hongkongensis. mRNAs corresponding to candidate genes were evaluated by RT–PCR (RT). We used no transcriptase-containing sample as negative control (NRT) and PCR with genomic DNA as a positive control (PC). RT–PCR confirmations of newly found potential genes in C. violaceum. Among the eight new genes in L. hongkongensis, only two do not have any overlapping bases with annotated genes and they are LHK_A0003 and LHK_A0004. The details of the eight genes and their corresponding functions and the details of PCR primers and conditions used in the validation experiments are listed in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. For each of the remaining six overlapping genes, the region spanned by the two PCR primers does not overlap with the annotated genes and thus could reduce false-positive errors for the transcription trace. The six genes are analyzed as follows. LHK_A0001 overlaps the annotated gene LHK_00511. According to the annotation, the two sequences have the same potential function of encoding the phosphoserine phosphatase. LHK_A0001 has the similarity score of the E-value of 10−49 and Identity of 55% and the similarity score of LHK_00511 is the E-value of 10−39 and Identity of 65%. We could not decide which of them is the genuine gene based on the scores. LHK_00511 has the length of only 211 bp, which is much shorter than the length (∼669 bp) of known genes with the same function in other genomes. LHK_A0001 has the length of 471 bp. Based on the length information, LHK_A0001 is more likely to encode the phosphoserine phosphatase than LHK_00511. LHK_A0002 overlaps the annotated gene LHK_00916 with only 29 bp. LHK_A0002 is predicted to code for site-specific recombinase and LHK_00916 encodes replicase. Because they have so little overlap and have different functions, it is very likely that they are both genuine genes. LHK_A0005 has the potential function of encoding the Na+-dependent transporter. LHK_A0006 overlaps 61 bp with one functional gene but they locate on two different DNA strands. LHK_A0007 and the annotated rpsI gene (LHK_02777) constitute an interesting overlap. After the blast alignment, both of them are found to be significantly similar to the rpsI gene in the other genomes. As shown in Figure 4, LHK_A0007 matches the last 141 bp (57 aa) of the other rpsI genes and LHK_02777 matches the first 219 bp (73 aa). LHK_A0007 and LHK_02777 as a whole just constitute a complete rpsI gene (130 aa). In fact, LHK_A0007 and LHK_02777 are adjacent and overlapping. For the overlapping part, LHK_A0007 has the correct reading frame but the LHK_02777 does not have the correct frame, according to the other rpsI genes. Therefore, it is suggested that there has appeared an event of nucleotide insertion/deletion for the rpsI gene in L. hongkongensis. After point mutation, the single reading frame changed to two different ORFs. In this work, the two generated segments could be transcribed and should have functions. But we do not know whether they have the same function of encoding ribosomal protein S9. Finally, LHK_A0008 has possible function of coding for thioesterase.
Table 5.

PCR primers and annealing temperature for the eight newly found genes in L. hongkongensis

IDPrimer pairPrimer sequenceAnnealing temperature
LHK_A0001LPW20036 LPW20037GCATGCCGAATTCCTCGAAG TCCGGGCCTTCTTCCAGTTC60
LHK_A0002LPW20038 LPW20039ACGCGCTTTGATTCGGGAAC GCGTTCGCATAACCGTACAG60
LHK_A0003LPW20046 LPW20047TGGCCAATCCGATCGTGAC CCTCCTGAGCGTTTCAAG55
LHK_A0004LPW19946 LPW19947ATTCATCCGTCGTGGCTAAG TGACCACAAGCAGCCACATC65
LHK_A0005LPW19950 LPW19951TGGGCGCCATGATCACCTAC CGGCAGGCATGGTGATGAAG65
LHK_A0006LPW19952 LPW19953TGGCGCTTCATCCGCATCAC TCCGGCATCAGTACCGAGAC65
LHK_A0007LPW20545 LPW20546CATCACCCGTGCCCTGAT CTTGGAGAACTGCTTGCG60
LHK_A0008LPW20048 LPW20049CTGACACCCGGTGCAGTTTC CTGGCGTAATCCACCCAGAC60
Figure 4.

Matching relationship of aa sequences encoded by LHK_02777 and LHK_A0007 with the RpsI protein in the genome of Pseudogulbenkiania. The plot is adapted from the result generated by the NCBI blast application. In the search, the query is LHK_02777 and LHK_A0007, respectively, whereas the rpsI protein constitutes the subject.

