Literature DB >> 17085120

Comparison of methods for calculating prostate specific antigen velocity.

Xiaoying Yu1, Misop Han, Stacy Loeb, Sara N Gashti, Joannie T Yeh, Kimberly A Roehl, William J Catalona.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prostate specific antigen velocity is frequently calculated using regression analysis of multiple prostate specific antigen measurements during an interval of 18 to 24 months. It has been reported that the prostate specific antigen velocity in the year before prostate cancer diagnosis is associated with the cancer specific mortality rate following radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy. There are limited data comparing alternate methods of calculating prostate specific antigen velocity. In this study we compared simple arithmetic prostate specific antigen velocity calculations to the more complicated regression analysis using prostate specific antigen measurements from varying intervals to determine whether the methods were interchangeable.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2003 to 2005 a total of 540 men underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Preoperative prostate specific antigen velocity was calculated using arithmetic and linear regression methods during 12 and 18-month intervals. The correlation, mean and median prostate specific antigen velocity were compared among methods.
RESULTS: Prostate specific antigen velocity calculations using simple arithmetic and linear regression had a strong correlation when restricted to prostate specific antigen values from 12 months before diagnosis (r = 0.92). When prostate specific antigen measurements beyond 1 year were included in the calculation, prostate specific antigen velocity was significantly lower than in the 12 months before cancer diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a simple arithmetic prostate specific antigen velocity calculation yields results comparable to those of the more complicated regression analysis when restricted to prostate specific antigen values from within the year before diagnosis in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. In this manner arithmetic prostate specific antigen velocity calculations may be used in daily clinical practice to help predict the outcome following definitive therapy. Prostate specific antigen velocity is significantly lower when calculated during a longer interval before prostate cancer diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17085120     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

1.  An examination of the dynamic changes in prostate-specific antigen occurring in a population-based cohort of men over time.

Authors:  Brant A Inman; Jingyu Zhang; Nilay D Shah; Brian T Denton
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Interpretation of the prostate-specific antigen history in assessing life-threatening prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna E Kettermann; Luigi Ferrucci; Bruce J Trock; E Jeffrey Metter; Stacy Loeb; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  The use of prostate-specific antigen kinetics to stratify risk in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Joseph Presti
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Sixteen-year longitudinal changes in serum prostate-specific antigen levels: the olmsted county study.

Authors:  Steven J Jacobsen; Debra J Jacobson; Michaela E McGree; Jennifer L St Sauver; George G Klee; Cynthia J Girman; Michael M Lieber
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity and doubling time are associated with outcome but neither improves prediction of outcome beyond pretreatment PSA alone in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew Frank O'Brien; Angel M Cronin; Paul A Fearn; Brandon Smith; Jason Stasi; Bertrand Guillonneau; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Plasma osteopontin velocity differentiates lung cancers from controls in a CT screening population.

Authors:  Sasha Joseph; Ryan Harrington; Dawn Walter; Judith D Goldberg; Xiaochun Li; Amanda Beck; Tyler Litton; Nathalie Hirsch; Justin Blasberg; Mark Slomiany; William Rom; Harvey Pass; Jessica Donington
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.388

7.  Current strategies for monitoring men with localised prostate cancer lack a strong evidence base: observational longitudinal study.

Authors:  C Metcalfe; K Tilling; M Davis; J A Lane; R M Martin; H Kynaston; P Powell; D E Neal; F Hamdy; J L Donovan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Artificial neural network (ANN) velocity better identifies benign prostatic hyperplasia but not prostate cancer compared with PSA velocity.

Authors:  Carsten Stephan; Nicola Büker; Henning Cammann; Hellmuth-Alexander Meyer; Michael Lein; Klaus Jung
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 2.264

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.