Literature DB >> 14700392

The use of multiple cues in mate choice.

Ulrika Candolin1.   

Abstract

An increasing number of studies find females to base their mate choice on several cues. Why this occurs is debated and many different hypotheses have been proposed. Here I review the hypotheses and the evidence in favour of them. At the same time I provide a new categorisation based on the adaptiveness of the preferences and the information content of the cues. A few comparative and empirical studies suggest that most multiple cues are Fisherian attractiveness cues or uninformative cues that occur alongside a viability indicator and facilitate detection, improve signal reception, or are remnants from past selection pressures. However, much evidence exists tor multiple cues providing additional information and serving as multiple messages that either indicate general mate quality or enable females that differ in mate preferences to choose the most suitable male. Less evidence exists for multiple cues serving as back-up signals. The importance of receiver psychology, multiple sensory environments and signal interaction in the evolution of multiple cues and preferences has received surprisingly little attention but may be of crucial importance. Similarly, sexual conflict has been proposed to result in maladaptive preferences for manipulative cues, and in neutral preferences for threshold cues, but no reliable evidence exists so far. An important factor in the evolution of multiple preferences is the cost of using additional cues. Most theoretical work assumes that the cost of choice increases with the number of cues used, which restricts the conditions under which preferences for multiple cues are expected to evolve. I suggest that in contrast to this expectation, the use of multiple cues can reduce mate choice costs by decreasing the number of mates inspected more closely or the time and energy spent inspecting a set of mates. This may be one explanation for why multiple cues are more common than usually expected. Finally I discuss the consequences that the use of multiple cues may have for the process of sexual selection, the maintenance of genetic variation, and speciation.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14700392     DOI: 10.1017/s1464793103006158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  201 in total

1.  Contextual chemosensory urine signaling in an African cichlid fish.

Authors:  Karen P Maruska; Russell D Fernald
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Bill color, not badge size, indicates testosterone-related information in house sparrows.

Authors:  Silke Laucht; Bart Kempenaers; James Dale
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Nutritional correlates and mate acquisition role of multiple sexual traits in male collared flycatchers.

Authors:  Gergely Hegyi; Eszter Szöllosi; Susanne Jenni-Eiermann; János Török; Marcel Eens; László Zsolt Garamszegi
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-05-02

4.  Phonotaxis to male's calls embedded within a chorus by female gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor.

Authors:  Kevin Christie; Johannes Schul; Albert S Feng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Flowers help bees cope with uncertainty: signal detection and the function of floral complexity.

Authors:  Anne S Leonard; Anna Dornhaus; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 6.  Defining individual quality over lifetimes and selective contexts.

Authors:  Simon P Lailvaux; Michael M Kasumovic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Multimodal signalling in the North American barn swallow: a phenotype network approach.

Authors:  Matthew R Wilkins; Daizaburo Shizuka; Maxwell B Joseph; Joanna K Hubbard; Rebecca J Safran
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Sensory modalities in cichlid fish behavior.

Authors:  Daniel Escobar-Camacho; Karen L Carleton
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2015-12-01

9.  Sexual selection drives the evolution of male wing interference patterns.

Authors:  M F Hawkes; E Duffy; R Joag; A Skeats; J Radwan; N Wedell; M D Sharma; D J Hosken; J Troscianko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Oxytocin and vasopressin neural networks: Implications for social behavioral diversity and translational neuroscience.

Authors:  Zachary V Johnson; Larry J Young
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.