PCR primers and annealing temperature for the eight newly found genes in L. hongkongensis Matching relationship of aa sequences encoded by LHK_02777 and LHK_A0007 with the RpsI protein in the genome of Pseudogulbenkiania. The plot is adapted from the result generated by the NCBI blast application. In the search, the query is LHK_02777 and LHK_A0007, respectively, whereas the rpsI protein constitutes the subject. For the 10 newly found potential genes in C. violaceum, there are not so serious cases of overlapping with annotated genes as in L. hongkongensis. Either the overlapping part is shorter than 15 bp or the overlapping gene is annotated as hypothetical protein that has not significant similarity with known genes in the public database. Details of the 10 genes and their corresponding functions and the details of PCR primers and conditions used in the validation experiments are listed in Tables 6 and 7, respectively. The two negative samples with RT–PCR analysis may constitute falsely positive predictions of our method, or alternatively, they are expressed only in special conditions.
Table 7.

PCR primers and annealing temperature for the 10 newly found potential genes in C. violaceum

IDPrimer pairPrimer sequenceAnnealing temperature
1LPW21817 LPW21818CTGGCATTGACCGATGAC CGAAGCGTTGGGATACAG55
2LPW21819 LPW21820CTGTATCGCCTGGTGTTG GCCCTTGCTCTGCAAATC45
3LPW21821 LPW21822TGCCCATGTCAGGACTTG GAGCTTGTCCAGGTATTG55
4LPW21823 LPW21824GATTTGTCGCGGGTGTTC GAAGCGTTGAACCAGATG60
5LPW21825 LPW21826CATGAGGTTAGCCCTTTC GCCATCGACGAAATACAG55
6LPW21827 LPW21828CAGTGCATCCGCATCATC GCTCCCATTGCCGAATAG60
7LPW21829 LPW21830CAGGAAGACCTGTCTTAC CTGGCAAAGTCCTCTTCC55
8LPW21835 LPW21836CGCAGCTGAAGCAGCTGAAG CGGCTTGAAACCGTTGAG48
9LPW21837 LPW21838TTGAGCTACGGCATAGAC GCCAGCCGTTTCAGATTC55
10LPW21839 LPW21840CGTCTGACGCTGCATGTG GTCGCCGGACAACAATTC55
Details of the 10 newly found genes in the genome of C. violaceum PCR primers and annealing temperature for the 10 newly found potential genes in C. violaceum In the other nine Neisseriaceae strains, there were also newly found genes with potential functions. In N. gonorrhoeae FA 1090, only 1 of 18 newly added genes overlaps the annotated genes and the overlapping part is 20 bp. Among the 18 genes, the function information of four are so detailed to have definite gene names and they encode thiol:disulfide interchange protein DsbD, sulphate ABC transporter permease protein CysU, 23S rRNA (guanosine-2′-O-)-methyltransferase RlmB and septum site-determining protein MinD, respectively. In N. gonorrhoeae NCCP11945, nine new genes are found. Among them, five do not overlap annotated genes. Four of the five genes have putative important function based on very high similarity and they encode transcription antiterminator (Nusg), 30S ribosomal protein S14 (RpsN), 30S ribosomal protein L30 (RpmD) and translation initiation factor IF-1 (InfA). In N. lactamica, none of the five newly added genes overlap annotated genes. Among them, three encode DNA transport competence protein (ComeA), one encodes transposases and one encodes the TonB-dependent receptor. In Pseudogulbenkiania, only one gene is added. Interestingly, this gene has the same 5′ terminal with the annotated gene (NH8B_2210) but they do not have the same stop codon. The NH8B_2210 is much longer than the newly added one and they have the same reading frame. According to the RefSeq annotation for NH8B_2210, the original authors seemed to have predicted that there is a stop codon treated as the selenocystein codon. By blast against the public database, the newly added gene is shown to be a more reliable prediction because it has the same length with counterparts in distantly related species where as the annotated does not. In the four strains of N. meningitidis, from 6 to 30 new genes were added and very few of them overlap the annotated genes. The strain alpha14 N. meningitidis has the most found new genes and interestingly 27 among the 30 new genes encode transposases. Although their aa identities with known transposases in genomes beyond the Neisseria genus tend to be just slightly higher than 50%, the identity is higher than 80% for each of them with counterparts in the same genus. Furthermore, the coverage at each case is greater than 90%. Therefore, predicted functions of encoding transposases for the 27 new genes are reliable. According to the RefSeq annotation, none of the genes code for transposases in this strain. However, 55, 29 and 33 transposases have been annotated in the other three strains of N. meningitidis. The lower sensitivity of the ab initio gene finder used in the annotation of N. meningitidis alpha14 is suggested to be responsible for the missing of transposases. In fact, some of transposases, which aid the integration insertion of genomic islands or single horizontally transferred gene, tend to own abnormal nucleotide composition and are easily missed by composition-based programmes.[41] In addition, some genes with important functions have been added in the N. meningitidis genomes, such as the haemoglobin receptor in 053442, transcription elongation factor (greA) in alpha14, protein methyltransferase (hemK) in Z2491, leucyl aminopeptidase (pepA) and allophanate hydrolase subunit 2 in MC58. Details of the 106 newly found genes in the 10 Neisseriaceae strains are listed in Supplementary Table S2.

