Literature DB >> 23566069

The development of practice guidelines for independent living donor advocates.

Jennifer L Steel1, Andrea Dunlavy, Maranda Friday, Kendal Kingsley, Deborah Brower, Mark Unruh, Henkie Tan, Ron Shapiro, Mel Peltz, Melissa Hardoby, Christina McCloskey, Mark Sturdevant, Abhinav Humar.   

Abstract

The practice recommendations discussed here are based on the findings of the national survey as well as the opinions of the authors. The recommendations that are proposed here are not exhaustive and are aspirational in intent and are likely to evolve with time. Practice guidelines are recommended for legal and regulatory issues (e.g., state or federal laws), consumer or public benefit (e.g., improving service delivery, avoiding harm to the patient, decreasing disparities in underserved or vulnerable populations), and for professional guidance (e.g., new role, professional risk management issues, advances in practice). Without such practice guidelines, donors, and indirectly the candidates, may be at increased risk for possible bias or undue harm.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23566069      PMCID: PMC3623012          DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  7 in total

1.  Criteria for practice guideline development and evaluation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2002-12

2.  Reducing the financial disincentives to living kidney donation: will compensation help the way it is supposed to?

Authors:  Anthony P Monaco
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Nephrol       Date:  2007-01-23

3.  Medicare program; hospital conditions of participation: requirements for approval and re-approval of transplant centers to perform organ transplants. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2007-03-30

Review 4.  A Report of the Amsterdam Forum On the Care of the Live Kidney Donor: Data and Medical Guidelines.

Authors:  Francis Delmonico
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2005-03-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Consensus statement on the live organ donor.

Authors:  M Abecassis; M Adams; P Adams; R M Arnold; C R Atkins; M L Barr; W M Bennett; M Bia; D M Briscoe; J Burdick; R J Corry; J Davis; F L Delmonico; R S Gaston; W Harmon; C L Jacobs; J Kahn; A Leichtman; C Miller; D Moss; J M Newmann; L S Rosen; L Siminoff; A Spital; V A Starnes; C Thomas; L S Tyler; L Williams; F H Wright; S Youngner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A national survey of independent living donor advocates: the need for practice guidelines.

Authors:  J Steel; A Dunlavy; M Friday; K Kingsley; D Brower; M Unruh; H Tan; R Shapiro; M Peltz; M Hardoby; C McCloskey; M Sturdevant; A Humar
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  The living donor advocate: a team approach to educate, evaluate, and manage donors across the continuum.

Authors:  Dianne LaPointe Rudow
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.065

  7 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  The Psychosocial and Independent Living Donor Advocate Evaluation and Post-surgery Care of Living Donors.

Authors:  Dianne LaPointe Rudow; Kathleen Swartz; Chelsea Phillips; Jennifer Hollenberger; Taylor Smith; Jennifer L Steel
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2015-09

2.  Early experiences of independent advocates for potential HIV+ recipients of HIV+ donor organ transplants.

Authors:  Juli M Bollinger; Ann Eno; Shanti Seaman; Diane Brown; Sarah E Van Pilsum Rasmussen; Aaron A R Tobian; Dorry L Segev; Christine M Durand; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Managing the Psychosocial and Financial Consequences of Living Donation.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Larissa Myaskovsky; Jennifer L Steel; Andrea F DiMartini
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2014-03-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.