Literature DB >> 23565511

New perspectives in electronic fetal surveillance.

Emily F Hamilton1, Philip A Warrick.   

Abstract

Despite its recognized limitations, fetal heart rate monitoring is a mainstay of intrapartum care. Although the basic technology in standard electronic fetal monitors has changed little in recent decades, clinical behavior in response to heart rate monitoring has changed considerably. In addition to clearly defined nomenclature and clinical guidelines, there is an increased awareness that environmental and human factors can impair clinical judgment, resulting in delayed intervention and, consequently, birth-related injury. This review examines three essential steps that affect clinical outcome: (1) signal acquisition, (2) associations with physiological outcome, and (3) clinical intervention. Only the third step is directly responsible for changing clinical outcome. However, timely initiation of interventions is dependent upon the second step, which is dependent upon the fi rst step. Thus, deficiencies at each step tend to accumulate and contribute to the worsening of overall clinical outcome. This review article summarizes advances occurring at each step. The synergy and convergence of innovations in engineering, mathematics, and behavioral science shows considerable promise in intrapartum fetal surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23565511     DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Med        ISSN: 0300-5577            Impact factor:   1.901


  8 in total

1.  The future of fetal monitoring.

Authors:  Adam J
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012

Review 2.  Cardiotocography and beyond: a review of one-dimensional Doppler ultrasound application in fetal monitoring.

Authors:  Faezeh Marzbanrad; Lisa Stroux; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Tracing Among Small-for-Gestational Age Compared With Appropriate-for-Gestational-Age Neonates.

Authors:  Suneet P Chauhan; Steven J Weiner; George R Saade; Michael A Belfort; Uma M Reddy; John M Thorp; Alan T N Tita; Russell S Miller; Mara J Dinsmoor; David S McKenna; Bradley Stetzer; Dwight J Rouse; Ronald S Gibbs; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Yoram Sorokin; Steve N Caritis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Automated detection of perinatal hypoxia using time-frequency-based heart rate variability features.

Authors:  Shiying Dong; Boualem Boashash; Ghasem Azemi; Barbara E Lingwood; Paul B Colditz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Predictive Abilities of Fetal Electrocardiogram-Derived Parameters during Labor in Newborn Acidemia: Our Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Ning Tian; Weiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Changing Perspectives of Electronic Fetal Monitoring.

Authors:  Mark I Evans; David W Britt; Shara M Evans; Lawrence D Devoe
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 7.  Intelligent systems in obstetrics and midwifery: Applications of machine learning.

Authors:  Stavroula Barbounaki; Victoria G Vivilaki
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2021-12-20

8.  Intrapartum Resuscitation Interventions for Category II Fetal Heart Rate Tracings and Improvement to Category I.

Authors:  Uma M Reddy; Steven J Weiner; George R Saade; Michael W Varner; Sean C Blackwell; John M Thorp; Alan T N Tita; Russell S Miller; Alan M Peaceman; David S McKenna; Edward K S Chien; Dwight J Rouse; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Yoram Sorokin; Steve N Caritis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 7.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.