Máirtín S McDermott1, Alison E While. 1. Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK. mairtin.mcdermott@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of using computers to deliver patient self-management programs (PSMPs) to patients with chronic illness in health supported settings. METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), where the experimental intervention was compared either with an equivalent 'standard' PSMP delivered by staff, usual care or no intervention and reported data either on clinical or behavioral outcomes. We conducted a narrative synthesis, incorporating a small quantitative analysis to enable comparisons across studies. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether computer-based PSMPs were superior to standard programs. However, it appeared that these interventions were effective when compared to no intervention. Interventions incorporating behavior change techniques beyond the provision of information appeared more effective than those that did not. CONCLUSION: Evidence from the current review, whilst limited, suggests that computer-based PSMPs, delivered in health-supported settings, show potential for changing health behaviors and improving clinical outcomes in patients with chronic illness. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Although the approach shows promise, it is premature to recommend the integration of these interventions into clinical practice. However, more well designed trials are warranted to test their efficacy and cost-benefit.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of using computers to deliver patient self-management programs (PSMPs) to patients with chronic illness in health supported settings. METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), where the experimental intervention was compared either with an equivalent 'standard' PSMP delivered by staff, usual care or no intervention and reported data either on clinical or behavioral outcomes. We conducted a narrative synthesis, incorporating a small quantitative analysis to enable comparisons across studies. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether computer-based PSMPs were superior to standard programs. However, it appeared that these interventions were effective when compared to no intervention. Interventions incorporating behavior change techniques beyond the provision of information appeared more effective than those that did not. CONCLUSION: Evidence from the current review, whilst limited, suggests that computer-based PSMPs, delivered in health-supported settings, show potential for changing health behaviors and improving clinical outcomes in patients with chronic illness. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Although the approach shows promise, it is premature to recommend the integration of these interventions into clinical practice. However, more well designed trials are warranted to test their efficacy and cost-benefit.
Authors: Michael A Diefenbach; Catherine Benedict; Suzanne M Miller; Annette L Stanton; Mary E Ropka; Kuang-Yi Wen; Linda G Fleisher; Nihal E Mohamed; Simon J Hall Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Denalee M O'Malley; Stacy N Davis; Katie A Devine; Brittany Sullivan; Alicja Bator; Lynn Clemow; Jeanne M Ferrante; Patricia A Findley; Suzanne M Miller; Shawna V Hudson Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Åsa Revenäs; Christina H Opava; Cathrin Martin; Ingrid Demmelmaier; Christina Keller; Pernilla Åsenlöf Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2015-02-09
Authors: Christine Rini; Laura S Porter; Tamara J Somers; Daphne C McKee; Francis J Keefe Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Deborah Morrison; Sally Wyke; Karolina Agur; Euan J Cameron; Robert I Docking; Alison M Mackenzie; Alex McConnachie; Vandana Raghuvir; Neil C Thomson; Frances S Mair Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Tian Renton; Herman Tang; Naomi Ennis; Michael D Cusimano; Shree Bhalerao; Tom A Schweizer; Jane Topolovec-Vranic Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 5.428