Hypothetical proteins with newly assigned functions

For the genomes sequenced several years ago, functional information may be outdated.[16,29] Especially, some hypothetical genes may have functional counterparts in current databases,[16] whereas they are still annotated as hypothetical. This section is aiming to provide functional information for hypothetical genes in the 10 Neisseriaceae strains by using the similarity search method. To ensure reliable function transfer, severe homologous conditions were adopted. After the blast search, varying numbers of hypothetical proteins were assigned functions in the 10 Neisseriaceae genomes (Table 3). Among them, L. hongkongensis and Pseudogulbenkiania have the least numbers perhaps because their genomes were most recently sequenced. In the two strains of the N. gonorrhoeae, the strain FA 1090 has the larger number of assigned functions and it just was sequenced earlier than NCCP11945.[23,42] Among the four strains of the species, N. meningitidis MC58 has the largest number and it just was sequenced earliest among them.[23] Therefore, the number of hypothetical proteins with newly assigned functions may be tightly associated with sequenced time of the genome. In fact, if one genome has been sequenced at earlier year, it should have more functional counterparts in the current public database but not existed at that time.[29] The original annotation would be more outdated for earlier sequenced genome in the sense of function information. Among newly assigned functions, some have been provided definite names (Table 8) and this transferred annotation information should be unquestionable. For example, the hypothetical gene LHK_02863 in L. hongkongensis has been assigned not only the function encoding iron-sulphur cluster assembly protein but also the definite name ‘IscA’. Some other genes were assigned with detailed functions and would be reliable with this function because stringent homologous criteria were adopted. However, there are still some hypothetical proteins with only general functions, such as membrane proteins, lipoproteins and periplasmic proteins (Table 8). This type of rough function information would give help for the determination of more detailed functions. Interestingly, the number of assigned membrane proteins tends to be larger than periplasmic proteins and much larger than lipoproteins in most cases (Table 8). It is suggested that this information corresponds to their natural ranks existing in the genome. Details of assigned functions for each of the 10 Neisseriaceae strains are listed in Supplementary Table S3.
Table 8.

Among hypothetical gene with assigned functions, the numbers of genes with definite names, those encoding membrane proteins, lipoproteins and periplasmic proteins

StrainsWith definite nameMembrane proteinLipoproteinPeriplasmic protein
C. violaceum29511
L. hongkongensis9300
N. gonorrhoeae FA 1090105722531
N. gonorrhoeae NCCP11945342568
N. lactamica3925621
N. meningitidis 0534423021419
N. meningitidis Alpha 1419671626
N. meningitidis MC5847772617
N. meningitidis Z24917833818
Pseudogulbenkiania7950
Among hypothetical gene with assigned functions, the numbers of genes with definite names, those encoding membrane proteins, lipoproteins and periplasmic proteins

