SUMMARY: We assessed vitamin D status and its correlates in the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Results showed that serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels <75 nmol/L were common. Given Canada's high latitude, attention should be given to strategies for enhancing vitamin D status in the population. INTRODUCTION: Inadequate vitamin D has been implicated as a risk factor for several clinical disorders. We assessed, in a Canadian cohort, vitamin D status and its correlates, based on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], the best functional indicator of vitamin D status. METHODS: We studied 577 men and 1,335 women 35+ years from seven cities across Canada in the randomly selected, population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Participants completed a comprehensive questionnaire. Serum 25(OH)D was measured by immunoassay. Multivariate linear regression modeling assessed the association between 25(OH)D and determinants of vitamin D status. RESULTS: Participants (2.3%) were deficient in 25(OH)D (<27.5 nmol/L); a further 18.1% exhibited 25(OH)D insufficiency (27.5-50 nmol/L). Levels <75 nmol/L were evident in 57.5% of men and 60.7% of women and rose to 73.5% in spring (men) and 77.5% in winter (women); 25(OH)D <50 nmol/L was ≤10% year round for those supplementing with ≥400 IU vitamin D/day but was 43.9% among those not supplementing in winter and spring. The strongest predictors of reduced 25(OH)D for both men and women were winter and spring season, BMI ≥30, non-white ethnicity, and lower vitamin D supplementation and its modification by fall and winter. CONCLUSIONS: In this national Canadian cohort, vitamin D levels <75 nmol/L were common, particularly among non-white and obese individuals, and in winter and spring. Vitamin D intake through diet and supplementation and maintenance of normal weight are key modifiable factors for enhancing vitamin D status and thus potentially influencing susceptibility to common chronic diseases.
SUMMARY: We assessed vitamin D status and its correlates in the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Results showed that serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels <75 nmol/L were common. Given Canada's high latitude, attention should be given to strategies for enhancing vitamin D status in the population. INTRODUCTION: Inadequate vitamin D has been implicated as a risk factor for several clinical disorders. We assessed, in a Canadian cohort, vitamin D status and its correlates, based on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], the best functional indicator of vitamin D status. METHODS: We studied 577 men and 1,335 women 35+ years from seven cities across Canada in the randomly selected, population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Participants completed a comprehensive questionnaire. Serum 25(OH)D was measured by immunoassay. Multivariate linear regression modeling assessed the association between 25(OH)D and determinants of vitamin D status. RESULTS:Participants (2.3%) were deficient in 25(OH)D (<27.5 nmol/L); a further 18.1% exhibited 25(OH)D insufficiency (27.5-50 nmol/L). Levels <75 nmol/L were evident in 57.5% of men and 60.7% of women and rose to 73.5% in spring (men) and 77.5% in winter (women); 25(OH)D <50 nmol/L was ≤10% year round for those supplementing with ≥400 IU vitamin D/day but was 43.9% among those not supplementing in winter and spring. The strongest predictors of reduced 25(OH)D for both men and women were winter and spring season, BMI ≥30, non-white ethnicity, and lower vitamin D supplementation and its modification by fall and winter. CONCLUSIONS: In this national Canadian cohort, vitamin D levels <75 nmol/L were common, particularly among non-white and obese individuals, and in winter and spring. Vitamin D intake through diet and supplementation and maintenance of normal weight are key modifiable factors for enhancing vitamin D status and thus potentially influencing susceptibility to common chronic diseases.
Authors: Edward D Gorham; Cedric F Garland; Frank C Garland; William B Grant; Sharif B Mohr; Martin Lipkin; Harold L Newmark; Edward Giovannucci; Melissa Wei; Michael F Holick Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Anne C Looker; David A Lacher; Christine M Pfeiffer; Rosemary L Schleicher; Mary Frances Picciano; Elizabeth A Yetley Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari; Douglas P Kiel; Bess Dawson-Hughes; John E Orav; Ruifeng Li; Donna Spiegelman; Thomas Dietrich; Walter C Willett Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Claudie Berger; Linda S Greene-Finestone; Lisa Langsetmo; Nancy Kreiger; Lawrence Joseph; Christopher S Kovacs; J Brent Richards; Nick Hidiroglou; Kurtis Sarafin; K Shawn Davison; Jonathan D Adachi; Jacques Brown; David A Hanley; Jerilynn C Prior; David Goltzman Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Mandy E Turner; Christine A White; Sarah M Taylor; Kathryn Neville; Karen Rees-Milton; Wilma M Hopman; Michael A Adams; Tassos Anastassiades; Rachel M Holden Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Caroline S Duchaine; Denis Talbot; Mohamed Nafti; Yves Giguère; Sylvie Dodin; André Tourigny; Pierre-Hugues Carmichael; Danielle Laurin Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2020-02-03
Authors: N Yoshimura; S Muraki; H Oka; M Morita; H Yamada; S Tanaka; H Kawaguchi; K Nakamura; T Akune Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 4.507