Literature DB >> 2357040

The importance of surveillance after discharge from hospital in the diagnosis of postoperative wound infection.

D J Law1, S F Mishriki, P J Jeffery.   

Abstract

A prospective survey was carried out in West Dorset to determine the incidence of postoperative wound infection. A total of 1242 patients were included in the survey (1086 inpatients and 156 day cases). The overall infection rate was 6.7%. Although the incidence of infection was consistent with that reported by other studies, the infection rate in the 'clean' surgical category was higher than in most other published reports. Careful surveillance after discharge from hospital may have been responsible for identifying cases of wound infection which otherwise might not have come to the attention of the study. Of patients whose wounds became infected, 34 (41%) cases were diagnosed in hospital and 49 (59%) cases were diagnosed in the community. Failure to pursue patients after discharge would have resulted in a substantial underestimation of the true wound infection rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2357040      PMCID: PMC2499172     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  10 in total

Review 1.  Factors affecting the development of surgical wound infections: a surgeon's view.

Authors:  T E Bucknall
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Surgical sepsis at a district general hospital.

Authors:  N R Hulton; E S Kiff; T D Brogan
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  An eight year study of postoperative wound infection in two district general hospitals.

Authors:  D A Leigh
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds.

Authors:  P J Cruse; R Foord
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Postoperative wound infection rates: results of prospective statewide surveillance.

Authors:  B F Farber; R P Wenzel
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Effect of methods of postdischarge wound infection surveillance on reported infection rates.

Authors:  L L Rosendorf; J Octavio; J P Estes
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.918

7.  Prophylactic metronidazole in appendicectomy: a controlled trial.

Authors:  T Bates; V L Touquet; M K Tutton; S E Mahmoud; J W Reuther
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Risk factors for infection at the operative site after abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  M Shapiro; A Muñoz; I B Tager; S C Schoenbaum; B F Polk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Randomised clinical trial of perioperative cefazolin in preventing infection after hysterectomy.

Authors:  B F Polk; I B Tager; M Shapiro; B Goren-White; P Goldstein; S C Schoenbaum
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  A study of some factors associated with wound infection.

Authors:  M J Abussaud; M M Meqdem
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.926

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  Surgical site surveillance: Quality improvement or waste of time?

Authors:  J M Bohnen
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1994-11

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomics of antibacterial treatment.

Authors:  P G Davey; M M Malek; S E Parker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Elective inguinal hernia repair with mesh: is there a need for antibiotic prophylaxis?--A review.

Authors:  Seema Biswas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Proposed definitions for the audit of postoperative infection: a discussion paper. Surgical Infection Study Group.

Authors:  A L Peel; E W Taylor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Using cost of infection as a tool to demonstrate a difference in prophylactic antibiotic efficacy: a prospective randomized comparison of the pharmacoeconomic effectiveness of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime prophylaxis in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  John C Woodfield; Andre M Van Rij; Ross A Pettigrew; Antje van der Linden; Donna Bolt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Costing wound infection in a Scottish hospital.

Authors:  W Lynch; M Malek; P G Davey; D J Byrne; A Napier
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Incidence of hospital-acquired infection and length of hospital stay.

Authors:  B H Tess; H M Glenister; L C Rodrigues; M B Wagner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Effect of single-dose prophylactic ampicillin and sulbactam on wound infection after tension-free inguinal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh: the randomized, double-blind, prospective trial.

Authors:  M A Yerdel; E B Akin; S Dolalan; A G Turkcapar; M Pehlivan; I E Gecim; E Kuterdem
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Need to measure outcome after discharge in surgical audit.

Authors:  R H Hardwick; A Saltrese-Taylor; C D Collins
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-09

10.  [Pathophysiology of posttraumatic osteitis].

Authors:  T Kälicke; F Kutscha-Lissberg; T M Frangen; G Muhr; S Arens
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.