| Literature DB >> 23566290 |
Christopher Naugler1, Jianguo Zhang, Dan Henne, Paul Woods, Brenda R Hemmelgarn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are a global health problem with northern countries such as Canada at particular risk. A number of sociodemographic factors have been reported to be associated with low vitamin D levels but prior studies have been limited by the ability of the researchers to gather this data directly from clinical trial participants. The purpose of this study was to use a novel methodology of inferring sociodemographic variables to evaluate the correlates of vitamin D levels in individuals dwelling in the City of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23566290 PMCID: PMC3637075 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Median 25 hydroxyvitamin D level for the Calgary population studied, and the proportion of the population below levels representing the Institute Of Medicine’s[31]categories of vitamin adequacy: deficiency (<30 nmol/L), estimated average requirement (40 nmol/L) and recommended dietary allowance (50 nmol/L)
| 65 | 71 | |
| 0.10 | 0.07 | |
| 0.19 | 0.15 | |
| 0.30 | 0.24 |
Data summary of the individual- and census dissemination area-level variables included in the analysis, stratified by the presence of vitamin D insufficiency
| Mean (SD) | 47.7 (14.4) | 53.6 (15.4) | 52.1 (15.4) | |
| Female | 24262 (58.6) | 78417 (67.1) | 102679 (64.9) | |
| January | 4084 (9.9) | 10615 (9.1) | 14699 (9.3) | |
| Feburary | 4210 (10.2) | 10996 (9.4) | 15206 (9.6) | |
| March | 6025 (14.6) | 12657 (10.8) | 18682 (11.8) | |
| April | 4371 (10.6) | 11153 (9.5) | 15524 (9.8) | |
| May | 3999 (9.7) | 12245 (10.5) | 16244 (10.3) | |
| June | 4345 (10.5) | 12409 (10.6) | 16754 (10.6) | |
| July | 2939 (7.1) | 10736 (9.2) | 13675 (8.6) | |
| August | 2863 (6.9) | 10912 (9.3) | 13775 (8.7) | |
| September | 2015 (4.9) | 6723 (5.7) | 8738 (5.5) | |
| October | 2265 (5.5) | 6745 (5.8) | 9010 (5.7) | |
| November | 2277 (5.5) | 6618 (5.7) | 8895 (5.6) | |
| December | 2008 (4.9) | 5117 (4.4) | 7125 (4.5) | |
| Median (IQR1) | 70690 (52623–87577) | 73831 (55649–96393) | 73264 (54982–94482) | |
| Median (IQR) | 25.6 (17.3-37.1) | 21.0 (14.1-29.9) | 22.3 (14.8-31.9) | |
| Median (IQR) | 1.7 (0.0 - 3.4) | 1.6 (0.0 - 3.0) | 1.6 (0.0 - 3.1) | |
| Median (IQR) | 49.0 (35.9-62.6) | 56.9 (43.9-67.9) | 55.7 (41.1 - 66.7) | |
1 IQR=interquartile range.
Figure 1Mean vitamin D levels in Calgary Alberta. Map of the city of Calgary showing mean vitamin D levels (nmol/L) by census dissemination area (1986 areas with a total of 158,327 individuals).
Figure 2Baseline sociodemographic variables for the city of Calgary. Variables given by census dissemination area (data from the 2006 Canada Census).
Estimates from the population-averaged GEE model investigating associations with vitamin D level
| 64.5883 | 2.4201 | <.0001 | <.0001 | |
| | | | <.0001 | |
| age_RCS_lin | −0.2738 | 0.0422 | <.0001 | |
| age_RCS_S1 | 0.0015 | 0.0001 | <.0001 | |
| age_RCS_S2 | −0.0030 | 0.0004 | <.0001 | |
| age_RCS_S3 | 0.0008 | 0.0004 | 0.0823 | |
| | | | <.0001 | |
| income_RCS_lin | −0.4078 | 0.2350 | 0.0826 | |
| income_RCS_S1 | 0.0543 | 0.0263 | 0.0392 | |
| income_RCS_S2 | −0.1270 | 0.0793 | 0.1092 | |
| income_RCS_S3 | 0.0824 | 0.0855 | 0.3352 | |
| | | | <.0001 | |
| percentimmi__RCS_lin | −7.6190 | 9.4844 | 0.4218 | |
| percentimmi__RCS_S1 | −172.823 | 567.4589 | 0.7607 | |
| percentimmi__RCS_S2 | −1122.79 | 1547.330 | 0.4681 | |
| percentimmi__RCS_S3 | 3152.879 | 1511.398 | 0.0370 | |
| | | | <.0001 | |
| percentabor__RCS_lin | −68.5534 | 15.3580 | <.0001 | |
| percentabor__RCS_S1 | 13868.36 | 5311.648 | 0.0090 | |
| | | | <.0001 | |
| percentuniv_RCS_lin | 13.6596 | 4.2690 | 0.0014 | |
| percentuniv_RCS_S1 | 237.8126 | 69.0070 | 0.0006 | |
| percentuniv_RCS_S2 | −842.990 | 263.7487 | 0.0014 | |
| percentuniv_RCS_S3 | 1090.294 | 509.4453 | 0.0323 | |
| | | | <.0001 | |
| Female | 7.4674 | 0.1930 | <.0001 | |
| Male | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | . | |
| | | | <.0001 | |
| December | −1.3870 | 0.5024 | 0.0058 | |
| November | 0.1357 | 0.4583 | 0.7672 | |
| October | −1.3138 | 0.4593 | 0.0042 | |
| September | −0.1319 | 0.4590 | 0.7738 | |
| August | 4.7383 | 0.4252 | <.0001 | |
| July | 3.7308 | 0.4142 | <.0001 | |
| June | 0.5034 | 0.3959 | 0.2035 | |
| May | 3.5073 | 0.4330 | <.0001 | |
| April | 0.6403 | 0.4129 | 0.1209 | |
| March | −3.6969 | 0.4045 | <.0001 | |
| February | 0.4483 | 0.4108 | 0.2751 | |
| January | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | . |
Note: Age, median household income, percentage of immigrants, and percentage of subjects with some post-secondary education were coded using restricted cubic spline (RCS) functions with five knots located at the 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 95th percentiles of their distribution, and percentage of aboriginal people was coded using the 5th, 50th and 95th percentiles of its distribution. The variables listed underneath each of the continuous variables are their corresponding spline variables (e.g., age_RCS_lin, age_RCS_S1, age_RCS_S2, and age_RCS_S3 are the 4 spline variables of age).
Figure 3Adjusted associations of vitamin D level (nmol/L). (A) age (reference value = 37 years); (B) median household income (reference value = $CDN 73,264, the median); (C) percentage of individuals who were not born in Canada (reference value = 22%, the median); (D) percentage of Aboriginal people (reference value = 2%, the median); (E) percentage of individuals ≥25 years old who had at least some post-secondary education (reference value = 56%, the median). Age, median household income, percentage of immigrants, and percentage of subjects with some post-secondary education were coded using restricted cubic spline (RCS) functions with five knots located at the 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 95th percentiles of their distribution, and percentage of aboriginal people was coded using the 5th, 50th and 95th percentiles of its distribution. Y-axis represents the difference in mean vitamin D level between individuals with any value of the continuous predictor (as indicated on the x-axis) and individuals with the reference value (as indicated by the vertical dashed line). Shaded area represents the 95% confidence band. Horizontal dashed line indicates the zero difference in mean 25 hydroxyvitamin D level.