Literature DB >> 2356826

State health department response to disease cluster reports: a protocol for investigation.

B J Fiore1, L P Hanrahan, H A Anderson.   

Abstract

State health departments are increasingly faced with the task of responding to reports of apparent cancer and other disease clusters. Since 1979, 141 requests for investigation have been received by the Wisconsin Division of Health, with over 60% of these requests occurring since 1985. Mounting public concern and limited resources have resulted in the development of a "disease cluster investigation and analysis protocol." Protocol steps include: 1) circumscribing the cluster; 2) ascertaining cases; 3) assessing risk of the exposed versus a referent population; 4) statistically analyzing disease rates; 5) examining potential exposure; 6) assessing biologic plausibility; 7) determining cluster significance and need for further investigation; and 8) reporting results. To demonstrate the protocol, the authors present a case example of an investigation of an apparent cancer cluster. Since 1979, 62 reports were resolved with initial contact with informant education (step 1), 61 reports required descriptive analysis (steps 1-8) with no site visit, and 18 reports required site visits. None of the reports required further in-depth epidemiologic investigation. This protocol provides a systematic approach to investigation and analysis, prioritizes the need for more in-depth study, and, when necessary, assuages community concerns when a disease cluster is reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2356826     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  8 in total

Review 1.  Investigation of clusters of adverse reproductive outcomes, an overview.

Authors:  P De Wals
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Public requests for cancer cluster investigations: a survey of state health departments.

Authors:  C W Trumbo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Answering cluster investigation requests: the value of simple simulations and statistical tools.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bellec; Denis Hémon; Jacqueline Clavel
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Adequacy of state capacity to address noncommunicable disease clusters in the era of environmental public health tracking.

Authors:  Nadia Shalauta Juzych; Beth Resnick; Robin Streeter; Julie Herbstman; Joanna Zablotsky; Mary Fox; Thomas A Burke
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Investigation of a cluster of ten cases of Hodgkin's disease in an occupational setting.

Authors:  G M Swaen; J M Slangen; M G Ott; E Kusters; G Van Den Langenbergh; J W Arends; A Zober
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 6.  Cancer clusters in the USA: what do the last twenty years of state and federal investigations tell us?

Authors:  Michael Goodman; Joshua S Naiman; Dina Goodman; Judy S LaKind
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 5.635

7.  Bayesian versus frequentist statistical inference for investigating a one-off cancer cluster reported to a health department.

Authors:  Michael D Coory; Rachael A Wills; Adrian G Barnett
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Wisconsin's environmental public health tracking network: information systems design for childhood cancer surveillance.

Authors:  Lawrence P Hanrahan; Henry A Anderson; Brian Busby; Marni Bekkedal; Thomas Sieger; Laura Stephenson; Lynda Knobeloch; Mark Werner; Pamela Imm; Joseph Olson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.