Literature DB >> 22346507

Surgical site surveillance: Quality improvement or waste of time?

J M Bohnen1.   

Abstract

Year:  1994        PMID： 22346507      PMCID： PMC3250861          DOI： 10.1155/1994/261095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Infect Dis        ISSN： 1180-2332


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Wound infection surveillance.

Authors:  J T Lee
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.982

2.  The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection.

Authors:  D C Classen; R S Evans; S L Pestotnik; S D Horn; R L Menlove; J P Burke
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The importance of surveillance after discharge from hospital in the diagnosis of postoperative wound infection.

Authors:  D J Law; S F Mishriki; P J Jeffery
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Continuous, 10-year wound infection surveillance. Results, advantages, and unanswered questions.

Authors:  M M Olson; J T Lee
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1990-06

5.  Surgical wound infections. A 5-year prospective study of 20,193 wounds at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center.

Authors:  M Olson; M O'Connor; M L Schwartz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 12.969
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.