Disrupted ORFs

During the process of genome re-annotation for the 10 Neisseriaceae strains, we found an interesting phenomenon. In a specific genome, two adjacent ORFs, which are predicted as genes by the ZCURVE program, have the same function with known genes in the other species. The total length of the two ORFs just corresponds to that of the known counterparts or just a little different from them. Based on similarity scores, both of the two ORFs should be predicted as genes with the corresponding function. However, either of them is much shorter than the functional counterpart and could not constitute a homologue in the sense of length information. Perrodou et al.[43] stated that unrecognized frameshifts, in-frame stop codons and sequencing errors often led to interrupted coding sequences. Very recently, Sharma et al.[44] performed a pilot study on bacterial genes with disrupted ORFs. Their results indicated that many disrupted genes likely utilized the non-standard decoding mechanisms: programmed ribosomal frameshifting and programmed transcriptional realignment. Given that our recognized adjacent ORFs have identical functions, they should originate from the disruption of a longer gene by a frameshift or an in-frame stop codon and rarely by the sequencing error. Numbers of disrupted ORFs are listed in Table 3 and details of them are illustrated in Supplementary Table S4. Totally, 111 disrupted ORFs (or partial genes) were identified in six strains of the genus Neisseria and two in L. hongkongensis. According to Sharma et al.,[44] some of the disrupted ORFs still encode proteins. Consistent with this, both of the disrupted ORFs LHK_A0007 (newly predicted) and LHK_02777 (originally annotated) are found to be transcribed in L. hongkongensis cells by the PCR experiment. Further wet experiment on functions of the other disrupted ORFs would be interesting.

Discussions

The genome annotation would be outdated with the functional information when several years passed since the sequencing. Latest database may contain new functional genes which were not yet assigned functional information when the analyzed genome was sequenced.[29] Those newly added functional information would provide the source of function transfer for some hypothetical genes in the analyzed genome. Sometimes, a few genes missed by the original annotation may be found with the similarity alignment.[25] In this work, a total of 2069 hypothetical genes were assigned with general or detailed functions based on homology search against latest database. Among the 10 Neisseriaceae strains, N. gonorrhoeae FA 1090 and N. meningitidis MC58 and Z2491 were sequenced and annotated earlier.[23] Correspondingly, the numbers of newly assigned functions in them are the largest. Therefore, the time from the sequencing is longer and the function annotation is more likely to be outdated. As for newly found genes, all 10 strains except N. meningitidis alpha14 contain a small number. In fact, it is rather difficult to find genes missed by the original annotation using the similarity-based method. When annotating the genome originally, predicted genes, particularly those having similar counterparts, would be retained as far as possible. Therefore, newly identified genes usually are only those having counterparts newly added in the database. As an exception, as many as 30 genes were newly found in the strain of N. meningitidis alpha14 and 27 of them correspond to transposases. We speculate that the less sensitivity of the ab initio programme, which has been used in the original annotation, for the external genes leads to the missing of the 27 genes associated with insertion function. Besides the published date, the quality of the original annotation is another determining factor of the extent of errors.[33] As an example, N. gonorrhoeae NCCP11945 has the highest gene density according to the RefSeq annotations among the seven Neisseria strains. Correspondingly, the largest number of hypothetical genes has been excluded from this strain. When annotating this genome, only one ab initio gene finder was used.[42] Usually, two or more ab initio programmes are used in annotating the other bacterial genomes. Based on the very abnormal gene density of the strain, we suppose that there may still be non-coding ORFs, besides the 56 ones excluded by us. Besides the annotation method and sequencing time, some other factors also cause the different extent of errors. For example, genes in high G + C bacterial genomes are shown to be difficultly predicted with high accuracy and this is caused by the fact that many long ORFs appear in this type of genomes.[32] In addition, the genome could be difficultly predicted accurately if there are only distantly related species in the public databases.[33] We should note that there still probably are non-coding ORFs and missed genes after the present updated annotation in the 10 Neisseriaceae strains. To assure reliable results, we picked up only those sequences with very higher similarities when identifying missed genes and we used the method with lower specificity when excluding non-coding ORFs. In addition, some thoroughly new genes, which have not significant similarities with any known genes, may be found by combing ab initio programme and wet experimental validation. However, the 106 newly found genes are those having similar counterparts based on latest databases. Also note that different detailed methods may be used to check the annotations of the other bacterial genomes, although the present systematic method has shown to be effective and reliable. For example, the recently developed ab initio gene finder Prodigal,[32] which has lower false positives could replace or jointly used with ZCURVE 1.0. Here, we used only the latter because the use of both of them generates basically consistent results (data not shown). The RPGM program,[39] which is also based on the graphical representation of the DNA sequence, could be chosen as an alternative to eliminate non-coding ORFs.

Supplementary data

Supplementary Data are available at www.dnaresearch.oxfordjournals.org.

