Literature DB >> 23569693

Impact of alternative coding schemes on incidence rates of key complications after total hip arthroplasty: a risk-adjusted analysis of a national data set.

Peter Cram1, Said A Ibrahim, Xin Lu, Brian R Wolf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Administrative data are commonly used to examine orthopedic outcomes including total hip arthroplasty (THA), but little is known about how minor analytic decisions impact results. Our objective was to examine how the rates of 3 adverse outcomes (deep vein thrombosis [DVT], pulmonary embolism [PE], and hemorrhage) varied with subtle adjustments to our analytic method.
METHODS: We used Medicare Part A data to identify all beneficiaries who underwent primary or revision THA during 2007 to 2008. We used 2 published algorithms (Katz/Cram and Patient Safety Indicators [PSIs]) to identify cases of DVT, PE, and hemorrhage occurring at 3 different points in time; index admission; 30-day readmission; and index admission plus readmission. We used the kappa statistic to compare the agreement between methods. We examined variation in complication rates across hospitals using regression models that adjusted for differences in patient demographics and comorbidity.
RESULTS: Among 202 773 primary and 40 973 revision THA patients, the agreement between the Katz/Cram and PSI methods was excellent for DVT and PE at all time points (kappa 0.95-1.0) but poor for hemorrhage (kappa 0.07-0.29). The incidence of DVT during the index admission among the primary THA cohort was 0.40% using the Katz/Cram method and 0.37% using the PSI method. The incidence of hemorrhage during the index admission among the primary THA cohort was 1.29% using the Katz/Cram method and 0.05% using the PSI method. We found significant variation in hospital rates of all 3 complications (DVT, PE, and hemorrhage). For example, the mean rate of hemorrhage at index admission or readmission for revision THA was 5.7% (standard deviation: 12.8%); we found 137 hospitals with hemorrhage rates of 25% or higher among their revision THA patients. DISCUSSION: We found important differences in the rates of THA complications depending upon the coding algorithms and time frame employed. Our results suggest that administrative data can be used to evaluate THA complications but that methodology should be carefully considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare; administrative data; hip arthroplasty; outcomes; quality of care

Year:  2012        PMID: 23569693      PMCID: PMC3617903          DOI: 10.1177/2151458511435723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil        ISSN: 2151-4585


  44 in total

1.  Clinical versus administrative data bases for CABG surgery. Does it matter?

Authors:  E L Hannan; H Kilburn; M L Lindsey; R Lewis
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  A method for screening the quality of hospital care using administrative data: preliminary validation results.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; S M Foley; T Heeren; J Daley; C C Duncan; E S Fisher; J Hughes
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1992-11

3.  Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate?

Authors:  Morley A Herbert; Syma L Prince; Janet L Williams; Mitchell J Magee; Michael J Mack
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Validating billing data for RBC transfusions: a brief report.

Authors:  J B Segal; P M Ness; N R Powe
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States medicare population.

Authors:  J N Katz; E Losina; J Barrett; C B Phillips; N N Mahomed; R A Lew; E Guadagnoli; W H Harris; R Poss; J A Baron
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Preoperative risks and outcomes of hip and knee arthroplasty in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Frances Weaver; Denise Hynes; William Hopkinson; Richard Wixson; Shukri Khuri; Jennifer Daley; William G Henderson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Early failures of total hip replacement: effect of surgeon volume.

Authors:  Elena Losina; Jane Barrett; Nizar N Mahomed; John A Baron; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-04

9.  Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and the outcomes of total knee replacement.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Jane Barrett; Nizar N Mahomed; John A Baron; R John Wright; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Variation in postoperative complication rates after high-risk surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Peter J Pronovost; John A Cowan; Pamela A Lipsett; James C Stanley; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  9 in total

1.  Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991-2010.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Xin Lu; Stephen L Kates; Jasvinder A Singh; Yue Li; Brian R Wolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The effect of resident participation on short-term outcomes after orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew J Pugely; Yubo Gao; Christopher T Martin; John J Callagh; Stuart L Weinstein; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Bundled Payments for Elective Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Medicare Administrative Data.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Xin Lu; Yue Li
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2015-03

4.  Comorbidities in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: do they influence hospital costs and length of stay?

Authors:  Andrew J Pugely; Christopher T Martin; Yubo Gao; Daniel A Belatti; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Use of present-on-admission indicators for complications after total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of Medicare administrative data.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Kevin J Bozic; John J Callaghan; Xin Lu; Yue Li
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Surgical Outcomes in Canada and the United States: An Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Clinical Registry.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Mark E Cohen; Clifford Ko; Bruce E Landon; Bruce Hall; Timothy D Jackson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Is the readmission rate a valid quality indicator? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Claudia Fischer; Hester F Lingsma; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Dionne S Kringos; Niek S Klazinga; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  International comparison of variation in performance between hospitals for THA and TKA: Is it even possible? A systematic review including 33 studies and 8 arthroplasty register reports.

Authors:  Peter van Schie; Shaho Hasan; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Jan W Schoones; Rob G H H Nelissen; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-04-21

9.  The Effect of Advancing Age on Total Joint Replacement Outcomes.

Authors:  Michele Fang; Nicolas Noiseux; Eric Linson; Peter Cram
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2015-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.