Literature DB >> 26293351

The Psychosocial and Independent Living Donor Advocate Evaluation and Post-surgery Care of Living Donors.

Dianne LaPointe Rudow1, Kathleen Swartz2, Chelsea Phillips3, Jennifer Hollenberger4, Taylor Smith5, Jennifer L Steel6.   

Abstract

Solid organ transplantation as a treatment for end stage organ failure has been an accepted treatment option for decades. Despite advances in medicine and technology, and increased awareness of organ donation and transplantation, the gap between supply and demand continues to widen. Living donation has been an option that has increased the number of transplants despite the continued shortage of deceased organs. In the early 2000s live donor transplantation reached an all-time high in the United States. As a result, a consensus meeting was convened in 2000 to increase the oversight of living donor transplantation. Both the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the United Network for Organ Sharing developed regulations that transplant programs performing live donor transplantation. These regulations and guidelines involve the education, evaluation, informed consent process and living donor follow-up care. Two areas in which had significant changes included the psychosocial and the independent living donor advocate (ILDA) evaluation. The purpose of this paper was to outline the current regulations and guidelines associated with the psychosocial and ILDA evaluation as well as provide further recommendations for the administration of a high quality evaluation of living donors. The goals and timing of the evaluation and education of donors; qualifications of the health care providers performing the evaluation; components of the evaluation; education provided to donors; documentation of the evaluation; participation in the selection committee meeting; post-decline and post-donation care of donors is described. Caveats including the paired donor exchange programs and non-directed and directed donation are also considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; Evaluation; Independent living donor advocate; Living donor; Psychosocial evaluation; Transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26293351      PMCID: PMC4575900          DOI: 10.1007/s10880-015-9426-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings        ISSN: 1068-9583


  22 in total

1.  Quality of life after lobectomy for adult liver transplantation.

Authors:  Leona Kim-Schluger; Sander S Florman; Thomas Schiano; Marian O'Rourke; Rosemarie Gagliardi; Martin Drooker; Sukru Emre; Thomas M Fishbein; Patricia A Sheiner; Myron E Schwartz; Charles M Miller
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Kidney transplantation between seven pairs of identical twins.

Authors:  J E MURRAY; J P MERRILL; J H HARRISON
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1958-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Medicare program; hospital conditions of participation: requirements for approval and re-approval of transplant centers to perform organ transplants. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2007-03-30

Review 4.  Living-donor liver transplantation in children.

Authors:  Sukru Emre
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2002-02

5.  Perioperative mortality and long-term survival following live kidney donation.

Authors:  Dorry L Segev; Abimereki D Muzaale; Brian S Caffo; Shruti H Mehta; Andrew L Singer; Sarah E Taranto; Maureen A McBride; Robert A Montgomery
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Outcomes of 385 adult-to-adult living donor liver transplant recipients: a report from the A2ALL Consortium.

Authors:  Kim M Olthoff; Robert M Merion; Rafik M Ghobrial; Michael M Abecassis; Jeffrey H Fair; Robert A Fisher; Chris E Freise; Igal Kam; Timothy L Pruett; James E Everhart; Tempie E Hulbert-Shearon; Brenda W Gillespie; Jean C Emond
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Psychosocial health of living kidney donors: a systematic review.

Authors:  K K Clemens; H Thiessen-Philbrook; C R Parikh; R C Yang; M L Karley; N Boudville; G V Ramesh Prasad; A X Garg
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Long-term consequences of kidney donation.

Authors:  Hassan N Ibrahim; Robert Foley; LiPing Tan; Tyson Rogers; Robert F Bailey; Hongfei Guo; Cynthia R Gross; Arthur J Matas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Recipient morbidity after living and deceased donor liver transplantation: findings from the A2ALL Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  C E Freise; B W Gillespie; A J Koffron; A S F Lok; T L Pruett; J C Emond; J H Fair; R A Fisher; K M Olthoff; J F Trotter; R M Ghobrial; J E Everhart
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Kidney and liver living donors: a comparison of experiences.

Authors:  Dianne LaPointe Rudow; Marian Chariton; Carla Sanchez; Sara Chang; David Serur; Robert S Brown
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.065

View more
  2 in total

1.  Validation of the american quality assessment model and performance improvement to the brazilian transplant.

Authors:  Letícia de Fatima Lazarini; Linda Ohler; Janine Schirmer; Bartira de Aguiar Roza
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2020-02-14

2.  Low Rates of Preemptive Kidney Transplantation: A Root Cause Analysis to Identify Opportunities for Improvement.

Authors:  Mona Alsharani; Faisal Basonbul; Seychelle Yohanna
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2021-01-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.