| Literature DB >> 23565740 |
Christine Berndt-Zipfel, Georg Michelson, Markus Dworak, Michael Mitry, Andrea Löffler, Andreas Pfützner, Thomas Forst.
Abstract
Numerous rheological and microvascular alterations characterize the vascular pathology in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study investigated effects of vildagliptin in comparison to glimepiride on retinal microvascular blood flow and erythrocyte deformability in T2DM.Fourty-four patients with T2DM on metformin monotherapy were included in this randomized, exploratory study over 24 weeks. Patients were randomized to receive either vildagliptin (50 mg twice daily) or glimepiride individually titrated up to 4 mg in addition to ongoing metformin treatment. Retinal microvascular blood flow (RBF)and the arteriolar wall to lumen ratio (WLR) were assessed using a laser doppler scanner. In addition, the rythrocyte elongation index (EI) was measured at different shear stresses using laserdiffractoscopy.Both treatments improved glycaemic control (p < 0.05 vs. baseline; respectively). While only slight changes in RBF and the WLR could be observed during treatment with glimepiride, vildagliptin significantly increased retinal bloodflow and decreased the arterial WLR (p < 0.05 vs. baseline respectively). The EI increased during both treatments over a wide range of applied shear stresses (p < 0.05 vs. baseline). An inverse correlation could be observed between improved glycaemic control (HbA1c) and EI (r = -0.524; p < 0.0001) but not with the changes in retinal microvascular measurements.Our results suggest that vildagliptin might exert beneficial effects on retinal microvascular blood flow beyond glucose control. In contrast, the improvement in erythrocyte deformability observed in both treatment groups,seems to be a correlate of improved glycaemic control.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23565740 PMCID: PMC3637086 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-59
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Baseline demographics and baseline characteristics of the study groups
| n | 22 | 22 |
| Male / female | 13 / 9 | 15 / 7 |
| Age (years) | 60 ± 7 | 57 ± 9 |
| Duration of diabetes (years) | 6.1 ± 4.4 | 8.4 ± 9.0 $ |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.3 ± 0.6 | 7.4 ± 0.7 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 33.3 ± 6.7 | 34.6 ± 5.9 |
mean ± SD; $ = p < 0.05 in between both groups.
Investigational parameters at baseline, after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment in the observational groups
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HbA1c (%) | 7.28 ± 0.59 | 7.41 ± 0.74 | 6.70 ± 0.50 * | 6.95 ± 0.82 * | 6.57 ± 0.45 * | 6.74 ± 0.75 * |
| Fasting BG (mmol/L) | 8.2 ± 1.9 | 8.4 ± 1.5 | 7.0 ± 1.2 * | 7.6 ± 1.9 | 7.0 ± 1.2 * | 7.4 ± 1.4 * |
| Adiponectin (μg/mL) | 5.6 ± 3.1 | 5.0 ± 3.5 | 5.4 ± 2.8 | 5.5 ± 4.1 | 5.7 ± 2.7 | 5.7 ± 4.1 * |
| Body weight (kg) | 93.7 ± 19.6 | 99.3 ± 14.9 | 94.4 ± 18.9 | 98.7 ± 15.0 | 95.5 ± 19.0 | 97.6 ± 14.3 * |
| RBF (AU) | 74.2 ± 5.3 | 75.1 ± 5.8 | 74.7 ± 6.9 | 75.3 ± 5.8 | 76.1 ± 7.6 | 77.9 ± 5.9 * |
| WLR (AU) | 0.47 ± 0.08 | 0.46 ± 0.06 | 0.45 ± 0.09 | 0.43 ± 0.07 | 0.43 ± 0.08 | 0.40 ± 0.06 * |
| EI AUC0.3–60 (AU*min) | 2536 ± 228 | 2568 ± 196 | 2505 ± 256 | 2570 ± 170 | 2682 ± 240 * | 2623 ± 210 * |
BG =blood glucose; RBF =Retinal blood flow; WLR = arteriolar wall to lumen ratio; EI AUC0.3–60 = area under curve for the elongation index in the shear stress range of 0.3-60 Pa; mean ± SD; * = p < 0.05 vs. baseline.
Figure 1Mean change from baseline in retinal blood flow (RBF) during glimepiride and vildagliptin treatment after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment (□ = glimepiride; ■ = vildagliptin; mean ± SEM; * = p < 0.05 vs. baseline).
Figure 2Mean change from baseline in retinal arteriolar wall to lumen ratio (WLR) during glimepiride and vildagliptin treatment after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment (□ = glimepiride; ■ = vildagliptin; mean ± SEM; * = p < 0.05 vs. baseline).
Erythrocyte deformability – elongation index (EI) at different shear stress rates at baseline and after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment in both treatment groups
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 0.65 ± 0.68 | 0.86 ± 0.45 | 0.93 ± 0.80 | 0.87 ± 0.63 | 1.65 ± 1.40 * | 1.54 ± 0.91 * |
| 0.6 | 2.66 ± 1.14 | 2.55 ± 1.24 | 2.37 ± 1.37 | 2.65 ± 1.34 | 3.76 ± 2.13 | 3.67 ± 1.73 * |
| 1.2 | 8.53 ± 2.25 | 8.80 ± 2.00 | 7.96 ± 2.38 | 8.79 ± 2.29 | 10.11 ± 2.66 * | 10.24 ± 2.90 * |
| 3 | 20.89 ± 3.60 | 21.71 ± 3.24 | 20.09 ± 3.68 | 21.53 ± 3.28 | 24.13 ± 3.74 * | 23.95 ± 3.14 * |
| 6 | 30.50 ± 3.95 | 31.33 ± 3.45 | 29.81 ± 4.17 | 31.15 ± 3.25 | 33.80 ± 4.13 * | 33.20 ± 3.32 * |
| 12 | 38.62 ± 4.01 | 39.36 ± 3.34 | 37.95 ± 4.33 | 39.28 ± 3.02 | 41.37 ± 4.12 * | 40.59 ± 3.33 * |
| 30 | 46.43 ± 3.86 | 47.07 ± 3.38 | 45.94 ± 4.47 | 47.14 ± 2.82 | 48.80 ± 4.13 * | 47.71 ± 3.59 |
| 60 | 50.12 ± 3.86 | 50.75 ± 3.48 | 49.70 ± 4.36 | 50.89 ± 2.97 | 52.69 ± 4.25 * | 51.32 ± 4.05 |
mean ± SD; * = p < 0.05 vs. baseline.