INTRODUCTION: As CT screening is integrated into non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) care, additional parameters are needed to help distinguish cancers from benign nodules. Osteopontin (OPN), a secreted phosphoprotein, has elevated plasma levels in NSCLC. We hypothesize that changes in plasma OPN over time (i.e., OPN velocity [OPNV]) can differentiate NSCLC patients from those without cancer in a CT screening population. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted within a NSCLC CT screening trial. Incident cancers with serial plasma were matched to controls. OPN was measured by ELISA. Demographic, OPN, and OPNV were compared between cancers and controls using Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests. RESULTS: Ten incident cancers were identified. The pack years distributions were similar, but cancers were older (median of the paired difference: 5.35 years; p=0.002) and their surveillance intervals were shorter (median of the paired difference: -2 months; p=0. 03) than matched controls. Baseline OPN was similar (median of the paired difference: -5.15 ng/ml, p=0.50), but OPNV in the cancers was significantly greater than that of matched controls, (median of the paired difference: 1.06 ng/ml/month, p=0.01). Accuracy rate for prediction of disease status based on OPNV (adjusted for age and surveillance) was 83%. CONCLUSIONS: These are early evidence for utility of monitoring plasma OPN during CT screening to assist in identification of NSCLCs.
INTRODUCTION: As CT screening is integrated into non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) care, additional parameters are needed to help distinguish cancers from benign nodules. Osteopontin (OPN), a secreted phosphoprotein, has elevated plasma levels in NSCLC. We hypothesize that changes in plasma OPN over time (i.e., OPN velocity [OPNV]) can differentiate NSCLCpatients from those without cancer in a CT screening population. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted within a NSCLC CT screening trial. Incident cancers with serial plasma were matched to controls. OPN was measured by ELISA. Demographic, OPN, and OPNV were compared between cancers and controls using Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests. RESULTS: Ten incident cancers were identified. The pack years distributions were similar, but cancers were older (median of the paired difference: 5.35 years; p=0.002) and their surveillance intervals were shorter (median of the paired difference: -2 months; p=0. 03) than matched controls. Baseline OPN was similar (median of the paired difference: -5.15 ng/ml, p=0.50), but OPNV in the cancers was significantly greater than that of matched controls, (median of the paired difference: 1.06 ng/ml/month, p=0.01). Accuracy rate for prediction of disease status based on OPNV (adjusted for age and surveillance) was 83%. CONCLUSIONS: These are early evidence for utility of monitoring plasma OPN during CT screening to assist in identification of NSCLCs.
Authors: Heber MacMahon; John H M Austin; Gordon Gamsu; Christian J Herold; James R Jett; David P Naidich; Edward F Patz; Stephen J Swensen Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Johan M Lorenzen; Nils Nickel; Robert Krämer; Heiko Golpon; Volker Westerkamp; Karen M Olsson; Hermann Haller; Marius M Hoeper Journal: Chest Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Antonio Berenguer; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Bert G Blijenberg; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Justin D Blasberg; Harvey I Pass; Chandra M Goparaju; Raja M Flores; Suzie Lee; Jessica S Donington Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Quynh-Thu Le; Eunice Chen; Ali Salim; Hongbin Cao; Christina S Kong; Richard Whyte; Jessica Donington; Walter Cannon; Heather Wakelee; Robert Tibshirani; John D Mitchell; Donna Richardson; Ken J O'Byrne; Albert C Koong; Amato J Giaccia Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-03-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Akeila Bellahcène; Vincent Castronovo; Kalu U E Ogbureke; Larry W Fisher; Neal S Fedarko Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Philip C Mack; Mary W Redman; Kari Chansky; Stephen K Williamson; Nichole C Farneth; Primo N Lara; Wilbur A Franklin; Quynh-Thu Le; John J Crowley; David R Gandara Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-09-08 Impact factor: 44.544