Funding

This work was supported by the Hong Kong Scholars Program (XJ2011005), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31071109) and the programme for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-11-0059).
  43 in total

1.  Using the COG database to improve gene recognition in complete genomes.

Authors:  D A Natale; M Y Galperin; R L Tatusov; E V Koonin
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Laribacter hongkongensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel gram-negative bacterium isolated from a cirrhotic patient with bacteremia and empyema.

Authors:  K Y Yuen; P C Woo; J L Teng; K W Leung; M K Wong; S K Lau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  ZCURVE: a new system for recognizing protein-coding genes in bacterial and archaeal genomes.

Authors:  Feng-Biao Guo; Hong-Yu Ou; Chun-Ting Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Complete genomic sequence of the Amsacta moorei entomopoxvirus: analysis and comparison with other poxviruses.

Authors:  A L Bawden; K J Glassberg; J Diggans; R Shaw; W Farmerie; R W Moyer
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 3.616

5.  Seven GC-rich microbial genomes adopt similar codon usage patterns regardless of their phylogenetic lineages.

Authors:  Ling-Ling Chen; Chun-Ting Zhang
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2003-06-20       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Complete genome sequence of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B strain MC58.

Authors:  H Tettelin; N J Saunders; J Heidelberg; A C Jeffries; K E Nelson; J A Eisen; K A Ketchum; D W Hood; J F Peden; R J Dodson; W C Nelson; M L Gwinn; R DeBoy; J D Peterson; E K Hickey; D H Haft; S L Salzberg; O White; R D Fleischmann; B A Dougherty; T Mason; A Ciecko; D S Parksey; E Blair; H Cittone; E B Clark; M D Cotton; T R Utterback; H Khouri; H Qin; J Vamathevan; J Gill; V Scarlato; V Masignani; M Pizza; G Grandi; L Sun; H O Smith; C M Fraser; E R Moxon; R Rappuoli; J C Venter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Identification of protein-coding genes in the genome of Vibrio cholerae with more than 98% accuracy using occurrence frequencies of single nucleotides.

Authors:  J Wang; C T Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  2001-08

Review 8.  The past, present and future of genome-wide re-annotation.

Authors:  Christos A Ouzounis; Peter D Karp
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  The automatic annotation of bacterial genomes.

Authors:  Emily J Richardson; Mick Watson
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 11.622

10.  Towards understanding the first genome sequence of a crenarchaeon by genome annotation using clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COGs).

Authors:  D A Natale; U T Shankavaram; M Y Galperin; Y I Wolf; L Aravind; E V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2000-11-06       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  7 in total

1.  Reannotation of Yersinia pestis Strain 91001 Based on Omics Data.

Authors:  Yiqing Mao; Xianwei Yang; Yang Liu; Yanfeng Yan; Zongmin Du; Yanping Han; Yajun Song; Lei Zhou; Yujun Cui; Ruifu Yang
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  High Prevalence and Mechanism Associated With Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Positive Phenotype in Laribacter hongkongensis.

Authors:  Jade L L Teng; Ruibang Luo; Bone S F Tang; Jordan Y H Fong; Li Wang; Lilong Jia; Chloe K S Wong; Elaine Chan; Amy W S Leung; Gilman K H Siu; Tsz-Ho Chiu; Ami M Y Fung; Alan K L Wu; Man-Lung Yeung; Susanna K P Lau; Patrick C Y Woo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  A Transcriptome Map of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae at Single-Nucleotide Resolution Using Deep RNA-Seq.

Authors:  Zhipeng Su; Jiawen Zhu; Zhuofei Xu; Ran Xiao; Rui Zhou; Lu Li; Huanchun Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Investigating Potential Chromosomal Rearrangements during Laboratory Culture of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Russell Spencer-Smith; Simon W Gould; Madhuri Pulijala; Lori A S Snyder
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2018-01-20

5.  NGS read classification using AI.

Authors:  Benjamin Voigt; Oliver Fischer; Christian Krumnow; Christian Herta; Piotr Wojciech Dabrowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Recognition of Protein-coding Genes Based on Z-curve Algorithms.

Authors:  Feng -Biao Guo; Yan Lin; Ling -Ling Chen
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.236

7.  Genomic repeats, misassembly and reannotation: a case study with long-read resequencing of Porphyromonas gingivalis reference strains.

Authors:  Luis Acuña-Amador; Aline Primot; Edouard Cadieu; Alain Roulet; Frédérique Barloy-Hubler
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.